Nifedipine Compared to Atosiban for Treating Preterm Labor
Information source: HaEmek Medical Center, Israel
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 19, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Labor, Premature
Intervention: Atosiban (Drug); Nifedipine (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: HaEmek Medical Center, Israel Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Gali Garmi, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: HaEmek Medical Center, Afula, Israel
Overall contact: Gali Garmi, MD, Phone: 972-4-6494031, Email: galit_ga@clalit.org.il
Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and the safety of nifedipine
compared to atosiban for treating preterm labor.
Clinical Details
Official title: Nifedipine Compared to Atosiban for Treating Preterm Labor. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Crossover Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: delaying labor
Secondary outcome: drugs side effectsobstetrical (number of days to delivery, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery) neonatal (Apgar score, sepsis, IVH, NEC, RDS, DEATH)
Eligibility
Minimum age: N/A.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Female.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Gestational age between 24 to 34 weeks which had been documented by a definite LMP
and sonography up to 20 weeks.
2. All women fulfilled the criteria of preterm labor. The diagnosis of preterm labor
required the presence of 4 uterine contractions or more over 30 minutes, each lasting
at least 30 seconds, and documented cervical change. The cervical criteria were met
when either of the following was present:
1. Nulliparous women: a single cervical examination demonstrating dilatation of 0
cm to 4 cm and effacement of at least 50%
2. Multiparous women: a single cervical examination demonstrating dilatation of 1
cm to 4 cm and effacement of at least 50%.
3. Provision of written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Chorioamnionitis
2. Preterm rupture of membranes
3. Vaginal bleeding
4. Major fetal malformations
5. Severe hypertensive disorders
6. Intrauterine growth restriction (< 5th percentile).
7. Non-reassuring fetal heart rate
8. Maternal contraindications
1. Chronic hypertension
2. Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg
3. Cardiovascular disease
4. Elevated hepatic enzymes
9. Congenital or acquired uterine malformation
Locations and Contacts
Gali Garmi, MD, Phone: 972-4-6494031, Email: galit_ga@clalit.org.il
HaEmek Medical Center, Afula 18100, Israel; Recruiting Gali Garmi, MD, Phone: 972-4-6494031, Email: galit_ga@clalit.orgil Raed Salim, MD, Phone: 972-4-6494035, Email: salim_ra@clalit.orgil
Additional Information
Related publications: King JF, Flenady V, Papatsonis D, Dekker G, Carbonne B. Calcium channel blockers for inhibiting preterm labour; a systematic review of the evidence and a protocol for administration of nifedipine. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003 Jun;43(3):192-8. Review. Papatsonis DN, Van Geijn HP, Adèr HJ, Lange FM, Bleker OP, Dekker GA. Nifedipine and ritodrine in the management of preterm labor: a randomized multicenter trial. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):230-4. Moutquin JM, Sherman D, Cohen H, Mohide PT, Hochner-Celnikier D, Fejgin M, Liston RM, Dansereau J, Mazor M, Shalev E, Boucher M, Glezerman M, Zimmer EZ, Rabinovici J. Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of atosiban and ritodrine in the treatment of preterm labor: a multicenter effectiveness and safety study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1191-9.
Starting date: January 2008
Last updated: July 19, 2008
|