Safety of Continuous Potassium Chloride Infusion in Critical Care
Information source: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on November 03, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Hypokalemia; Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Intervention: Potassium chloride (Drug); Potassium chloride (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Not yet recruiting
Sponsored by: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Richard Chalwin, MBChB, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: The Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Summary
Patients in critical care often require supplemental potassium chloride if levels in their
blood are below acceptable level. Common practice is to administer a single dose of potassium
chloride under controlled conditions via a drip, before checking if a further dose is
required. The purpose of this study is to ensure that it is safe to administer potassium
chloride continuously with the dose varied according to patient needs.
Clinical Details
Official title: Assessing the Safety of a Continuous Potassium Chloride Infusion in Critical Care: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Dose Comparison, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Adherence to a potassium level 4.0 - 4.5mmol/L
Secondary outcome: Total quantity of potassium administeredIncidence of potassium level < 3.0mmol/L and > 5.5mmol/L Incidence of arrhythmia Number of arterial blood gases taken
Detailed description:
The use of potassium supplementation is commonplace in the critical care environment.
Patients often have abnormal serum potassium levels due to active disease processes.
Conditions such as acute renal failure and metabolic acidosis precipitate hyperkalaemia, with
ileus and insensible losses causing hypokalaemia. Both hypo- and hyperkalaemia can cause
life-threatening arrythmias so it is prudent to rectify aberrant levels.
The standard treatment of hypokalaemia in intensive care units is by intravenous
administration of potassium chloride. This can be given either as a dilute solution as
maintenance intravenous fluid therapy, or as a concentrated solution by intermittent
infusion. Alternatively potassium can be given as a concentrated solution by continuous
infusion. All techniques require regular monitoring of the patient's serum potassium level
with appropriate alterations to the administration regime.
From a theoretical standpoint it would make sense to give potassium by continuous infusion as
this allow slow but steady correction of hypokalaemia. A continuous infusion should prevent
rapid fluctuations in the serum level that could be caused by intermittent infusions, which
may precipitate arrhythmia. However continuous infusions require vigilant monitoring to
ensure that hyperkalaemia does not occur and must be given into a central vein to avoid the
risk of phlebitis.
The use of intermittent infusions has been used safely in the critical care setting under
physician guidance. A retrospective review reported the outcomes of the administration of 495
infusion sets to 190 individuals. While they identified 2 instances of post-infusion
hyperkalaemia, neither was associated with any adverse sequelae. Analysis showed a no
correlation between serum potassium increase post-infusion and serum creatinine, thus
advocating the use of this therapy in patients with renal failure. In light of this valuable
safety data, they proceeded with a prospective cohort study involving 40 patients on their
Intensive Care Unit. Again the outcomes were favourable with a mean increase of 0. 48mmol/L
after administration of 20mmol in 100ml of saline over 1 hour. They reported no instances of
hyperkalaemia, and data suggested a decreased instance of ectopic beats versus control
patients.
The use of a variable dose regime dictated by serum potassium concentration has also been
assessed. In a prospective cohort study 20, 30 or 40mmol was administered over 1 hour to 48
patients based on their initial measured potassium level. They only reported 2 instances of
hyperkalaemia but neither patient experienced any complications. Usefully they found that
patients with oliguric renal failure (creatinine 283 ± 127 micromol/L) had no greater mean
increase in potassium level after infusion than patients with normal creatinine clearance.
Two other methods have been suggested. The first, assessed on a paediatric intensive care
unit, administered potassium at a rate of 0. 25mmol/kg/hr to patients with serum potassium <
3. 5mmol/L and ECG abnormalities. The infusion was continued until the ECG abnormalities were
corrected. Serum potassium wasn't measured until after completing the infusion, and although
the mean increase was only 0. 75mmol/L, this method did expose patients to a risk of
unmonitored hyperkalaemia. The other involves use of a feedback system with a
computer-algorithm driven protocol. This method was not developed into a full production
model due to lack of cost-effectiveness.
We were unable to find any trials assessing the efficacy and safety of continuous potassium
infusions in the critical care population, so felt it was time this was rectified. Critically
ill patients are often hypokalaemic due to insensible losses, inadequate supplementation
prior to admission, and use of diuretics and beta-agonists. At the same time they often have
acute and/or chronic renal failure or may have a metabolic acidosis that will hamper normal
potassium sequestration or excretion. Thus they are at risk of rapidly developing
life-threatening hyperkalaemia if supplementation is not carefully titrated against serial
monitoring. Continuous infusions administered with due vigilance should allow for correction
of hypokalaemia in a safe and precise manner.
Our department used to supplement potassium by intermittent infusion, but after internal
discussion we have successfully implemented a continuous infusion protocol. We propose that
continuous infusions administered by accredited nurses under physician direction can safely
deliver potassium and correct abnormal levels.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any inpatient on the investigating unit with a serum potassium level of less than
3. 8mmol/L
- arterial line for blood sampling and central venous access for infusion administration
in situ
- continuous 12-lead ECG monitoring
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a serum potassium ≥ 3. 8mmol/L
- Renal dysfunction with serum creatinine 50% greater than the upper end of the normal
reference range (i. e.: > 180micromol/L) or urine output less than 0. 5ml/kg/hr for 6
consecutive hours, or the requirement for dialysis
- Burns
- Hypomagnesaemia (≤ 0. 7mmol/L), however patients may be enrolled after the
hypomagnesaemia is corrected
Locations and Contacts
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia 5011, Australia
Additional Information
Starting date: August 2008
Ending date: December 2008
Last updated: July 16, 2008
|