Cotrimoxazole Versus Vancomycin for Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections
Information source: Rabin Medical Center
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on November 03, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Staphylococcal Infections; Meningitis; Sepsis; Pneumonia
Intervention: Cotrimoxazole (Drug); Vancomycin (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Rabin Medical Center Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Mical Paul, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Rabin Medical Center Jihad Bishara, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Rabin Medical Center
Overall contact: Mical Paul, MD, Phone: 972-50-4065575, Email: pil1pel@zahav.net.il
Summary
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a major pathogen causing mainly
health-care associated infections and, lately, also community acquired infections. Few
treatment choices exist to treat these infections. The currently recommended antibiotics for
these infections are glycopeptides (vancomycin or teicoplanin). Glycopeptide treatment hs
several disadvantages. It is a last resort antibiotic family that should be reserved for the
future; Vancomycin is less effective that beta-lactam drugs for SA infections susceptible to
both agents; treatment can only be given intravenously; and use of vancomycin has led to the
development of SA strains with partial or complete resistance to vancomycin. Cotrimoxazole is
an old antibiotic active against most strains of MRSA, depending on local epidemiology.
Study hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to show that cotrimoxazole is as effective as
treatment with vancomycin for invasive MRSA infections.
We plan a randomized controlled trial comparing treatment with cotrimoxazole vs. vancomycin
for invasive MRSA infections. The primary efficacy outcome we will assess will be Improvement
or cure with or without antibiotic modifications, defined as: survival at 7 days post
randomization with resolution of fever (<38 for two consecutive days) and resolution of
hypotension (>90 systolic without need for vasopressor support); and physician's assessment
that the primary infection was improved or cured. The primary safety outcome will be
all-cause 30-day survival.
Clinical Details
Official title: Treatment With Cotrimoxazole vs. Vancomycin for Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus: Randomized Controlled Trial
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Primary efficacy: Improved or cure with or without antibiotic modifications, defined as: survival at 7 days post randomization with resolution of fever and resolution of hypotensionPrimary safety: 30-day all cause mortality
Secondary outcome: Improved or cure without antibiotic modificationsModification of the anti-staphylcoccal treatment within 1 week of treatment onset for perceived failure of therapy Survival at 7 days post randomization without the need for modification of the anti-staphylcoccal antibiotic Bacteriological failure, defined as persistent isolation of Staphylococcus aureus with the same phenotype 7 days after or more after treatment onset Need for surgical intervention or other invasive procedures Need for central catheter removal Persistent bacteremia All-cause mortality in ICU and in-hospital Adverse events Durations of fever, assigned antibiotic treatment, mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital stay Resistance development
Detailed description:
Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a major pathogen causing community-acquired and health-care
associated infections. In hospitals, SA infections are associated with a significant burden;
in-hospital mortality during the last 15 years following SA bacteremia in Beilinson hospital
was 38% and did not decrease in recent years. Resistance to beta-lactams is widely prevalent
in hospitals (57% of all SA isolates causing bacteremia at our center). The drug of choice
currently recommended for these infections is a glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin).
Cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole) is a relatively 'old' drug commonly used for
urinary tract infections. In-vitro, it is active against SA, including methicillin-resistance
Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains and its activity against SA is bacteridicidal.
Trimethoprim alone is bactericidal against SA, while sulphamethoxazole alone is relatively
inactive and their combination is synergistic both in-vitro and in-vivo. The prevalence of
cotrimoxazole-susceptible SA varies locally. At our center, 97% of SA strains causing
bacteremia in 2004 were susceptible to cotrimoxazole. Community-acquired MRSA, prevalent in
the United States as a cause for severe skin and soft tissue infections, has not been
described in Israel.
Several reasons exist to search for antibiotics other than vancomycin for MRSA infections.
Vancomycin is less effective that beta-lactam drugs for SA infections susceptible to both
agents. It is the last resort antibiotic for MRSA infections out of the currently recommended
bactericidal antibiotics for invasive infections. Use of vancomycin has led to the
development of SA strains with partial or complete resistance to vancomycin (VISA and VRSA,
respectively). Vancomycin use is associated with the appearance of vancomycin-resistant
enterococcus (VRE) species. Nosocomial infections with VISA and VRE are difficult to treat
and may spread rapidly in the hospital. 10 Finally, vancomycin cannot be administered
orally.
Limited evidence supports the efficacy of cotrimoxazole for MRSA infections, with paucity of
data for high-burden invasive infections. Cotrimoxazole is probably inferior to vancomycin
for methicillin-susceptible SA. ; thus we may infer indirectly its inferiority to methicillin
and drugs alike for MRSA infections. Cotrimoxazole may be less effective than glycopeptides
and oxacillin for left-sided endocarditis. No evidence exists to support the use of
cotrimoxazole empirically for the treatment of suspected SA infections in the hospital.
We plan an open label single-center pragmatic randomized controlled trial to compare
cotrimoxazole to vancomycin. We will include patients with documented or highly suspected
MRSA infections, according to pre-defined risk factors. We chose to target this patient
population to assess the efficacy of cotrimoxazole both empirically and for documented
infections.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults >18 years
- providing signed informed consent or, if unable, having a legal guardian or a
caretaker that will sign informed consent
- Patients with documented MRSA infections:
- MRSA bacteremia
- Other microbiologically documented MRSA infections defined as a clinical source of
infection (CDC criteria) plus microbiological documentation of MRSA from the source of
infection
- Patients with highly probable MRSA infections, prior to microbiological documentation
of the pathogen:
- Suspected neurosurgical meningitis (including VP-shunt meningitis)
- Sepsis during hemodialysis
- Ventilator-associated pneumonia with prior antibiotic treatment within 48 hours
- Catheter-related or suspected catheter-related infections
- Surgical site infection in the presence of a foreign body
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion before randomization:
- Previous antibiotic treatment directed against MRSA >48 hours (including vancomycin,
fucidic acid, rifampicin or cotrimoxazole)
- Known allergy to either study drug
- Pregnancy, lactation
- Previous enrollment in this study
- Concurrent participation in another trial
Exclusions after randomization:
- Documented Staphylococcal infection resistant to cotrimoxazole or VISA or VRSA
- Documented MSSA
- Documented left-sided endocarditis
Locations and Contacts
Mical Paul, MD, Phone: 972-50-4065575, Email: pil1pel@zahav.net.il
Rabin Medical Center; Beilinson Hospital and Davidoff Cancer Center, Petah Tikva 49100, Israel; Recruiting Leonard Leibovici, MD, Phone: 972-3-9376501, Email: leibovic@post.tau.ac.il Ynon Lischinsky, MD, Sub-Investigator Moshe Garty, MD, Sub-Investigator Silvio Pitlik, MD, Sub-Investigator Zmira Samra, Prof., Sub-Investigator Pierre singer, MD, Sub-Investigator Leonard Leibovici, MD, Sub-Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: June 2007
Ending date: January 2011
Last updated: May 21, 2008
|