Efficacy Study of Sublingual Immunotherapy to Treat Ragweed Allergies
Information source: Greer Laboratories
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Allergic Rhinitis
Intervention: Ragweed Allergenic Extract Immunotherapy (Biological); Ragweed allergenic extract (Biological)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Active, not recruiting
Sponsored by: Greer Laboratories
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine an effective dose range for the administration of
ragweed allergenic extract via the sublingual route of administration
Clinical Details
Official title: Parallel, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Adults for the Sublingual-Oral Immunotherapy (SLIT) of Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis With or Without Asthma Caused By Ragweed Pollen
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: The primary efficacy variable will be the average daily rhinoconjunctivitis symptom score (RSS) recorded during the ragweed season.
Secondary outcome: Total allergy relief medication score during the ragweed season will be computed for each Subject. This secondary efficacy variable will be computed for each Subject by summing their individual medication scores for the entire ragweed season.
Detailed description:
Specific allergen immunotherapy as currently practiced in the USA and described in product
labeling comprises the subcutaneous injection of incrementally increasing doses to a targeted
maintenance dose ("build-up") followed by maintenance injections of allergenic
extract/vaccine. Up to 30-40 injections may be required during the build-up phase over a 3-6
month period. When adequate maintenance doses are reached, this form of immunotherapy (SCIT)
has been shown to be highly effective and safe.
Standard practices recommend that the injections be given under the supervision of trained
physicians and that the patient remain in the physician's office at least 20 to 30 minutes
after an injection. The administration of immunotherapy injections are not recommended at
home because of the risk of inadequate recognition and treatment of systemic reactions. The
inconvenience and expense of traveling for allergy injections and the discomfort of the
repeated injections is a disincentive to this form of treatment particularly in pediatric
patients. For example, dropout rates exceeding 50% over a multi-year course of injection
treatment have been reported.
Alternative routes for immunotherapy have been explored, especially in Europe in an attempt
to improve patient compliance and to minimize the risk of serious adverse reactions. For
example, sublingual-oral immunotherapy (SLIT), which is the administration of the allergenic
extract/vaccine under the tongue for 1-2 minutes followed by swallowing, has been proven to
be efficacious and safe in several double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. A recent
Cochrane Review concluded, "SLIT is a safe treatment, which significantly reduces symptoms
and medication requirements in allergic rhinitis."
Efficacy studies support the use of SLIT for the treatment of rhinitis or rhinitis and
asthma. However, dosage schedules are highly variable and optimal maintenance doses have not
yet been established. Thus, dosing studies should be designed to investigate not only the
safety profile but to determine optimal doses for maintenance therapy of patients built-up by
injection IT and for build-up regimens of previously untreated patients.
Much of the United States medical community's hesitation to embrace sublingual immunotherapy
as a viable treatment option for allergy patients has stemmed from limited information using
U. S. licensed allergenic extracts for this treatment route. Additionally, the
cost-effectiveness of one form of therapy over the other has not been clearly evaluated and
the third-party payers have not accepted SLIT for insurance coverage.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 50 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult ragweed-sensitive Subjects with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without
asthma during ragweed pollen season.
- Subjects must be 18 to 50 years of age.
- Test Subjects will have a history of moderate to severe isolated or unseasonal
allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with or without mild intermittent asthma symptoms
attributable to ragweed pollen for a minimum of 2 years before study entry.
- Subjects with or with out a history of asthma will possess FEV1 and PEF greater than
or equal to 80% predicted at the beginning of the study established by spirometry and
defined by the Knudson predicted set.
- Sensitivity to the relevant allergen will be documented by a positive skin prick test
result performed along with negative (saline) and positive (histamine) control skin
tests. A positive test will be defined as the skin reaction having the longest wheal
diameter of 5mm or greater or the longest erythema diameter of 10 mm or greater at
15-20 minutes after application.
- All female Subjects of child-bearing potential will be required to provide a urine
sample for pregnancy testing that must be negative before being allowed to participate
in the study.
- Subjects must be planning to remain in the study area during the trial (see exclusion
criteria # 14).
- Subjects must be trained on the proper use of the EpiPen, and sign the EpiPenTraining
Form before being allowed to enroll in the study.
- Subjects must be mentally and physically capable of self-administering oral drug.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects having a history of anaphylaxis or history consistent with persistent asthma
- Subjects taking antihistamines or nasal steroids medications greater than twice a week
in the months of January and/or February.
- Subjects with chronic sinusitis unstable angina, significant arrhythmia, uncontrolled
hypertension, or other chronic or immunological diseases that in the opinion of the
investigator might interfere with the evaluation of the test drug or pose additional
risk to the Subject.
- Subjects having perennial or structurally related rhinitis or rhinitis medicamentosa
(from excessive use of nasal decongestants) that will interfere with the evaluation of
symptoms due to ragweed allergy.
- Subjects with an FEV1 or PEF less than 80% predicted (moderate persistent asthma) with
or without controller medication.
- Subjects who have received an experimental drug in the 30 days prior to admission into
this study or who plan to use an experimental drug during the study.
- Subjects who have received Anti-IgE medications (Xolair) or similar compounds in the
last 12 months.
- Subjects who have received ragweed allergen immunotherapy in the last 3 years prior to
admission into this study.
- Subjects who are current users of inhaled, oral, intramuscular, intravenous
corticosteroids, tricyclic antidepressants, beta blockers, or MAO inhibitors.
- Subjects using beta-agonist more than twice a month unless being taken prior to
exercise.
- Subjects using medications that could induce adverse gastrointestinal reactions during
the study. Subjects using such medications must prove stable with no side effects for
at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Subjects refusing to sign the EpiPen Training Form will be excluded from the study.
- Pregnant or breast feeding females.
- Subjects who plan to leave the study area for more than 2 consecutive weeks during the
study.
- Subjects with a positive skin prick test to cat and/or dog, and own the pet(s) to
which they are allergic.
- Subjects who sleep during the day due to working third shift.
- Subjects unable to achieve dose #2 or higher during preliminary dosing will be
excluded.
Locations and Contacts
Sneeze, Wheeze, & Itch Associates, Normal, Illinois 61761, United States
Welborn Clinic, Evansville, Indiana 47713, United States
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
Iowa Clinical Research Corporation, Iowa City, Iowa 52240, United States
College Park Family Care Center, Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
Kansas City Allergy and Asthma, Overland Park, Kansas 66210, United States
Family Allergy and Asthma Respiratory Institute, Louisville, Kentucky 40215, United States
Clinical Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402, United States
Midwest Clinical Research, LLC, St. Louis, Missouri 63141, United States
Clinical Research of the Ozarks, Rolla, Missouri 64501, United States
Midwest Allergy and Asthma Clinic, PA, Omaha, Nebraska 68130, United States
Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, United States
Asthma, Immunology and Allergy Association, LLC, Lincoln, Nebraska 68505, United States
Ocean Allergy and Respiratory Research Center, Brick, New Jersey 08724, United States
Pulmonary and Allergy Associates, PA, Summit, New Jersey 07901, United States
Bernstein Clinical Research Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45231, United States
Allergy and Respiratory Center, Canton, Ohio 44718, United States
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, United States
Toledo Center for Clinical Research, Sylvania, Ohio 43560, United States
Oklahoma Allergy & Asthma Clinic, PC, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Research Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73120, United States
Allergy and Asthma Specialists, PC, Blue Bell, Pennsylvania 19422, United States
Asthma and Allergy Research Associates, Upland, Pennsylvania 19013, United States
Valley Clinical Research Center, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18020, United States
Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15212, United States
Vanderbilt ASAP Research, Nashville, Tennessee 08724, United States
Pharmaceutical Research & Consulting, Inc, Dallas, Texas 75231, United States
Aurora Advanced Healthcare, Inc, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53209, United States
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, United States
Allergy, Asthma and Sinus Center, SC, Greenfield, Wisconsin 53228, United States
Additional Information
Starting date: March 2008
Ending date: October 2008
Last updated: June 11, 2008
|