Oral Versus IV Proton Pump Inhibitor in High-risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers After Endoscopic Hemostasis
Information source: National Taiwan University Hospital
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on February 07, 2013 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Peptic Ulcers
Intervention: Pantoprazole (Pantoloc) (Drug); Lansoprazole (Takepron OD) (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: National Taiwan University Hospital Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Chieh-Chang Chen, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: National Taiwan University Hospital Yunlin Branch
Overall contact: Chieh-Chang Chen, MD, Phone: 88655323911, Ext: 2200, Email: chiehchang.chen@gmail.com
Summary
Endoscopic hemostasis has been documented by a number of clinical studies to be effective in
decreasing rebleeding, need for emergency surgery, and hospitalization days. Studies showed
adjuvant treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after initial endoscopic hemostasis
reduced recurrent ulcer bleeding. However, the optimal dose and route of adjuvant PPI
therapy remains controversial. A recent study demonstrated frequent oral PPI offered similar
acid control as currently recommended intravenous infusion PPI did in patients with bleeding
ulcers. The investigators hypothesize that an frequent oral PPI treatment has similar
benefit as proton pump inhibitor infusion in patient with bleeding ulcers after combined
endoscopic hemostasis.
Clinical Details
Official title: Oral Versus Intravenous Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment in High-risk Bleeding Peptic Ulcers After Endoscopic Hemostasis: a Prospective Randomized Comparative Study
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Clinical rebleeding
Secondary outcome: Blood transfusionNeed of surgery Lengths of hospital stay Mortality rate
Detailed description:
Acute peptic ulcer bleeding remains a therapeutic challenge with significant morbidity and
mortality. Endoscopic therapy using various modalities significantly reduces re-bleeding,
need for surgery and mortality in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Endoscopic therapy
achieves successful hemostasis in more than 90% of patients, and re-bleeding occurs in
10-30% of patients. Re-bleeding has an important impact on prognosis. Studies showed
adjuvant treatment with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) after initial endoscopic hemostasis
reduced recurrent ulcer bleeding. Two consensus documents have endorsed a high-dose PPI
regimen (80 mg stat followed by an infusion of 8 mg/h for 72 h). The biologically plausible
mechanism of benefit of such a high-dose regimen is to promote clot stability by sustaining
the intragastric pH above 6. However, the optimal dose and administration route of proton
pump inhibitors (PPI) for the prevention of peptic ulcer rebleeding remains unclear.
The use of IV PPIs adds significantly to the cost of patient care in hospital. Recent
studies reported oral PPI may have similar acid suppressive effect as high dose PPI
infusion. A prospective trial and a retrospective analysis have shown that oral PPI therapy
may also be effective in decreasing rebleeding rates in patients with acute gastrointestinal
bleeding due to high-risk peptic ulcer disease, and the magnitude of benefit appears similar
to what has been demonstrated with IV PPIs. A meta-analysis reported no difference in the
magnitude of risk reduction between the oral- and the intravenous-route. Given the
significant cost savings over their IV counterparts, oral PPIs would be an attractive choice
of therapy in this situation provided that they have a similar efficacy to IV PPIs. However,
no studies have directly compared oral and IV PPI therapy in this setting.
We conducted a head-to-head study, comparing two strategies for PPI administration in the
prevention of rebleeding, surgery, and death in patients with high-risk bleeding peptic
ulcers in whom successful endoscopic hemostasis was achieved.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥ 18
- Confirmed ulcer bleeding with Forrest Ia, Ib, IIa
- Endoscopic hemostasis achieved by combined endoscopic hemostasis
- Informed consent obtained
Exclusion Criteria:
- No consent
- Unsuccessful endoscopic treatment
- Upper GI malignancy
- History of subtotal gastrectomy
- Bleeding tendency, platelet count < 80x109/L, prothrombin time INR >1. 5
- Myocardial infarction or cerebrovascular accident within one week
- Ulcer bleeding because of mechanical factors (such as, induction of NG tube)
- Malignancy or other advanced disease with a life expectancy of < 6 months
- IV PPI > 40mg within 24hrs before enrollment
- Decompensated liver cirrhosis
- Requiring dialysis
- Pregnant or lactating women
- History of allergy or severe side effects to lansoparzole or pantoprazole
Locations and Contacts
Chieh-Chang Chen, MD, Phone: 88655323911, Ext: 2200, Email: chiehchang.chen@gmail.com
National Taiwan Univeristy Hospital Yunlin Branch, Dou-liou, Taiwan; Recruiting Chieh-Chang Chen, MD, Phone: 88655323911, Email: chiehchang.chen@gmail.com Chieh-Chang Chen, MD, Principal Investigator
National Taiwan Univeristy Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Not yet recruiting Jyh-Ming Liou, MD Jyh-Ming Liou, MD, Principal Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: August 2010
Last updated: June 20, 2012
|