Topical Diclofenac Efficacy in Symptomatic Relief of Temporomandibular Degenerative Joint Disease
Information source: University of Alberta, Graduate Orthodontic Program
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Temporomandibular Degenerative Joint Disease.
Intervention: 1.5% diclofenac in 45.5% DMSO (topical treatment) (Drug); 45.5% DMSO (topical placebo) (Drug)
Phase: N/A
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: University of Alberta, Graduate Orthodontic Program Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Norman Thie, BSc DDS MSc, Study Director, Affiliation: University of Alberta
Summary
The use of a topical medication was compared to placebo to be applied over the symptomatic
temporomandibular joint in women with the diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the
temporomandibular joint(s).
The hypothesis is to investigate whether the use of a topical anti-inflammatory medication
when compared to the placebo would decrease the pain of the affected joint and/or increased
mouth opening.
Clinical Details
Official title: Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Study on Topical Diclofenac Efficacy in Symptomatic Relief of Temporomandibular Degenerative Joint Disease in Women.
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: 1.To compare the efficacy of topical placebo and topical diclofenac in functional pain intensity at commencement of the study, Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90 through the use of VAS.
Secondary outcome: 1.To compare the efficacy of topical placebo and topical diclofenac in voluntary and assisted vertical jaw opening through the use of a 100 mm ruler from commencement of the study, Day 30, Day 60 and Day 90.2.To compare the efficacy of topical placebo and topical diclofenac on the effect on quality of life by comparing measures at the commencement of the study to the end of treatment, through use of a subsection of The Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI). 3.To compare the efficacy of topical placebo and topical diclofenac on pain intensity by comparing measures obtained at the commencement of the study, to those obtained at the end using a subsection of The Brief Pain Inventory Scale. 4.To compare the efficacy of topical placebo and topical diclofenac on the disability on specific activities of daily living by comparing baseline measures, to that obtained at the end of treatment, utilizing The Pain Disability Index. 5.To compare the adverse effects documented by the topical diclofenac group to those documented by the topical placebo group. 6.To compare the amount of breakthrough medication used by the topical diclofenac group versus the topical placebo group in order to assess if the use of topical diclofenac reduces the amount of oral medication.
Detailed description:
The purpose of this study is to measure the efficacy of topical diclofenac to topical placebo
in the symptomatic relief of degenerative temporomandibular joint disease in a female
population between the ages of 18-45 years of age.
Primary Objectives:
- To compare the efficacy of placebo and diclofenac topical PLO gel in terms of functional
pain intensity of symptomatic temporomandibular degenerative joint disease in
participants by comparing baseline measures obtained prior to commencement of the study,
with the measurements obtained at 30, 60 and 90 days during the treatment intervention
through the use of a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Secondary Objectives:
- To compare the efficacy of placebo and diclofenac topical in PLO gel in terms of
measurement of the range of motion of voluntary and assisted vertical jaw opening of
symptomatic temporomandibular degenerative joint disease (TMDJD) in participants by
comparing baseline measures obtained prior to commencement of the study, Time 0, through
the use of a 100 mm ruler to measures obtained at 30, 60 and 90 days during the
treatment intervention.
- To compare the efficacy of placebo and diclofenac in terms of effect on quality of life
of symptomatic TMDJD in participants by comparing baseline measures obtained prior to
commencement of the study, Time 0, to measures obtained after 90 consecutive days of
treatment, utilizing a subsection of The Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI) which relates
to quality of life.
- To compare the efficacy of placebo and diclofenac in terms of effect on pain intensity
of symptomatic TMDJD in participants by comparing baseline measures obtained prior to
commencement of the study, Time 0, to measures obtained after 90 consecutive days of
treatment, utilizing a subsection of The Brief Pain Inventory Scale (BPI) (Cleeland &
Ryan, 1994) which relates to pain intensity.
- To compare the efficacy of placebo and diclofenac topical PLO gel in terms of effect on
disability on specific activities of daily living of TMDJD participants by comparing
baseline measures obtained prior to the commencement of the study, Time 0, to that
obtained after 90 consecutive day of treatment, utilizing The Pain Disability Index
(PDI) (Bush & Harkin, 1995).
Tertiary Objectives
- To compare the adverse effects documented by the topical diclofenac group to those
documented by the topical placebo group.
- To compare the amount of breakthrough medication used by the topical diclofenac group
versus the placebo group in order to assess if the use of topical diclofenac reduces the
amount of oral medication.
- To compare reasons for withdrawal from the study between topical placebo and topical
diclofenac groups.
The null hypothesis is that there is no difference between the efficacy of topical diclofenac
and topical placebo in the treatment of degenerative temporomandibular joint disease.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 45 Years.
Gender(s): Female.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- A baseline score of ≥ 3. 0 cm on a 10 cm measured VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) according
to the criteria established by Collins et al. (Collins, Moore, & Mcquay, 1997) (for
moderate and severe pain) required for participants prior to use of analgesics, in
order to provide adequate sensitivity.
- Females from the ages of 18 to 45 years of age inclusive.
- Primary degenerative joint disease as diagnosed through radiographs utilizing
volumetric cone beam computed tomographic images reformatted in axial, coronal, and
sagittal views that will be assessed by an independent radiologist.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Nursing or expectant females or females planning on becoming pregnant.
- Participants not clearly diagnosed as having symptomatic degenerative joint disease.
- Participants having DJD secondarily to trauma, previous infection or general
joint/muscle disease.
- Participants who have experienced adverse reactions to any of the components of the
formulation used in the study.
- Participants who have evidence of periodontal disease, dental caries, oral pathology
or infections of the oral cavity.
- Participants with a history of neuropathic pain in the orofacial region.
- Participants scheduled for surgery in the near future.
- Participants currently undergoing orthodontic treatment.
- Participants with a history of epilepsy, cardiovascular disease, renal
disease/disorder, hepatic disease/disorder, glaucoma, bowel obstruction, urinary
retention, diabetes, hypertension or orthostatic hypotension.
- Participants with a malignancy.
- Participants who are currently using topical preparations for palliative relief for
their DJD.
- Participants with a baseline intensity of ≤ 3/10 on the VAS.
- Inability to understand English.
- Participants who have been wearing an occlusal splint ≤ 3 months.
Locations and Contacts
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2N8, Canada
Additional Information
Related publications: Mason L, Moore RA, Edwards JE, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Aug 19;5:28. Review. Mason L, Moore RA, Edwards JE, Derry S, McQuay HJ. Topical NSAIDs for acute pain: a meta-analysis. BMC Fam Pract. 2004 May 17;5:10. Moore RA, Tramer MR, Carroll D, Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Quantitative systematic review of topically applied non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. BMJ. 1998 Jan 31;316(7128):333-8. Erratum in: BMJ 1998 Apr 4;316(7137):1059. Roth SH, Shainhouse JZ. Efficacy and safety of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) in the treatment of primary osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 2004 Oct 11;164(18):2017-23. Tugwell PS, Wells GA, Shainhouse JZ. Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):2002-12. Towheed TE. Pennsaid therapy for osteoarthritis of the knee: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. J Rheumatol. 2006 Mar;33(3):567-73. Review.
Starting date: May 2006
Ending date: April 2007
Last updated: May 7, 2007
|