DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more



Neoadjuvant Epirubicin, Cyclophosphamide, and Paclitaxel With or Without Gemcitabine in Treating Women Who Are Undergoing Surgery for Early Breast Cancer

Information source: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 20, 2015
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Condition(s) targeted: Breast Cancer

Intervention: cyclophosphamide (Drug); epirubicin hydrochloride (Drug); gemcitabine hydrochloride (Drug); paclitaxel (Drug); comparative genomic hybridization (Genetic); microarray analysis (Genetic); mutation analysis (Genetic); conventional surgery (Procedure); neoadjuvant therapy (Procedure)

Phase: Phase 3

Status: Active, not recruiting

Sponsored by: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s):
Helena Earl, MBBS, PhD, FRCP, Affiliation: Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Summary

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and gemcitabine use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Giving combination chemotherapy before surgery may shrink the tumor so that it can be removed during surgery. It is not yet known which combination chemotherapy regimen is more effective in treating early breast cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying different regimens of combination chemotherapy to compare how well they work in treating women who are undergoing surgery for early invasive breast cancer.

Clinical Details

Official title: A Phase III Randomized Neoadjuvant Study of Sequential Epirubicin/Cyclophosphamide and Paclitaxel + - Gemcitabine in Poor Risk Early Breast Cancer

Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Primary Purpose: Treatment

Primary outcome: Complete pathological response after 4 courses

Secondary outcome:

Survival

Disease-free survival

Effect of prognostic factors

Detailed description: OBJECTIVES: Primary

- Compare the complete pathological response rate in women with poor-risk early breast

cancer treated with neoadjuvant sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and paclitaxel with vs without gemcitabine. Secondary

- Compare the disease-free and overall survival of patients treated with these regimens.

- Compare the toxicity of these regimens in these patients.

- Compare the effect of these regimens on prognostic factors in these patients.

- Correlate molecular profiles, specific gene mutations, and genomic and gene expression

changes with clinical outcome in these patients.

- Compare the quality of life of patients treated with these regimens.

- Determine the health economics associated with this study.

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to estrogen-receptor status (negative vs greater than 10% positive cells), HER-2 status (positive vs negative), tumor size (30-50 mm vs greater than 50 mm), and clinical involvement of axillary nodes (yes vs no). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.

- Neoadjuvant sequential chemotherapy:

- Arm I: Patients receive epirubicin IV and cyclophosphamide IV on day 1. Treatment

repeats every 21 days for 4 courses. Patients then receive paclitaxel IV over 3 hours on day 1. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses.

- Arm II: Patients receive paclitaxel as in arm I followed by epirubicin and

cyclophosphamide as in arm I.

- Arm III: Patients receive epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as in arm I followed by

paclitaxel as in arm I and gemcitabine IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8. Treatment repeats every 21 days for 4 courses.

- Arm IV: Patients receive paclitaxel as in arm I and gemcitabine as in arm III

followed by epirubicin and cyclophosphamide as in arm I.

- Surgery: After completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, patients in all arms undergo

definitive surgery. Tumor tissue is removed from a subset of patients during serial biopsies. Molecular and genetic profiling, mutation analysis, and comparative genomic analysis is performed on the tissue samples. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, after 4 courses of chemotherapy, after the completion of chemotherapy, after surgery, and then every 6 months for 2 years. Patients are followed every 2 months for 2 years and then every 3 months for 3 years. Peer Reviewed and Funded or Endorsed by Cancer Research UK PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 800 patients (200 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study.

Eligibility

Minimum age: N/A. Maximum age: N/A. Gender(s): Female.

Criteria:

DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:

- Histologically confirmed invasive breast cancer

- Grade 2 or 3

- Tumor size at least 3 cm by ultrasound

- No evidence of metastatic disease

- Hormone receptor status:

- Not specified

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: Age

- Not specified

Sex

- Female

Menopausal status

- Not specified

Performance status

- Not specified

Life expectancy

- Not specified

Hematopoietic

- Not specified

Hepatic

- Not specified

Renal

- Not specified

Other

- Not pregnant or nursing

- Negative pregnancy test

- Fertile patients must use effective contraception

- Fit to receive study chemotherapy

PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: Biologic therapy

- Not specified

Chemotherapy

- Not specified

Endocrine therapy

- Not specified

Radiotherapy

- Not specified

Surgery

- Not specified

Locations and Contacts

Addenbrooke's Hospital at Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, England CB2 2QQ, United Kingdom
Additional Information

Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database

Starting date: January 2005
Last updated: August 6, 2013

Page last updated: August 20, 2015

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2017