Effect of Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARB) on Left Ventricular Reverse Remodelling After Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Valvular Aortic Stenosis
Information source: Odense University Hospital
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 08, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Aortic Valve Stenosis; Left Ventricular Hypertrophy; Atrial Fibrillation
Intervention: Candesartan (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Odense University Hospital Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Torben Haghfelt, Md, DMSc, Study Director, Affiliation: Kardiologisk forskningsenhed, OUH Jordi S Dahl, MD, MMSci, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Kardiologisk forskningsenhed, OUH Henrik Nissen, MD, PhD, Study Chair, Affiliation: Kardiologisk forskningsenhed, OUH Jacob E Moller, Md, Ph.D, Study Chair, Affiliation: Kardiologisk forskningsenhed, OUH Lars Videbæk, MD, Ph.d, Study Chair, Affiliation: Kardiologisk forskningsenhed, OUH Lars I Andersen, MD, DMSc, Study Chair, Affiliation: Department of thoracic surgery, OUH
Overall contact: Jordi l S Dahl, MD, MMSCi, Phone: +4528573832, Email: Jordidahl@gmail.com
Summary
The consequence of aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is increased pressure load on the left
ventricle which causes left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and myocardial stretch will cause
activation of cardiac peptides and activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system
(RAAS). The consequence of LV hypertrophy is increased chamber-stiffness and delayed active
LV relaxation which initially will cause diastolic and later systolic dysfunction. In heart
failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease the degree of diastolic dysfunction has been
demonstrated to correlate with functional class, neurohormonal activation and prognosis which
also recently have been suggested for AVS.
With longstanding elevated filling pressures the left atrium (LA) will dilate. Only limited
data are available on the degree and importance of LA dilatation in AVS.
When apparent, symptoms of HF in AVS are associated with high mortality rates. If LV systolic
dysfunction also is present prognosis will deteriorate further. In these cases aorta valve
replacement (AVR) is recommended. AVR will normalize pressure overload and thereby decreases
LV hypertrophy. Previously it was believed that in time LV hypertrophy regressed towards
normal and even normalized. Recent studies however have demonstrated that LV hypertrophy
regression mainly happens during the first year after AVR, and little subsequent changes are
seen during the remaining 10 years. Furthermore, patients that experience most regression of
hypertrophy have more favourable outcome and better functional class than patients with less
regression of hypertrophy. Thus absence of reverse remodelling is associated with poor
outcome after AVR. Importantly the regression of LV hypertrophy is closely paralleled by
decreasing RAAS hyperactivity.
RAAS hyperactivity may be attenuated pharmacologically with angiotensin II receptor blockers
(ARB) which in systemic hypertension with LV hypertrophy has been associated with reverse
remodelling.
The hypothesis is that in patients undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS, 12 months post
operative blockade of the angiotensin II receptor will accelerate LV and LA reverse
remodelling, reduce filling pressures and suppress neurohormonal activation compared with
conventional therapy. This will lead to improved exercise tolerance and due to improved left
atrial function reducing the risk of atrial arrythmias.
Clinical Details
Official title: Left Ventricular Reverse Remodelling After Aortic Valve Replacement in Severe Valvular Aortic Stenosis - Effect of Blockade of the Angiotensin-II Receptor
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Factorial Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: LV mass indexLA volume index Plasma nt-pro BNP concentration
Secondary outcome: Diastolic E/e’ ratioOverall LV function assessed by the Doppler echocardiographic Tei Index Regional LV function assessed with tissue Doppler imaging LV end systolic and end diastolic volume index Atrial arrhythmias assessed with 48h Holter after 12 months Exercise capacity after 12 months Serial changes in LV diastolic, overall LV function and regional LV systolic function Assess serial changes in plasma nt-pro BNP, ANP, and renin
Detailed description:
1. Background:
Aortic valve stenosis (AVS) is the most common valvular disease in the western world.
The prevalence increases with age where “degenerative” changes of the aortic valve with
thickening, accumulation of calcium and progressive dysfunction of the valve usually
becomes apparent in patients older than 60 years. Although the development of AVS
generally is believed to be a degenerative process more recent studies have demonstrated
AVS is caused by a complex process of increased cellularity, lipid accumulation,
extracellular matrix deposition, and with disease progression calcification of lesions.
Although mild and moderate AVS generally is well tolerated severe AVS is associated with
considerable morbidity and mortality, and valve replacement is generally required.
The consequence of AVS is increased pressure load on the left ventricle which causes
changes in the ventricular structure. Pressure overload causes replication of the
sarcomeres leading to left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy, and myocardial stretch will
cause activation of cardiac peptides and activation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone
system (RAAS). With progression of disease, RAAS activation will, through stimulation of
the angiotensin-II receptor mediate fibroblast proliferation, promote fibrosis and
directly affect the extracellular matrix. The consequence of LV hypertrophy and
interstitial fibrosis is increased chamber-stiffness and delayed active LV relaxation
which initially will cause diastolic (increased LV end-diastolic pressure) and later in
the disease progression also systolic dysfunction. In congestive heart failure and
ischemic heart disease the degree of diastolic dysfunction has been demonstrated to
correlate with functional class, neurohormonal activation and prognosis which also
recently has been suggested for AVS. Thus, although not fully elucidated the transition
from well compensated hypertrophy caused by pressure overload to symptomatic heart
failure may be related to evolving diastolic dysfunction. With longstanding elevated
filling pressures the left atrium will dilate due to chronically increased atrial
afterload. Only limited data are available on the degree and importance of LA dilatation
in AVS.
When apparent, symptoms of heart failure in AVS is associated with high mortality rates.
If LV systolic dysfunction also is present prognosis will deteriorate further. In these
cases aorta valve replacement (AVR) is recommended. AVR will normalize pressure overload
and thereby decreases LV hypertrophy. Previously it was believed that in time LV
hypertrophy regressed towards normal and even normalized. More recent studies however
have demonstrated that LV hypertrophy regression mainly happens during the first 12-18
months after AVR, and little subsequent changes are seen during the remaining 10 years.
Furthermore, patients that experience most regression of hypertrophy has more favourable
outcome and better functional class than patients with less regression of hypertrophy.
Thus absence of reverse remodelling is associated with poor outcome after AVR.
Importantly the regression of LV hypertrophy is closely paralleled by decreasing RAAS
hyperactivity.
RAAS hyperactivity may be attenuated pharmacologically using angiotensin converting
enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) which in systemic
hypertension with LV hypertrophy has been associated with reverse remodelling. This may
at least partly be associated with increased collagenase activity and depressed collagen
synthesis. Thus attenuation of RAAS hyperactivity may in theory lead to decreased
myocardial fibrosis and improving the diastolic function of the LV. The effect of ARB
treatment in patients with AVS that have undergone AVR is not known.
2. Hypothesis:
In patients undergoing AVR for symptomatic valvular aortic stenosis, 12 months post
operative blockade of the angiotensin II receptor will accelerate LV and LA reverse
remodelling, reduce filling pressures and suppress neurohormonal activation compared
with conventional therapy. This will lead to improved exercise tolerance and due to
improved left atrial function reducing the risk of atrial arrythmias.
3. Specific Objectives:
3. 1 Primary Objectives
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to compare
1. LV mass index
2. LA volume index
3. Plasma nt-pro BNP concentration after 12 months treatment with candesartan
compared with conventional treatment
3. 2 Secondary Objectives
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to compare
1. Diastolic E/e’ ratio
2. Overall LV function assessed by the Doppler echocardiographic Tei Index
3. Regional LV function assessed with tissue Doppler imaging
4. LV end systolic and end diastolic volume index after 12 months treatment with
candesartan compared with conventional treatment.
3. 3 Tertiary Objectives
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to compare the
occurrence and atrial arrhythmias assessed with 48h Holter after 12 months
treatment with candesartan compared with conventional management.
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to compare exercise
capacity after 12 months treatment with candesartan compared with conventional
management.
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to assess serial
changes in LV diastolic, overall LV function and regional LV systolic function 12
months after valve replacement
- In a consecutive population undergoing AVR for symptomatic AVS to assess serial
changes in plasma nt-pro BNP, ANP, and renin 12 months after valve replacement.
4. Methods:
4. 1 Design
The study is a prospective single center randomized study (PROBE design). Eligible patients
will be randomized to either conventional management or conventional management and 12 months
treatment with candesartan. Treatment with candesartan will be unblinded but all
neurohormonal analyses and analyses of LV and LA size and function will be performed blinded
for treatment allocation and clinical data.
4. 2 Inclusion Criteria
1. Symptomatic severe AVS referred for valve replacement (mechanic prosthesis or
bioprosthesis) at Odense University Hospital
2. Age > 18 years
3. Signed informed consent
4. 3 Exclusion Criteria
1. Severe renal failure (s-creatinine >300 mmole/l)
2. Moderate or severe hepatic failure
3. Moderate or severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF<40%)
4. Patients already treated with ACE-I or ARB
5. Known intolerance for ARB
6. Unwilling to participate in the study
7. Poor echocardiographic window
8. Pregnant women
4. 4 Study Procedures
Patients scheduled for elective aortic valve replacement for severe AVS at Odense University
Hospital will consecutively be offered participation in the study at hospital admission (2
days prior to surgery). If patient consent is obtained patients will undergo the study
program. Baseline echocardiography, neurohormonal analyses, and 6 min walk test will be
performed the day before surgery. After surgery and when the patient is transferred from
cardiac intensive care unit to step down unit treatment with candesartan (Atacand®) 8 mg
daily is initiated, and during hospitalization patients are titrated to 32 mg. After hospital
discharge patients will be followed in the heart failure clinic at Odense University
Hospital. Study medication will be handed to the patient at each visit.
Enrollment is planned to start February 2006 and continue for 18 months or until 140 patients
have been enrolled.
4. 4.1 Echocardiography
Doppler echocardiography will be performed prior to valve replacement, and repeated 3, 6, and
12 months after surgery. Examinations will be performed on a GE medical Vivid 5 ultrasound
machine. Images will be obtained from the parasternal and apical windows. M-mode recordings
will be done in the parasternal long-axis view. Pulsed Doppler measurements of mitral inflow
will be obtained with the transducer in the apical four-chamber view, with a 1-2 mm Doppler
sample volume placed between the tips of mitral leaflets during diastole. Tissue Doppler
imaging of the mitral annulus will be obtained from the apical 4-chamber view with a 1. 5-mm
sample volume placed at the medial mitral annulus. All Doppler echocardiographic examinations
are done with horizontal sweep set to 100 mm/s. At least 3-5 cardiac cycles will be
measured. Finally color coded real time tissue Doppler images will be acquired in the apical
windows.
- End-systolic, end-diastolic volume and ejection fraction will be calculated according to
the Simpson modified biplane method.
- LV mass will be estimated using the recommendations of the American Society of
Echocardiography.
- Maximal left atrial volume will be measured at end-systole with the use of two
orthogonal apical views.
- From the pulsed wave mitral inflow signal, peak E wave velocity, peak A wave velocity,
and mitral E-wave deceleration time will be measured. From pulsed wave Doppler recording
of LV outflow ejection time will be recorded. From these recordings Tei index will be
assessed.
- From peak tricuspid regurgitant velocity and size of inferior v. cava pulmonary arterial
systolic pressure will be estimated.
- From the tissue Doppler assessment of the medial mitral annulus early (E') diastolic
velocity will be recorded. Diastolic function will be graded in grades 0-3 and diastolic
E/e’ ratio calculated.
- From color coded tissue Doppler images systolic longitudinal fibre shortening will be
assessed using tissue tracking, and systolic strain will be assessed on a regional
basis.
4. 4.2 Neurohormonal Analyses
Prior to surgery and at each follow-up visit venous blood samples will be drawn for analysis
of plasma N-terminal proBNP, and of plasma N-terminal ANP concentrations. In addition prior
to surgery and after 6 and 12 months treatment with candesartan RAAS activity will be
assessed using plasma-renin activity, plasma-aldosterone, and plasma-noradrenalin. In
addition plasma will be frozen at each visit for possible later analysis.
4. 4.3 Six Minutes Walk Test
A 6 min. walk test will be performed at baseline and at each outpatient visit (3, 6, 9 and 12
month).
4. 4.3 Holter Monitoring
At the 12 months visit a 2-channel 48 hours Holter monitoring will be performed and analyzed
for occurrence of atrial arrhythmias.
4. 4.4 Blood Pressure
Measurement of blood pressure will be done standardized after 30 min of rest at each visit.
Target blood pressure will be 140/80 mmHg or less and treatment instituted when appropriate.
4. 4.5 Study Events
During the study period hospitalizations for worsening of heart failure, fatal / nonfatal
stroke, fatal/nonfatal acute coronary syndrome, hospitalization for atrial arrhythmias, and
death from all causes will be recorded.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Symptomatic severe AVS referred for valve replacement (mechanic prosthesis or
bioprosthesis) at Odense University Hospital
2. Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Severe renal failure (s-creatinine >300 mmole/l)
2. Moderate or severe hepatic failure
3. Moderate or severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF<40%)
4. Patients already treated with ACE-I or ARB
5. Known intolerance for ARB
6. Unwilling to participate in the study
7. Poor echocardiographic window
8. Pregnant women
Locations and Contacts
Jordi l S Dahl, MD, MMSCi, Phone: +4528573832, Email: Jordidahl@gmail.com
Cardiology Department, Odense University hospital, Odense, Fyn 5000, Denmark; Recruiting Torben Haghfelt, MD DMSc, Phone: +4566113333, Email: bente.wichmann@ouh.fyns-amt.dk Jordi S Dahl, MD, MMsc, Principal Investigator Jacob E Moller, MD, Ph.D, Sub-Investigator Lars Videbæk, MD, Ph.D, Sub-Investigator Torben Haghfelt, MD, DMSc, Sub-Investigator Henrik Nissen, MD, Ph.D, Sub-Investigator Lars I Andersen, MD, DMSc, Sub-Investigator
Additional Information
Related publications: Lindroos M, Kupari M, Heikkila J, Tilvis R. Prevalence of aortic valve abnormalities in the elderly: an echocardiographic study of a random population sample. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Apr;21(5):1220-5. Walther T, Schubert A, Falk V, Binner C, Walther C, Doll N, Fabricius A, Dhein S, Gummert J, Mohr FW. Left ventricular reverse remodeling after surgical therapy for aortic stenosis: correlation to Renin-Angiotensin system gene expression. Circulation. 2002 Sep 24;106(12 Suppl 1):I23-6. Walther T, Schubert A, Falk V, Binner C, Kanev A, Bleiziffer S, Walther C, Doll N, Autschbach R, Mohr FW. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after surgical therapy for aortic stenosis is associated with changes in extracellular matrix gene expression. Circulation. 2001 Sep 18;104(12 Suppl 1):I54-8. Giorgi D, Di Bello V, Talini E, Palagi C, Delle Donne MG, Nardi C, Verunelli F, Mariani MA, Di Cori A, Caravelli P, Mariani M. Myocardial function in severe aortic stenosis before and after aortic valve replacement: a Doppler tissue imaging study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005 Jan;18(1):8-14. Lund O, Emmertsen K, Dorup I, Jensen FT, Flo C. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile. Eur Heart J. 2003 Aug;24(15):1437-46.
Starting date: February 2006
Ending date: October 2008
Last updated: June 27, 2007
|