Facet Versus Trigger Point Injections for Chronic Neck Pain
Information source: Lawson Health Research Institute
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Chronic Mechanical (Myofascial) Neck Pain
Intervention: Betamethasone (Procedure); Dexamethasone (Procedure); Intramuscular Lidocaine (Procedure); Home Exercise (Behavioral)
Phase: Phase 2
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Lawson Health Research Institute Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): David M Walton, BScPT, PhD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Western University, Canada
Overall contact: David M Walton, BScPT, PhD, Phone: +1-519-661-2111, Ext: 80145, Email: dwalton5@uwo.ca
Summary
A) Background Chronic neck pain is a significant and common issue which is difficult to
treat. Tight bands of muscle (trigger points) can be a source of chronic neck pain and they
are sometimes injected to manage chronic neck pain. However, these injections seldom lead to
significant, long-lasting relief. In some cases, these trigger points may originate from
injury or damage to a specific joint in the neck (the facet joint). Treatment of this joint
with cortisone injection may lead to improved pain relief and function.
B) Hypothesis By injecting the facet joint with cortisone, the pain associated with tight
bands of muscle in the neck and shoulders will be relieved to a greater extent than that
attained through trigger point injection.
C) Methods Patients with neck pain will have a test to determine if any pain originates from
the facet joint. Among those who have significant pain from these joints, a comparison
between the effect of cortisone injection into these joints versus injection into the
trigger points will be evaluated.
D) Expected Results and Significance
It is expected that injection with cortisone into the facet joints will lead to improved
pain and function when compared to that attained from trigger point injection. In addition,
the number of trigger points, and the pain and headache that originate from these trigger
points, are expected to decrease with cortisone injection into the facets to a statistically
and clinically significant extent. Results from this pilot study will then influence the
design of future trials into chronic neck pain treatment, leading to better clinical
recommendations. A peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations will facilitate
dissemination.
Clinical Details
Official title: Facet Versus Trigger Point Injection for Management of Chronic Muscular Neck Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial and Creation of a Clinical Prediction Algorithm
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Secondary outcome: Pain Intensity Numeric Rating ScaleNeck Disability Index Headache Impact Test - 6 Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 Adverse Events Checklist Global Cervical Active Range of Motion Mechanical (Pressure) Pain Threshold
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 65 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- between 18 and 65 years of age and able to speak and understand conversational
English
- Primary diagnosis of chronic (>6 months) mechanical / myofascial neck pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- Those with significant cognitive decline or cognitive interference (as identified by
the physician) will be excluded, as will those who have received radiofrequency
ablation of any cervical nerve within the past year, intra-articular cortisone facet
injection within the past 4 months, trigger point injection into the
cervical/shoulder girdle muscles within the past 4 months, or the presence of any
known contraindication to injection (Attachments).
- Women who are or may be pregnant (based on last menstruation) will be excluded.
- Finally, for the purposes of this pilot study, those currently involved in active
litigation regarding the neck pain will be excluded. Those with active worker's
compensation claims or currently receiving salary indemnity benefits through motor
vehicle insurance providers will be included, as they represent a significant
proportion of this population.
Locations and Contacts
David M Walton, BScPT, PhD, Phone: +1-519-661-2111, Ext: 80145, Email: dwalton5@uwo.ca
St. Joseph's Hospital / Parkwood Hospital, London, Ontario N6A 4V2, Canada; Recruiting Eldon Loh, MD, Email: Eldon.Loh@sjhc.london.on.ca Eldon Loh, MD, Sub-Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: May 2013
Last updated: March 30, 2015
|