Minocycline and Perfusion Pressure Augmentation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Information source: University of Calgary
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 19, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Spinal Cord Injuries
Intervention: Minocycline (Drug); placebo (Drug); SCPP augmentation (Procedure); SCPP control (Procedure)
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: University of Calgary Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Steven Casha, MD PhD FRCSC, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of Calgary R. John Hurlbert, MD PhD FRCSC, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of Calgary David Zygun, MD MSc, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of Calgary
Overall contact: Steven Casha, MD PhD, Phone: 403 944 3405, Email: scasha@ucalgary.ca
Summary
While research in animal models of spinal cord injury have provided many promising insights,
human studies have failed to produce effective therapies. We propose to investigate the drug
Minocycline (a metalloproteinase inhibitor) for the treatment of spinal cord injured
patients aiming to limit neurological injury and improve neurological outcome. This drug
influences several secondary injury mechanisms implicated in spinal cord injury and has been
effective in improving outcome after spinal cord injury in animal models. We also propose to
examine the safety and feasibility of spinal cord perfusion pressure augmentation with a
protocol of IV fluids and inotrope medications versus standard maintenance of mean arterial
pressure in subjects who exhibit a decrease in perfusion pressure to less than 75 mmHg. The
purpose of this pilot study is 1) to evaluate the feasibility of a clinical trial protocol
for Minocycline in patients with acute spinal cord injury, and 2) to ensure adequate drug
dosing and metabolic effect. After undergoing a process of informed consent, patients
agreeing to participate in the study will be randomized to placebo or treatment groups in a
double-blind fashion. Clinical neurological examinations, patient-reported quality of life,
and functional independence categorization will be combined with serum and cerebrospinal
fluid laboratory investigations to establish some of the pharmacological properties and the
safety profile of this medication in this group of patients. In addition, patient tolerance
to the dosing regimen will be assessed. The results of this study will provide the
preliminary data necessary to plan for a larger prospective, randomized, controlled,
double-blind clinical trial to assess efficacy and to further assess safety.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Pilot Study to Assess Clinical Safety and Tolerance of Minocycline and Spinal Perfusion Pressure Augmentation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Protocol compliance, feasibility and adverse events
Secondary outcome: American Spinal Injury Association - motor score (primary clinical outcome) and sensory scoresShort Form 36 - Quality of Life Assessment Functional Independence Measure London Handicap Scale Spinal Cord Injury Measure CSF collection (6/day) and biochemical assays Sequential Anatomical MRI
Eligibility
Minimum age: 16 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 16 or over
- Motor complete or motor incomplete acute spinal cord injury involving bony spinal
levels between C0 and T11
- Patient able to provide informed consent
- Randomization and commencement of administration of first drug dose within 12 hours
of injury
- surgical decompression if needed to be performed within 24 hours of the injury
- subjects exhibiting spinal cord perfusion pressure (lumbar drain transduced pressure - mean arterial pressure)> 75 mmHg will be randomized to active augmentation protocol
versus maintenance of mean arterial pressure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute spinal cord injury >12 hours old
- Isolated sensory deficit, motor intact
- Isolated cauda equina injury or injury at bony level T12 or below
- History of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)
- Pre-existing hepatic or renal disease
- Tetracycline hypersensitivity
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
- Isolated sensory deficit
- Isolated radicular motor deficit
- Significant leukopenia (white blood cell count < ½ times the lower limit of normal)
at screening
- Elevated liver function tests (AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase, or total bilirubin > 2
times the upper limit of normal) at screening
- Presence of systemic disease that might interfere with patient safety, compliance or
evaluation of the condition under study (e. g. insulin-dependent diabetes, Lyme
disease, clinically significant cardiac disease, HIV, HTLV-1)
- Associated traumatic conditions interfering with informed consent or outcome
assessment (e. g. closed head injury, liver contusion)
- Known uncorrected severe coronary artery disease or evidence of active coronary
ischemia (ECG changes, positive Troponin) will be excluded from SCPP randomization
Locations and Contacts
Steven Casha, MD PhD, Phone: 403 944 3405, Email: scasha@ucalgary.ca
Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta T2N 2T9, Canada; Recruiting Steven Casha, MD PhD FRCSC, Phone: 403 944 3405, Email: scasha@ucalgary.ca Steven Casha, MD PhD FRCSC, Principal Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: June 2004
Ending date: November 2010
Last updated: June 4, 2008
|