A Study to Compare Meloxicam IM Once Daily Versus Meloxicam Orally Once Daily in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Information source: Boehringer Ingelheim
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Arthritis, Rheumatoid
Intervention: Meloxicam ampoule (Drug); Meloxicam tablet (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Boehringer Ingelheim Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Boehringer Ingelheim Study Coordinator, Study Chair, Affiliation: Boehringer Ingelheim Shanghai
Summary
The objective of this trial was to assess the efficacy and safety of 15 mg meloxicam i. m.
once daily compared with 15 mg meloxicam tablets once daily p. o. in patients with Rheumatoid
arthritis over a time period of 7 days.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Randomized, Open-labelled Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Meloxicam 15 mg IM Ampoules Once Daily and Meloxicam 15 mg Tablets Administered Orally Once Daily Over a Period of 7 Days in Patients With RA.
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Patient's assessment of overall painPatient's global assessment of disease activity
Secondary outcome: Tender/swollen joint count; Global assessment of disease activity; Assessment of physical function and patient status; Duration of morning stiffness.
Detailed description:
This was a randomized (1: 1), open-label, multi-center, active-control, parallel-group study
to compare the efficacy of 15 mg meloxicam i. m. once daily compared with 15 mg meloxicam
tablets once daily p. o. in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over a time period of 7 days.
The primary endpoint:
- Patient's assessment of overall pain
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity
The secondary endpoint:
- Tender/swollen joint count
- Investigator's global assessment of disease activity
- Patient's assessment of physical function
- Duration of morning stiffness
- Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition assessed by the
patient/investigator
- Onset of action
- Time to maximum pain relief
- Paracetamol consumption
- Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy
- Final global assessment of efficacy by the patient/inveatigator
Safety endpoints
- Local tolerability assessment of the injections by the patient/investigator
- Patient's /Investigator's assessment of overall tolerability
- Number, nature and severity of adverse events
- Laboratory investigations
- Withdrawals due to safety reasons
Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave
their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i. e. meloxicam
ampoule or meloxicam tablet).
The study period totaled 8-14 days included screening, randomisation, study drug
administration, and 7-day follow-up. The relevant assessment were performed on the day of
randomisation and 7-day follow up.
The primary endpoint: Pain on active movement,
The secondary endpoint:
- Pain at rest
- Patient status with regard to change of arthritic condition assessed by the
patient/investigator
- Patient's assessment of arthritic condition
- Onset of action
- Time to maximum pain relief
- Paracetamol consumption
- Withdrawals due to inadequate efficacy
- Final global assessment of efficacy by the patient/investigator
Safety endpoints
- Local tolerability assessment of the injections by the patient/investigator
- Patient's /Investigator's assessment of overall tolerability
- Number, nature and severity of adverse events
- Laboratory investigations
- Withdrawals due to safety reasons
Patients eligible for the trial who met all inclusion and exclusion criteria and who gave
their informed consent were randomized to one of two treatment groups (i. e. meloxicam
ampoule or meloxicam tablet).
The study period totaled 8-14 days included screening, randomisation, study drug
administration, and 7-day follow-up. The relevant assessment were performed on the day of
randomisation and 7-day follow up.
Study Hypothesis:
The null hypothesis of interest is that the primary endpoint for meloxicam ampoule is
inferior to oral meloxicam. The alternative is that meloxicam ampoule is noninferior to the
oral meloxicam .
Comparison(s):
- Patient's assessment of overall pain by VAS prior and after the treatment
- Patient's global assessment of disease activity by VAS prior and after the treatment
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female aged 18 years or above
- The patient has rheumatoid arthritis, as defined by the American Rheumatism
Association.
- Assessment of overall pain (by the patient), after a washout for NSAID of at least 2
days (3 days for oxicams), must exceed 40 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)
- Symptoms of RA requiring administration of NSAIDs
- Outpatients
- Willingness and ability to provide written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known or suspected hypersensitivity to the trial drugs or their excipients,
analgesics, antipyretics or NSAIDs
- Any clinical evidence of active peptic ulceration during the previous 6 months
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding (precaution: attention should be drawn to reports that
NSAIDs were reported to decrease the effectivity of intrauterine devices)
- Asthma, nasal polyps, angioneurotic oedema or urticaria following the administration
of aspirin or NSAIDs
- Concomitant treatment with anti-coagulants (including heparin), lithium
- Concomitant administration of other NSAIDs or analgesic agents (except paracetamol up
to 4g/day)
- Administration of any NSAID during the last 2 days (3 days for any oxicam) prior to
the first administration of the trial drug
- Concomitant treatment with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, D-penicillamine, chloroquine
or any other disease modifying antirheumatic drug initiated or with an altered dose
over the previous 3 months
- Concomitant treatment with an oral corticosteroid initiated or with an altered dose
over the previous month
- Parenteral or intraarticular administration of corticosteroids in the previous month
- Any i. m. injection during the previous 7 days
- Synovectomy and/or surgical treatment for RA in the previous month or during the
trial
- Any physiotherapy which will be changed during the trial
- Any contra-indication to i. m. injections
- Clinical evidence of or known severe cardiac, hepatic, renal, metabolic,
haematological disease, mental disturbance, ulcerative colitis
- Any other rheumatological or non-rheumatological disease that could interfere with
the evaluation of efficacy and safety
- Serum creatinine 125 % of the upper limit of normal range ; aspartate
amino-transferase (AST/SGOT) and/or alaline amino-transferase (ALT/SGPT) 200 % of
the upper limit of normal range
- Platelet count < 100,000/mm3 ; leucocytes count < 3,000/mm3
- Participation in another clinical trial during this study or during the previous
month
- Previous participation in this trial (i. e. having been allocated a randomized
treatment number)
- Patient unable to comply with the protocol
Locations and Contacts
Beijing Xuan Wu Hospital, Beijing 100050, China
People's Hospital, Beijing University, Beijing 100044, China
1st Affiliated, Anhui Medical University, Hefei City, Anhui Province 230022, China
Qilu Hospital, Shang Dong University, Nan City 250012, China
Shanghai Changhai Hospital, Shanghai 200443, China
Shanghai Guanghai Hospital, Shanghai 200052, China
Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai 200001, China
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital, Shanghai 200032, China
Additional Information
Starting date: July 2004
Last updated: May 11, 2012
|