NAET® Testing Devices in Detection of Hypersensitivity to Cane Sugar
Information source: Nambudripad's Allergy Research Foundation
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Allergy; Fatigue; Hypoglycemia; Hyperglycemia; Indigestion
Intervention: NAET Testing Modalities (Procedure)
Phase: Phase 1/Phase 2
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Nambudripad's Allergy Research Foundation Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Devi S Nambudripad, DC,L.Ac,PhD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: NAR Foundation
Summary
Background: Studies have noted a correlation between food sensitivities and health disorders.
Various commonly seen health problems may be caused by cane sugar since it is lavishly and
frequently used by people worldwide.
Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of NAET testing instruments in detecting
hypersensitivities to cane sugar.
Materials and Methods: Seventy-four subjects volunteered for this study. They were asked to
write down one of their major health problems, the amount of sugar consumed on a daily basis
and any known health problem(s) related to sugar consumption. The following testing
modalities were used in the study: (1). Allergy Symptom-Rating Scale (ASRS); (2). NST Rating
Scale (NSTRS); (3). Pulse Difference Rating Scale (PDRS). Test-1 was done twice. Tests 2 and
3 were done three times each: once without contacting sugar and then contacting sugar at
one minute and ten minutes.
Results: Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9. 1.3. Assumptions were met for the
distribution. A paired t-test was performed on the data. The results on ASRS: u=1. 65,
SE=0. 14, t-statistic 11. 79, df 74, p-value<0. 0001. Three pairwise evaluations done on three
separate data collected on PDRS. 1.- (T-B): u=2. 46, SE=0. 77, t-stat 3. 17, df 74, p-value <
0. 0001; 2.- (H-T): u=3. 48, SE=0. 62, t-stat 5. 59, df 74, p-value < 0. 0001; and 3. - (H-B):
u=5. 9, SE=0. 95, t-stat 6. 23, df 74, p-value < 0. 0001; and Three pairwise evaluations done on
three data collected on NSTRS. 1. - u=0. 92, SE=0. 07, t-statistic 14. 1, df 74, p-value <0. 0001; 2. - u=1. 13, SE=0. 09, t-statistic 13. 2, df 74, p-value <0. 0001; 3. -
u=2. 05, SE=0. 12, t-statistic 17. 34, df 74, p-value <0. 0001 .
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of NAET testing instruments (ASRS, NST and PDRS) as
beneficial and reliable screening modalities to detect hypersensitivity and allergy to cane
sugar before it manifests as sugar consumption-related health problems in sensitive people.
Clinical Details
Official title: NAET® Testing Devices in Detection of Hypersensitivity to Cane Sugar
Study design: Diagnostic, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: The study will evaluate the efficacy of NAET® testing devices in detecting sensitivity to cane sugar (intolerance, hypersensitivity, or allergy) in a group of subjects from both sexes who had no prior knowledge of any health problems related to sugar
Secondary outcome: Improve opportunity to get better dietary management and guidance for a better life-style. This may reduce or prevent the risk of sugar-related problems at a later age.
Detailed description:
NAET® testing devices are able to detect various levels of sensitivities to food substances
in people (JNECM Vol. 1, No. 1 & 2, 2005) before they manifest in symptoms. Using NAET testing
devices various levels of sensitivities to sugar can be easily detected and the people who
are found to be sensitive to sugar can be advised to take strict preventive measures thus
helping to alleviate their health problems.
Primary Objective of the Study The study will evaluate the efficacy of NAET® testing
devices in detecting sensitivity to cane sugar (intolerance, hypersensitivity, or allergy)
in a group of subjects from both sexes who had no prior knowledge of any health problems
related to sugar consumption.
Sample Characteristics Eighty subjects from a group of medical professionals of both sexes
who came to attend a medical conference volunteered to participate in the study. These
volunteers came from different parts of Japan thus representing a large part of the country.
Nine NAET® practitioners volunteered to supervise the entire study.
An on-site invitation to participate in the study was given to a group of 80 medical
professionals who had come to attend a medical conference in Tokyo, Japan. The invitation
to take part in the study was given to each member in the same morning at the time of
registration for the conference. The 80 subjects who responded to the invitation were asked
to complete an Allergy Symptom Rating Scale. They were asked to list an approximate amount
of daily sugar consumption in number of teaspoons. They were also asked to record if they had
suffered from any known sugar-related problems in the past. The five volunteer-subjects with
known diabetes and hypoglycemia were excluded from the study.
All 75 subjects had completed the Allergy Symptom Rating Scale form (ASRS) initially prior to
entering the study. After enrolling in the study, the examiners performed the Neuromuscular
sensitivity testing (NST Rating Scale) on their subjects before touching the test sample and
recording of the results. Initial radial pulse was taken and recorded.
(Detailed information on the Allergy Symptom-Rating scale (ASRS); NSTRS, and PDRS: Subject
were asked to mark and rate their symptoms in their own words on a zero to ten scale where
zero=normal; and ten=maximum discomfort): 0= no allergy; (1-3)=1=mild; (4-6)= 2=moderate;
(7-10)=3=severe. After the initial testing (after completing ASRS form, NSTRS after balancing
the body, and after initial pulse reading) each one of the subjects was given a test tube
with clear liquid (dissolved sugar) in their hands. The examiners tested the NST of the
subjects with them holding the sample-test tube in their hands and the results recorded. The
radial pulse was also checked and recorded. Then they were asked to continue to hold the
samples for full ten minutes. At the end of ten minutes, they were assigned to be tested for
NST and Pulse by different examiners. While still holding the test tube in the hand, the
radial pulse was tested and recorded; NST was perfomed and recorded and each one of them was
asked to complete another Allergy Symptom Rating Scale.
After completing the initial test, the monitors moved the subjects one at a time to a
different area and each one of them was asked to continue to hold the sample-tubes in their
hands for the following ten minutes.
At the end of ten minutes’ waiting period with the test tubes in their hands, each subject
was given another ASRS form to record their symptoms one more time. They were also
instructed to rate their symptoms on a zero to ten scale. Then the monitors ushered them to
different examiners to check the NST and radial pulse one more time, while still holding the
test tubes in their hands. The results were recorded in a separate paper and the monitors
collected the results and sent for analysis.
Results: Statistical analysis was performed using SAS 9. 1.3. Assumptions were met for the
distribution. A paired t-test was performed on the data. The results on ASRS: u=1. 65,
SE=0. 14, t-statistic 11. 79, df 74, p-value<0. 0001. Three pairwise evaluations done on three
separate data collected on PDRS. 1.- (T-B): u=2. 46, SE=0. 77, t-stat 3. 17, df 74, p-value <
0. 0001; 2.- (H-T): u=3. 48, SE=0. 62, t-stat 5. 59, df 74, p-value < 0. 0001; and 3. - (H-B):
u=5. 9, SE=0. 95, t-stat 6. 23, df 74, p-value < 0. 0001; and Three pairwise evaluations done on
three data collected on NSTRS. 1. - u=0. 92, SE=0. 07, t-statistic 14. 1, df 74, p-value <0. 0001; 2. - u=1. 13, SE=0. 09, t-statistic 13. 2, df 74, p-value <0. 0001; 3. -
u=2. 05, SE=0. 12, t-statistic 17. 34, df 74, p-value <0. 0001 .
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the use of NAET testing instruments (ASRS, NST and PDRS) as
beneficial and reliable screening modalities to detect hypersensitivity and allergy to cane
sugar before it manifests as sugar consumption-related health problems in sensitive people.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 22 Years.
Maximum age: 70 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Allergy to foods Undiagnosed health problems -
Exclusion Criteria:
Cancer History of previous Anaphylaxis Any debilitating health problems
-
Locations and Contacts
6714-32 Beach Blvd.,, Buena park, California 90621, United States
Additional Information
NAR Foundation is a nonprofit Research Organization
Starting date: January 2005
Ending date: January 2006
Last updated: April 2, 2006
|