IM Olanzapine Versus IM Haloperidol Plus Lorazepam for Acute Agitation in Schizophrenia
Information source: National Taiwan University Hospital
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 19, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Schizophrenia; Schizoaffective Disorder; Agitation
Intervention: IM olanzapine (Drug); haloperidol plus lorazepam IM (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: National Taiwan University Hospital Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Tzung-Jeng Hwang, MD, Study Director, Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital
Overall contact: Tzung-Jeng Hwang, MD, Phone: 886-2-23123456, Ext: 66792, Email: tjhwang@ntu.edu.tw
Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intramuscular 10 mg
olanzapine versus intramuscular 5 mg haloperidol plus lorazepam 2 mg in the treatment of
acute agitated schizophrenic patients of Taiwanese populations.
Clinical Details
Official title: An Open-Label, Randomized Trial of Intramuscular Olanzapine Versus Intramuscular Combination of Haloperidol and Lorazepam in the Treatment of Acute Agitation in Schizophrenia
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Subject), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Positive and Negative Symptom Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC)
Secondary outcome: Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES)
Detailed description:
To date, there have been no published reports of clinical studies of IM olanzapine versus IM
haloperidol plus lorazepam in patients with schizophrenia. The latter combination is used
quite often as a traditional way to treat agitated schizophrenia patients.
Study Design:
This is a randomized, single-blind, active-controlled, parallel-group study, consisting of
screening and treatment phase. Patients completing the screening phase would be randomized
to receive either 10mg olanzapine IM or 5 mg haloperidol plus 2 mg lorazepam IM . The ratio
of randomization was 1: 1. Treatment assignments are based on a computer-generated
randomization code supplied by central unit with block designs. Patients can receive a
maximum of 3 injections within the first 24-hour period. Second and third injections are
used under the clinical judgment of investigators. The second injection is allowed after
2-hour has elapsed since first injection. The third injection is allowed after 4-hour have
passed since the second injection. Prohibited medications include antiarrythmics,
antipsychotics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antiemetics, and other psychotropic drugs.
Efficacy Assessments:
Patients are assessed by the study investigators at the screening visit and at 15, 30, 60,
120 minutes after first injection. The primary efficacy measure is PANSS-EC, which includes
the items tension, uncooperativeness, hostility, poor impulse control, excitement and is
derived from the PANSS by its originators using a principal-components factor analysis.
Agitation is further assessed by the Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale (ACES) (Copyright
1998, Eli Lilly and Company; all rights reserved). Clinical Global
Impression-Severity(CGI-S)scale37 is used to assess general psychiatric condition. For each
patient, the same rater conducted the assessment throughout the study.
Safety assessments:
During the 24-hour treatment period, safety is assessed by clinical examination and
laboratory investigations, recording spontaneously reported adverse events, completing the
Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS3) and Barnes Akathisia Scales (BAS).
Statistical Procedures:
The efficacy analyses are based on intent-to treat (ITT) population defined as consisting of
all randomized subjects. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) dataset is used to
estimate the missing data. The primary treatment comparisons are 2-hour PANSS-EC scores
after first injection. Continuous efficacy data (eg, change from baseline) are evaluated by
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), adjusting for baseline values and the fixed factors
treatment, center, and treatment-by-center interaction. The treatment-by-center interaction
was tested at the 0. 10 significant levels and dropped from the model if it was not
statistically significant. The 95% confidence interval is used to provide the test of
hypothesis of efficacy of olanzapine is superior to haloperidol plus lorazepam. Categorical
efficacy data are analysed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with center control. For
primary efficacy analyses, the hypothesis was one-sided and evaluated at the 0. 025
significant levels. For other analyses, the test was two-sided and evaluated at the 0. 05
significant levels.
Response is defined a priori as a 40% reduction or more in PANSS-EC scores. Response rate is
also analysed using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with center control, and the
Breslow-Day test to investigate the homogeneity of odds ratio across sites.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 65 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men and non-pregnant, non-lactating women aged 18 to 65 years with a primary
diagnosis of schizophrenia (DSM-IV)
- were hospitalized due to an acute relapse
- were clinically agitated with a minimum total score of ≧ 14 on the five items of the
PANSS-EC and at least one individual item score of ≧ 4 using the 1-7 scoring system
prior to first IM injection of study drug.
Exclusion Criteria:
- female subjects who were either pregnant or breast-feeding;
- patients with acute, serious or unstable medical conditions;
- treatment with benzodiazepines within 4 hours prior to the first IM study drug
administration;
- treatment with an injection depot neuroleptic within 1 injection interval prior to
study drug administration;
- history of allergic reaction or intolerance to study medication(s);
- had a known diagnosis of dementia of any type, as defined in the DSM-IV.
Locations and Contacts
Tzung-Jeng Hwang, MD, Phone: 886-2-23123456, Ext: 66792, Email: tjhwang@ntu.edu.tw
Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan; Recruiting Tzung-Jeng Hwang, MD, Phone: +886-2-23123456, Ext: 66792, Email: tjhwang@ntu.edu.tw
Additional Information
Related publications: Breier A, Meehan K, Birkett M, David S, Ferchland I, Sutton V, Taylor CC, Palmer R, Dossenbach M, Kiesler G, Brook S, Wright P. A double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-response comparison of intramuscular olanzapine and haloperidol in the treatment of acute agitation in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 May;59(5):441-8.
Starting date: July 2006
Ending date: February 2009
Last updated: November 24, 2008
|