DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more

  -- advertisement --

Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Device Comparison Study

Information source: Maimonides Medical Center
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on August 08, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Condition(s) targeted: Atrial Fibrillation

Intervention: AtriCure dry bipolar radiofrequency (RF) clamp (Device); Boston Scientific FLEX 10 unipolar microwave antenna (Device); Cryocath SurgiFrost unipolar cryothermic probe (Device); ESTECH Cobra Adhere irrigated unipolar RF antenna (Device); Medtronic Cardioblate BP irrigated bipolar RF clamp (Device); St. Jude Epicor hi-intensity focused ultrasound wand (Device)

Phase: N/A

Status: Recruiting

Sponsored by: Maimonides Medical Center

Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s):
Adam E Saltman, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Director Atrial fibrillation Program, Cardiothoracic Surgeon
Kamran B Ali, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Cardiology Fellow

Overall contact:
Adam E Saltman, MD, Phone: 718-283-7290, Email: asaltman@maimonidesmed.org

Summary

Atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rhythm which requires long term anticoagulation to prevent risk of stroke and long term poor outcomes. At the same time one have heart surgery, a small additional procedure can be done to treat atrial fibrillation. Surgeons have a choice of six different devices that he or she can use to treat your atrial fibrillation. It is not known at this point which device is best at treating you, as each device seems to have the same success rate at curing atrial fibrillation. One of the six devices will be selected randomly by card pulled out at the time of enrollment. It is therefore the purpose of this study to compare the devices to each other and to follow up after surgery to determine if any one device is best. This information will be valuable to surgeons and to patients as the treatment for atrial fibrillation develops in the future.

Clinical Details

Official title: Randomized Comparison of Ablation Devices Used During Surgery for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Historical Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Primary outcome:

Freedom from Atrial fibrillation

Rhythm at 12 months

MACE at 1 and 3 months

Secondary outcome:

Functional and qualitative improvement in heart failure, ejection fraction, left atrial size, exercise tolerance

Rhythm at 3, 6 and 9 months

All other adverse events

Detailed description: Surgery has been used as a treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) for more than 20 years. Although highly successful, it has not been widely adopted because operations designed to cure AF require extensive cutting and suturing of the heart, inflicting a significant risk on the patient. Newer technologies now permit the surgeon to create similar scars on the heart as cutting, but much more quickly and safely than before.

Over the last ten years at least six different devices have been developed, each of which can scar the heart: Microwave, radiofrequency, ultrasound, laser and cold are some of them. Although there are many papers in the literature studying these devices, each seems to cure about 80% of patients with very low risk of morbidity and/or mortality. This leaves the surgeon with almost no basis upon which to base his or her selection of a device: Which is the best? Which should be used? Therefore, a comparison study is like this is desperately needed.

At the time of the surgery, surgeon who perform the AF treatment, he or she will select one of the six devices mentioned above at randomly assigned earlier, at the time of the enrollment. The device will be used to make scars on your heart exactly as described in the manufacturer’s instructions and according to the surgeon’s experience. The operation will then be completed per routine. In other words, the only part of the procedure that will be done differently from any other is that the actual device chosen to perform the ablation will vary from one study subject to another.

Patients will be followed up upto one year with EKGs, Holter monitors, MRI's, 6 minute walk tests, echocardiograms, blood tests like bNP and quality of life questionnaires.

Eligibility

Minimum age: 19 Years. Maximum age: 75 Years. Gender(s): Both.

Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

- All patients undergoing concomitant cardiac surgery who also have AF.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients undergoing re-do or emergency procedures

- Females of child-bearing age who are pregnant

- Age less than 19 and more than 75 years old

Locations and Contacts

Adam E Saltman, MD, Phone: 718-283-7290, Email: asaltman@maimonidesmed.org

Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York 11219, United States; Recruiting
Adam E Saltman, MD, Phone: 718-283-7290, Email: asaltman@maimonidesmed.org
Kamran B Ali, MD, Phone: 718-283-6000, Email: kali@maimonidesmed.org
Additional Information

Starting date: April 2007
Ending date: May 2009
Last updated: April 26, 2007

Page last updated: August 08, 2008

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross

We comply with
HONcode standard.
Verify here.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2008