Anterior Shoulder US - a New Access
Information source: Rambam Health Care Campus
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Rheumatoid Arthritis
Phase: N/A
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Rambam Health Care Campus Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Alexander Rozin, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Rambam Health Care Campus and Technion
Overall contact: Alexander Rozin, MD, Phone: 972-48542268, Email: a_rozin@rambam.health.gov.il
Summary
1. Investigate Gleno-Humeral Joint (GHJ) by anterior approach:
A - Measurement of GHJ thickness at 3 points and average value calculation on body
supine position and with arm supinated, maximal externally rotated with elbow angle 90
degrees
- By longitudinal access with transducer position laterally to coracoids along to
the GHJ line, located as diagonal form lower to forward and lateral direction with
demonstration the joint cartilage posteriorly and subscapular tendon anteriorly
(Fig. 4)
- By transversal access with 90 degrees to longitudinal and at 3 points: upper with
coracoids visualization, middle and lower (Fig. 5-7).
B - Measurement of rotator interval with assessment of width and higher.
2. Comparison of the data with results of classic values have been received by posterior
and inferior (axillar) approach.
3. Comparison of the results between patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and healthy
controls
Clinical Details
Official title: US Investigation of Gleno-humeral Joint by Anterior Access With Measurement of Rotator Interval in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Healthy Controls
Study design: Observational Model: Case Control, Time Perspective: Prospective
Primary outcome: Measurement of GHJ thickness and of rotator interval
Secondary outcome: Data of comparison between measurement of GHJ in anterior and axillar access and anterior and posterior access in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and Controls.Data of comparison in measurement of rotator interval in patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis and controls.
Detailed description:
US scan was shown to be effective and useful for investigation of shoulder diseases. It is
easy to implement and return, not expensive and not invasive, and precise for assessment.
Glenohumeral joint is most inspected in elderly population. Most of shoulder syndromes are
not related to joint diseases, but to adjacent tissue problem. However, US is preferred
method for assessment GHJ by rheumatologists. But inflammatory changes in GHJ found limited
attention in medical imaging literature. So far there is assessment of GHJ synovitis with
disclosure of synovial fluid and pannus in subdeltoid (subacromial) bursa and biceps tendon,
connected to GHJ space, by axillar and posterior access. Subdeltoid bursitis and biceps
tenosynovitis are common used for inflammatory assessment of the shoulder. Anterior approach
for GHJ assessment has not been used before our last trial. A problem of patients with
synovitis in GHJ is difficulties to pick up shoulder to lateral side (abduction) till 90
degrees for axillar approach. We proposed anterior access for GHJ synovitis assessment.
Certain position of the shoulder and measured data of healthy controls enabled diagnostic of
GHJ synovitis with minimal movement of ill shoulder. In other report we showed US
differences between GHJ and subscapular tendon on the anterior approach. These two
publications showed anterior shoulder US in sitting position with arm externally rotated and
supinated. We should recognize problems of these trials related to wrong identification of
GHJ space. As we realized later this incorrect detection was associated with missing two
orienteer structures: GHJ cartilage located behind and subcscapular tendon situated forward
to GHJ space. From our present view, these two criteria are corn stone for GHJ
visualization. Because lack obvious picture of these 2 structures GHJ demonstration is
unclear and exposed to confusion with subscapular tendon. Moreover, our further experience
of multiple anterior US studies showed that presentation of GHJ in position for supination
and external rotation in sitting position is associated with poor visualization of GHJ
cavity. The reason is position of GHJ to be hidden behind humeral head due to differences
between round humeral head and oval glenoid and twist GHJ structure forward-upper-laterally.
Daily practice helped to resolve the problem. We found: a patient should be laid down
supine, his elbow is bent to 90 degrees and the shoulder is rotated maximally externally.
This condition is associated to fix shoulder girdle, glenoid move anteriorly, humeral head
move posteriorly, and much more complete external shoulder rotation is achieved opening GHJ
for investigation. Shoulder CT shows that glenoid surface is in plane open to upper, forward
and lateral side. It obligates to turn of transducer according to direction of investigated
joint placed along the glenoid surface. That means, longitudinal study of GHJ requests
transducer position under certain angle along to joint line. Transversal study is
implemented under angle 90 degree to the joint line. Other problem is that synovitis may
developed at early stage only within limited region of the joint and in region much more
susceptible to inflammation and dilatation, like that rotator interval: anterior upper
region which is covered only by the joint capsule with lower resistance to distention. That
region is referred as rotator interval, a distance between supraspinatus (laterally) and
subcapularis (medially) tendons attachment, when shoulder supinated and externally rotated.
This region has been recently used for synovial biopsy.
Materials and methods:
US will be performed for 20 healthy controls and 20 patients with RA. US scan will be
fulfilled symmetric both sides. Diagnosis RA is relied on anamnesis data, physical
examination, and laboratory findings. Synovial swelling, synovial tenderness, local fever of
joint region, active and passive limitation, accelerated erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR)
upper 40mm/hr (N<12), C reactive protein (CRP) upper 1. 5mg/dl (N<0. 5) were clinical signs of
active inflammation. Twenty healthy controls did not complain of shoulder pain and
limitation and their physical examination was unremarkable.
Study process:
US scan will be performed as prospective study for 20 healthy controls from department of
preventive medicine and for 20 patients with RA age of 20-60 by to classic approaches:
posterior and inferior and new anterior access. The last was accompanied by measurement of
GHJ space and rotator interval in upper limb position of supination and external rotation.
Comparison will be implemented between data of different positions and RA patients compared
with controls.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 20 Years.
Maximum age: 60 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Healthy controls age of 20-60 according to conclusion of preventive medicine
department
2. Patients with RA according to ARA 1987 revised criteria and disease activity DAS 3-5
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Past shoulder trauma
2. Shoulder osteoarthritis
3. Rotator cuff disorders
4. Shoulder injections
5. Cervical spondylosis with nerve root compression, Cervical symptomatic disc syndromes
Locations and Contacts
Alexander Rozin, MD, Phone: 972-48542268, Email: a_rozin@rambam.health.gov.il
Rheumatology unit, Haifa 31096, Israel; Recruiting Alexander Rozin, MD, Phone: 972-48542268, Email: a_rozin@rambam.health.gov.il Amir Dagan, MD, Sub-Investigator Kohava Toledano, MD, Sub-Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: December 2012
Last updated: May 4, 2014
|