A Comparative Bronchial Provocation Study With Mannitol and Methacolinie in a Korean Population
Information source: BL&H Co., Ltd
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Asthma
Intervention: methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests (Procedure)
Phase: N/A
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: BL&H Co., Ltd Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Sang-Heon Cho, M.D.,Ph.D., Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Seoul National University College of Medicine
Summary
Asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls were recruited prospectively from four
referral hospitals in Korea. Participants were challenged with each of methacholine and
mannitol inhalation on different days. Their diagnostic utility was evaluated by calculating
their sensitivity and specificity for asthma diagnosis. Response-dose-ratio was also
compared.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Comparative Bronchial Provocation Study With Mannitol and Methacolinie in a Korean Population
Study design: Allocation: Non-Randomized, Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
Primary outcome: sensitivity comparison of the mannitol challenge test and methacholine challenge test
Secondary outcome: specificity comparison of the mannitol challenge test and methacholine challenge testpositive predictive value comparison of the mannitol challenge test and methacholine challenge test negative predictive value comparison of the mannitol challenge test and methacholine challenge test
Detailed description:
This study was a prospective, multicenter study performed at four referral hospitals in
Korea: Seoul National University Hospital, Samsung Medical Center, Ajou University Hospital,
and Hanyang University Medical Center. Hospital-based recruitment was performed for
asthmatic patients and non-asthmatic controls. Asthmatic patients were defined as those who
had been diagnosed with asthma by specialist physicians; they had recurrent symptoms of
asthma (wheezing and dyspnea) and used anti-asthmatic medication for 6 months before the
enrollment. Non-asthmatic controls were voluntarily recruited from hospital visitors; they
were included if they had never wheeze or physician diagnosed asthma.
Common inclusion criteria were Korean adults between the age of 18 and 70 years who could
understand and perform lung function tests and bronchial challenges. Exclusion criteria were
any one of following: history of recent respiratory infection (within the last 4 weeks),
history of a recent surgery, history of heart disease that could impose risks during
bronchial challenges, history of uncontrolled hypertension, current smokers or ex-smokers
with more than 10 pack-years, history of known pulmonary diseases with the exception of
asthma, pregnancy or lactation, severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] of >35 kg/m2), history
of any health condition considered inappropriate for participation in this study, or a
pre-bronchodilator predictive value of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of <70%.
All participants underwent methacholine bronchial challenge test and mannitol challenge test
on different days, separated by least 24 h, as in previous reports. 7, 10 All asthmatic
patients stopped their anti-asthma medications before the tests according to the
predetermined protocols. The protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of
Seoul National University Hospital. All subjects gave written informed consent.
Methacholine challenge test> The methacholine challenge test was performed as previously
described. 11, 12 Pulmonary function testing was carried out using a spirometry system
(SensorMedics 2130; SensorMedics, CA, USA). The methacholine challenge test was performed
using the Chai method13 with minor modifications. Briefly, methacholine was prepared at the
following concentrations, diluted with saline: 0. 25, 0. 625, 1, 4, 16, and 25 mg/mL.
Methacholine was delivered as an aerosol by a Rosenthal-French dosimeter (Laboratory for
Applied Immunology, Inc., Baltimore, MD) and a nebulizer. Subjects were instructed to inhale
five inspiratory capacity breaths while increasing the methacholine concentration from 0. 25
to 25 mg/mL. The methacholine concentration that caused a 20% decrease in the FEV1 from
baseline was defined as PC20. AHR was defined as positive at PC20 < 16 mg/mL.
Mannitol challenge test> A commercial mannitol (Aridolâ„¢; BL&H Co., Ltd., South Korea) kit
was used, and the challenge test was performed according to the manufacturer's protocols. 14
The mannitol capsule dose started at 0 mg and increased to a total cumulative dose of 635
mg. Each capsule was placed in the inhalation device, and a hole was made by pressing the
device button before inhalation. After a deep breath of mannitol, the FEV1 was measured
after 60 seconds. The test was considered positive if the FEV1 value decreased by more than
15% compared with the baseline FEV1. The cumulative mannitol dose that caused a 15% decrease
in the FEV1 from baseline was defined as PD15. If the FEV1 did not decline by more than 15%,
the dose was increased until a cumulative dose of 635 mg was reached. If the FEV1 did not
fall by more than 15% until the last dose, the test was considered negative.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 70 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Common inclusion criteria were Korean adults between the age of 18 and 70 years who
could understand and perform lung function tests and bronchial challenges.
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of recent respiratory infection (within the last 4 weeks)
- History of a recent surgery
- History of heart disease that could impose risks during bronchial challenges
- History of uncontrolled hypertension
- Current smokers or ex-smokers with more than 10 pack-years
- History of known pulmonary diseases with the exception of asthma
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Severe obesity (body mass index [BMI] of >35 kg/m2)
- History of any health condition considered inappropriate for participation in this
study
- Pre-bronchodilator predictive value of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) of
<70%
Locations and Contacts
Additional Information
Starting date: July 2011
Last updated: April 2, 2014
|