Efficacy/Safety Study of Amaryl®M 1/500 mg Twice Daily Versus Amaryl® 4 mg Both in Combination With Lantus® in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Information source: Handok Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Intervention: glimepiride + insulin glargine (Amaryl + Lantus) (Drug); glimepiride/metformin fixed combination+insulin glargine (AmarylM + Lantus) (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Handok Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Kang S Park, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Eulji University Hospital
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of Amaryl®M 1/500 mg twice daily
versus Amaryl® 4 mg both in combination with Lantus® once-daily regimen in type 2 Diabetes
Mellitus patients with inadequate glycemic control.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Multi-center, Open, Randomized, Parallel-group, 2 Arm Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Amaryl®M 1/500mg Twice Daily Versus Amaryl® 4mg Both in Combination With Lantus® Once-daily Regimen in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients With Inadequate Glycemic Control
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to the last visit
Secondary outcome: Mean change in FPG, insulin, c-peptide from baseline to the last visit Safety; Episodes of hypoglycemia & other adverse eventsResponse rate based on HbA1c and FPG levels measured at the last visit Mean change in Lantus® dose from baseline to the last visit Compliance Frequency with hypoglycemic episode Adverse events
Detailed description:
There are several kinds of oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) that are used in the treatment of
patients with type 2 DM. Among them, sulfonylurea and metformin are well-established
first-line OADs. However, as the beta cell dysfunction progresses over time, patients fail
to achieve good glycemic control with OADs alone and need further treatment intensification,
usually involving the introduction of insulin either alone or in combination with OADs. Now,
an OAD combined with bedtime insulin is one of the recommended treatment options for
patients with type 2 DM and OAD failure. But, it still remains unclear which OADs are the
most effective in combination with insulin for the treatment of type 2 DM.
so, this study we will be able to verify which OADs are the most effective in combination
with insulin for the treatment of type 2 DM.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 20 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients over 20 years old with type 2 DM
- Patients with inadequate glycemic control despite continuous use of tolerable or
maximal doses of one or more OADs for 3months or more.
- 7%
- 21 kg/m2 ≤ BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2
- Patents who need insulin add-on therapy based on investigator's discretion
- Patients who would give the informed consent
- Patients who can perform SMBG and record the data on the patient's diary
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of acute metabolic complications such as diabetic ketoacidosis or
hyperosmolar nonketotic coma within 3 months before screening
- Pregnant or lactating females
- History of drug or alcohol abuse
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to glimepiride, metformin HCL or insulin
- Night-shift workers
- Patients who are under insulin therapy at screening
- Treatment with any investigational products in the last 3 months before screening
- Clinically significant laboratory abnormality on screening labs or any medical
condition that would affect the completion or outcome of the study based on
investigator's decision
- Patients with serum creatinine level > 1. 5 mg/dl in male and > 1. 4 mg/dl in female
- Patients with ALT or AST > 3x ULN
Locations and Contacts
HeeYoung Lee, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Additional Information
Starting date: May 2009
Last updated: March 26, 2013
|