Acute Neurological ICU Sedation Trial (ANIST)

Condition(s) targeted: Patient Must be Under Sedation.

Intervention: Precedex (Drug); Propofol (Drug)

Phase: Phase 2

Status: Recruiting

Sponsored by: Johns Hopkins University

Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s):
Marek Mirski, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Johns Hopkins University

Overall contact:
Marek Mirski, MD, PhD, Phone: (410) 614-6121, Email: mmirski@jhmi.edu

Dexmedetomidine (Precedex, Hospira) is a “super” selective alpha2-agonist – 8-10x more avid binding to alpha2 receptors than clonidine – and may have particularly favorable characteristics as a continuous i. v. infusion sedative for critically ill neuroscience patients. Its combination of anxiolysis, analgesia, without undue lethargy may make it an ideal agent where frequent neurological examinations are important (12). Unclear, however, is whether Precedex is superior to current common i. v. sedation protocols, and if there are any undue concerns of this agent on cerebral physiology and cortical stimulation.

Official title: Acute Neurological ICU Sedation Trial (ANIST)

Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Crossover Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study

Primary outcome:

Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam

Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit

Time from initiation of study drug to calm, non-anxious state

ICP

CPP

O2 extraction via jugular bulb catheter (SjO2) or cerebral tissue oximeter

Cerebral blood flow (CBF) in a subset of patients.

Elicitation and quantification of spike or spike-wave complexes

Secondary outcome:

Therapy Intensity Level Scale (TIL)

Requirement for fluids, pressors

Toxicity/side effects

Numerical Pain Rating Scale

Need for less or more fentanyl during the infusion drug phase

Differences in sedation between Precedex and propofol in patients with known seizure disorder.

Detailed description: Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in small case series to be an efficacious sedative agent in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, in both post-surgical and medical patients (10,18-21). A recent publication reported on the efficacy in a small series of medical patients (n=12), but as part of the exclusion criteria were any serious nervous system trauma or direct CNS pathology (21).

A potential advantage of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent compared to current popular classes of drugs, particularly propofol, benzodiazepines, and narcotics, is the nominal effect on reduction of level of arousal. Experience suggests that this agent may induce effective degrees of sedation without concomitant loss of attentive behavior and cognition following low levels of auditory or tactile stimulation. Thus, neurological assessment may be preserved while achieving the goal of a non-agitated or anxious patient. Additionally, the combination of both sedative/anxiolytic and analgesic action of dexmedetomidine may permit single drug use for both sedation and pain control during the post-operative and medical ICU period.

The cerebral effects of alpha2-agonists have been modestly studied in the clinical environment, and only in normal volunteers (13). As expected, cerebral blood flow decreased following initiation of the sedative, coincident with the expected diminishment of global cerebral metabolism. No studies have evaluated dexmedetomidine in patients suffering from neurological injury, the very population that may most benefit from the agent’s sedative characteristics. Thus, it is imperative that a safety & efficacy study be carried out in a population of both medical and post-operative neuroscience patients. From an intraoperative perspective, dexmedetomidine has been effectively used as a sedative for both awake and sedation cases (1,2,4,16). Some evidence suggests prolonged cognitive deficits may persist beyond the sedative action of the drug (4).

One concern in the neuroscience patient population is laboratory evidence that alpha2-agonists may lower the seizure threshold (11). Such data has been shown for both clonidine and dexmedetomidine.

Therefore, to provide a comprehensive evaluation leading to successful safety & efficacy data for this sedative, it will be important to perform the following three studies. All three studies will be done concurrently but enrollment between the three studies will be mutually exclusive.

Study 1: Evaluation of Quality of Sedation: Does dexmedetomidine provide superior sedative characteristics relative to current standard agents in patients with neurological dysfunction? The metrics for such a study will include –

1. Pharmacodynamic ease of sedation: time to goal, required nursing interventions to goal;

2. Quality & consistency of sedation: ability to examine the patient, number of required titration interventions;

3. Rapid weaning: time to off and no residual effect both hemodynamic & neurologic;

4. Systemic hemodynamic alterations requiring drug infusion adjustment or medical intervention;

5. Side effect & toxicity of sedative infusion: neurological dysfunction – cognitive, motor, sensory; electrolyte/hematological/metabolic disturbances, alteration of drug levels.

Study 2: Alteration of Cerebral Physiology: Does Dexmedetomidine alter intracranial physiology either in a favorable or unfavorable manner? The metrics for such a study will include –

1. Measures of intracranial pressure (ICP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP);

2. Cognitive neurological state;

3. Cerebral saturation (venous) or direct cerebral oximetry (oxygen tissue level) in a subset population with specific intracranial device.

Study 3: Alteration of Seizure Threshold Potential: Does Dexmedetomidine, using clinical sedation infusion rates, reduce the seizure threshold or induce pre-ictal EEG changes in normal and seizure-prone patients? The metrics for such a study will include –

1. Continuous scalp or epidural EEG monitoring in patients with seizure disorder;

2. Both hemispheres – normal and affected by seizures will be monitored to compare effects of sedative agents on “normal” vs. epileptic foci.

Minimum age: 18 Years. Maximum age: 80 Years. Gender(s): Both.

Criteria:

Study 1: Inclusion Criteria:

Neuroscience patients in the NCCU who are:

1. 18-80 years of age;

2. Mechanically ventilated patients;

3. Requiring continuous sedation for a minimum of 9-11 hours (depending on whether or not pt is post-operative), yet frequent neurological examinations or Patients with a NICSS score > 0

4. Patient or family able to provide consent.

5. Considered to have guarded yet stable neurological state. Not fluctuating intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), or ongoing known cerebral ischemia if ICP monitoring in place.

Study 1: Exclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnancy.

2. ICP> 30 mm Hg despite therapy if ICP monitored.

3. CPP <70 mm Hg if monitored.

4. Occurrence of: new cerebral stroke, hemorrhage, or change in edema by CT, increase in ICP if monitored.

5. Neuromuscular paralysis.

6. Non-functional cognitive exam – not following commands.

7. Renal insufficiency: Serum Creatinine >2. 0 mg/dl or estimated Cr Clearance <40. 0 ml/min.

8. Hepatic disease: AST, ALT > 300, or INR > 1. 7 not on anticoagulants.

9. Severe COPD with baseline arterial pCO2>50.

10. Suspected alcohol or substance withdrawal.

11. Hypotension – requiring pressor therapy to maintain baseline adequate CPP or mean arterial pressure.

12. Cardiac arrhythmia – sinus bradycardia (HR <60), atrial fibrillation (>6 PVC’s/min)

13. Bradycardia- heart rate less than 60 beats per minute.

14. Patient does not require mechanical ventilation.

Study 2: Inclusion Criteria:

Critically ill neuroscience patients who are:

1. 18-80 years of age;

2. Mechanically ventilated;

3. Require Intracranial Pressure (ICP) monitoring by either subarachnoid bolt (SA bolt), or by an Intra-Ventricular Catheter (IVC).

4. Amenable for placement of intra-cerebral oxygen sensor or jugular bulb catheter.

5. Have GCS score > 5 that requires sedation.

6. Requiring continuous sedation for minimum of 9-11 hours (depending on whether or not pt is post-operative) , yet frequent neurological examinations every 1-2 hours or Patients with a NICSS score > 0

7. Patient or family able to provide consent.

Study 2: Exclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnancy;

2. ICP> 30 mm Hg despite therapy;

3. CPP <70 mm Hg;

4. Occurrence of: new cerebral stroke, hemorrhage, or change in edema by CT, increase in ICP if monitored.

5. Continuous neuromuscular paralysis

6. Renal insufficiency: Serum Creatinine >2. 0 mg/dl or estimated Cr <40. 0 Clearance ml/min.

7. Hepatic disease: AST, ALT > 300, or INR > 1. 7 not on anticoagulants.

8. Severe COPD with baseline arterial pCO2>50.

9. Suspected alcohol or substance withdrawal.

Study 3: Inclusion Criteria:

Critically ill neuroscience patients who are:

1. 18-80 years of age;

2. Requiring continuous sedation for minimum of 9-11 hrs (depending on whether or not pt is post-operative), yet frequent neurological examinations or Patients with a NICSS score >0

3. Patient or family able to provide consent.

4. Mechanically ventilated patients;

5. Considered to have guarded yet stable neurological state. Not fluctuating ICP, CPP, or ongoing known cerebral ischemia.

6. Presence of intra-operatively placed GRID electrode array or patients requiring continuous EEG monitoring.

Study 3: Exclusion Criteria:

1. Pregnancy

2. Occurrence of: new cerebral stroke, hemorrhage, or change in edema by CT, increase in ICP if monitored.

3. Continuous neuromuscular paralysis

4. Renal insufficiency: Serum Creatinine >2. 0 or Cr Clearance <40. 0

5. Hepatic insufficiency: AST, ALT> 300, or PT time > 1. 7 not on anticoagulants.

6. Severe COPD with baseline arterial pCO2>50.

7. Suspected alcohol or substance withdrawal.

Marek Mirski, MD, PhD, Phone: (410) 614-6121, Email: mmirski@jhmi.edu

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21287, United States; Recruiting
Marek Mirski, MD, PhD, Principal Investigator

Last updated: October 19, 2006