Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project (MITI)
Information source: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Cardiovascular Diseases; Coronary Disease; Heart Diseases; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Ischemia
Intervention: tissue plasminogen activator (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Summary
To determine the practicality, benefit, and safety of paramedic administration of
thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The feasibility of paramedics
correctly identifying candidates for thrombolytic therapy following myocardial infarction was
assessed in Phase I. In Phase II, pre-hospital thrombolytic therapy was compared with
in-hospital thrombolytic therapy.
Clinical Details
Study design: Treatment
Detailed description:
BACKGROUND:
In the past, patients with acute myocardial infarction were treated by putting them to bed.
It was felt that once the symptoms and electrocardiographic signs of acute myocardial
infarction had occurred, the process was complete and that the heart and patient at rest
would allow the illness to run its course and the heart to heal. The focus of treatment in
the Coronary Intensive Care Unit was to prevent complications of acute myocardial infarction,
primarily arrhythmias leading to cardiac arrest and the treatment of cardiac arrest itself.
Acute phase morbidity and mortality related to loss of myocardium through infarction has not
changed. Post-discharge mortality and morbidity is, in large part, related to the occurrence
of congestive heart failure, secondary to loss of myocardium to infarction. Efforts to
preserve myocardium through pharmacologic intervention to limit demand, have not resulted in
significant benefit. It is now recognized that the infarction is not complete on
presentation, that it occurs as a wavefront over a period of four to six hours, and that in
80 to 90 percent of patients, infarction is due to thrombus in the infarct-related artery.
Therefore, reperfusion of the jeopardized myocardium during this window of four to six hours
could result in salvage of myocardium with resultant decrease in acute mortality as well as
acute and chronic morbidity and mortality from myocardial failure.
The international streptokinase trials have established the feasibility of intravenous
coronary thrombolysis with streptokinase and demonstrated a decrease in acute morality
ranging from 18 percent to 50 percent, depending upon the interval between the onset of chest
pain and the initiation of thrombolytic therapy. Furthermore, preservation of ventricular
function, as reflected in ejection fraction, is greater with early administration.
The TIMI trial of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA), which is more clot-specific than
streptokinase, has substantiated the effectiveness. The initiation of thrombolytic therapy
with TPA as early as possible after the onset of symptoms offers an advantage, therefore, in
terms of both a reduction in acute mortality and salvage of ischemic myocardium.
Although thrombolysis is being performed at community hospitals or enroute to hospitals by
specially trained teams using helicopter transport, only one major study has been reported
which has systematically evaluated the benefit of early on-the-scene thrombolysis. This
study documented significant benefit in terms of salvage of myocardium over those patients in
whom thrombolytic therapy was initiated after arrival in the hospital, as a direct function
of time. This program used physicians in the ambulance to evaluate indications for and
contraindications to thrombolytic therapy in the field. The proposed study would evaluate
the ability of paramedics, under physician remote control, to accurately evaluate patients in
the field in terms of indications and contra-indications to thrombolytic therapy, and to
assess the possible benefit in terms of salvage of myocardium in those patients being
transported to the hospital by paramedic squads as opposed to those arriving by ordinary
means.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
In Phase I, the paramedics took electrocardiograms of patients who met the definition of
cases and administered an abbreviated questionnaire. This phase tested the feasibility of
paramedics making a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction on the basis of clinical history
and with the support of computerized electrocardiogram, coming to an appropriate decision to
initiate thrombolytic therapy on the basis of the field database, and recognizing appropriate
contraindications to thrombolytic therapy with and without remote physician supervision. An
analysis was conducted of the pre-hospital selection of patients for thrombolytic therapy.
Criteria for approval to move to Phase II included correct identification of appropriate
cases for treatment 75 percent of the time, less than five percent inappropriate cases or
with contraindications for thrombolytic therapy, and no more than one percent of the selected
cases found to have initial life-threatening hemorrhagic conditions.
Beginning in November 1988, Phase II compared initiation of thrombolysis with tissue
plasminogen activator (TPA) in the field to initiation in the hospital. During Phase II,
which lasted for 24 months, one half of the patients meeting the case definition received
paramedic administration of intravenous thrombolytic therapy and one half received the same
pre-hospital diagnostic steps but treatment administered after transport to the hospital.
The 360 patients with symptoms for six hours or less, no risk factors for serious bleeding,
and ST-segment elevation, were selected by paramedics and a remote physician for inclusion in
the trial. They were allocated to aspirin and alteplase treatment initiated before or after
hospital arrival. Intravenous sodium heparin was administered to both groups in the
hospital. Nineteen hospitals in the Seattle and King County areas participated. The primary
endpoint was a ranked composite score (combining death, stroke, serious bleeding, and infarct
size). The relation between time to treatment and outcome (composite score, infarct size,
ejection fraction, and mortality) was also assessed.
In Phase II, a myocardial infarction registry was established to include all patients
hospitalized in the area with a discharge diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The
registry placed the trial findings in a community-based perspective and aided in the
interpretation of trial findings by assessing the proportion of cases seeking paramedic care
and determining the characteristics of these patients in contrast to those arriving at the
hospital by other means. The records of all patients admitted directly to coronary care
units in Seattle and King County were surveyed. Study personnel examined differences, if
any, between paramedic and other transport groups regarding clinical history, treatment,
complications, and hospital discharge rates. Of the cases in the registry, 300 who arrived
at the hospital by means other than paramedic transport were compared to the
paramedic-transported cases with respect to the incidence of new Q-wave infarction on the
first and last electrocardiogram, an interview to determine onset, severity, and duration of
symptoms, and reasons for choosing one type of care over the other during the emergency
situation.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 35 Years.
Maximum age: 71 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Men and women, ages 35 to 71, with chest pain of between 15 minutes and 6 hours duration,
systolic blood pressure of more than 80 mm Hg and less than 200 mm Hg, and a diastolic
blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg. (Phase I).
Men and women with m
Locations and Contacts
Additional Information
Related publications: Every NR, Parsons LS, Hlatky M, Martin JS, Weaver WD. A comparison of thrombolytic therapy with primary coronary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1996 Oct 24;335(17):1253-60. Every NR, Maynard C, Cochran RP, Martin J, Weaver WD. Characteristics, management, and outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with bypass surgery. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Investigators. Circulation. 1996 Nov 1;94(9 Suppl):II81-6. Weaver WD, Eisenberg MS, Martin JS, Litwin PE, Shaeffer SM, Ho MT, Kudenchuk P, Hallstrom AP, Cerqueira MD, Copass MK, et al. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project--phase I: patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Apr;15(5):925-31. Martin JS, Litwin PE, Weaver WD. Early recognition and treatment of the patient suffering from acute myocardial infarction. A description of the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project. Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 1990 Dec;2(4):681-8. Kennedy JW, Weaver WD. The potential for prehospital thrombolytic therapy. Clin Cardiol. 1990 Aug;13(8 Suppl 8):VIII23-6. Kudenchuk PJ, Ho MT, Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Cobb LA, Kennedy JW. Accuracy of computer-interpreted electrocardiography in selecting patients for thrombolytic therapy. MITI Project Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Jun;17(7):1486-91. Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Eisenberg MS, Ho MT, Cobb LA, Kennedy JW, Wirkus MS. Effect of age on use of thrombolytic therapy and mortality in acute myocardial infarction. The MITI Project Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991 Sep;18(3):657-62. Maynard C, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Cerqueira M, Kudenchuk PJ, Ho MT, Kennedy JW, Cobb LA, Schaeffer SM, Hallstrom AP, et al. Characteristics of black patients admitted to coronary care units in metropolitan Seattle: results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry (MITI). Am J Cardiol. 1991 Jan 1;67(1):18-23. Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE, Weaver WD. A method of assigning scores to the components of a composite outcome: an example from the MITI trial. Control Clin Trials. 1992 Apr;13(2):148-55. Maynard C, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Gender differences in the treatment and outcome of acute myocardial infarction. Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry. Arch Intern Med. 1992 May;152(5):972-6. Every NR, Larson EB, Litwin PE, Maynard C, Fihn SD, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Martin JS, Weaver WD. The association between on-site cardiac catheterization facilities and the use of coronary angiography after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):546-51. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Kudenchuk PJ, Eisenberg M. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993 Sep 8;270(10):1211-6. Longstreth WT Jr, Litwin PE, Weaver WD. Myocardial infarction, thrombolytic therapy, and stroke. A community-based study. The MITI Project Group. Stroke. 1993 Apr;24(4):587-90. Maynard C, Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Kudenchuk PJ, Dewhurst TA, Eisenberg MS, Hallstrom AP, Chambers J. Hospital mortality in acute myocardial infarction in the era of reperfusion therapy (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project). Am J Cardiol. 1993 Oct 15;72(12):877-82. Weaver WD, Litwin PE, Martin JS. Use of direct angioplasty for treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction in hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery. The Myocardial Infarction, Triage, and Intervention Project Investigators. Circulation. 1993 Nov;88(5 Pt 1):2067-75. Every NR, Fihn SD, Maynard C, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Resource utilization in treatment of acute myocardial infarction: staff-model health maintenance organization versus fee-for-service hospitals. The MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Aug;26(2):401-6. Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Martin JS, Wirkus M, Weaver WD. Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry) Am J Cardiol. 1996 Jul 1;78(1):9-14. Every NR, Spertus J, Fihn SD, Hlatky M, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Length of hospital stay after acute myocardial infarction in the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Aug;28(2):287-93. Brouwer MA, Martin JS, Maynard C, Wirkus M, Litwin PE, Verheugt FW, Weaver WD. Influence of early prehospital thrombolysis on mortality and event-free survival (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention [MITI] Randomized Trial). MITI Project Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1996 Sep 1;78(5):497-502. Spertus JA, Weiss NS, Every NR, Weaver WD. The influence of clinical risk factors on the use of angiography and revascularization after acute myocardial infarction. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project Investigators. Arch Intern Med. 1995 Nov 27;155(21):2309-16. Maynard C, Every NR, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Outcomes in African-American women with suspected acute myocardial infarction: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Project. J Natl Med Assoc. 1995 May;87(5):339-44. Every NR, Parsons LS, Fihn SD, Larson EB, Maynard C, Hallstrom AP, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Long-term outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients admitted to hospitals with and without on-site cardiac catheterization facilities. MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention. Circulation. 1997 Sep 16;96(6):1770-5. Maynard C, Every NR, Martin JS, Weaver WD. Long-term implications of racial differences in the use of revascularization procedures (the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention registry). Am Heart J. 1997 Jun;133(6):656-62. Kudenchuk PJ, Maynard C, Cobb LA, Wirkus M, Martin JS, Kennedy JW, Weaver WD. Utility of the prehospital electrocardiogram in diagnosing acute coronary syndromes: the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention (MITI) Project. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Jul;32(1):17-27. Scull GS, Martin JS, Weaver WD, Every NR. Early angiography versus conservative treatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute myocardial infarction: MITI Investigators. Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Mar 15;35(4):895-902. Maynard C, Martin JS, Hallstrom AP, Weaver WD. Changes in the Use of Thrombolytic Therapy in Seattle Area Hospitals from 1988 to 1992: Results from the Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 1995;1(2):195-199. Kim C, Schaaf CH, Maynard C, Every NR. Unstable angina in the myocardial infarction triage and intervention registry (MITI): short- and long-term outcomes in men and women. Am Heart J. 2001 Jan;141(1):73-7.
Starting date: April 1988
Ending date: March 1992
Last updated: June 23, 2005
|
