A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of Slow Release Hydromorphone HCL for Treatment of Patients With Osteoarthritis
Information source: Alza Corporation, DE, USA
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Osteoarthritis, Hip; Osteoarthritis, Knee
Intervention: OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Alza Corporation, DE, USA Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Alza Corporation Clinical Trial, Study Director, Affiliation: Alza Corporation, DE, USA
Summary
The purpose of this study was to compare the analgesic (a drug that relieves pain)
effectiveness and safety of OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) 8 mg and 16 mg to placebo
(no drug) in patients with osteroarthritis (OA).
Clinical Details
Official title: A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Fixed-Dose, Parallel Group Comparison of Controlled-Release Hydromorphone HCI vs Placebo in Subjects With Osteoarthritis
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Time-interval weighted AUC pain ratio (AUC/by an individual's maximum possible benefit AUC)using Baseline Observation Carried Forward imputation(up to Week 12); AUC was the cumulative pain intensity differences from baseline (titration and maintenance).
Secondary outcome: WOMAC pain subscale for the AUC ratio and change from baseline at each time point.; Index score and other subscale analyzed using the AUC ratio and change from baseline (no imputation, BOCF and LOCF imputation); Other included MOS Sleep Scale.
Detailed description:
This was a phase 3, randomized (patients are assigned different treatments based on chance),
placebo-controlled, double-blind, fixed-dose, parallel-group, multicenter study in adult
patients with OA (osteroarthritis) who were unable to consistently control or treat their
pain with nonopioid medications, or who had received an opioid for treatment of pain.
Eligible patients were randomized in an equal ratio to receive 1 of 3 treatments: OROS
hydromorphone HCI (slow release) 8mg, OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) 16 mg, or placebo
(no drug). All patients could take acetaminophen (less than or equal to 2000 mg per day) as
rescue medication for osteoarthritic pain. Rescue medication was not permitted during the
washout period or 6 hours before an assessment of effectiveness. The study was comprised of
the following periods: an analgesic (pain reliever) taper and washout period (less than or
equal to 2 weeks), a Titration (increase)Phase (less than or equal to 16 days), a Maintenance
Phase (12 weeks), and a study drug taper period (less than or equal to 1 week). At the end
of the washout period, all patients received OROS hydromorphone HCI (slow release) 8 mg or
matching placebo to be taken once daily. After 1 week, patients were to return to the study
site and receive new supplies of study drug. During the second week of titration (increase),
patients randomized to the OROS hydromorphone (slow release) 16 mg group had their dose
increased from 8 mg daily to 16 mg daily of OROS hydromorphone (slow release). No dose
adjustments were allowed. After completing the Maintenance Phase or upon early termination,
study drug was tapered for up to 1 week as follows: one 8 mg tablet or placebo once daily for
the first 2 days then taken every other day as appropriate to taper off the study medication.
Safety assessments of physical examination, vital signs, labs and adverse event reporting
were done at baseline, termination throughout the study. The primary measurement was the
time-interval weighted area under the curve(AUC) divided by the maximum AUC benefit possible
for an individual. The AUC was a measure of cumulative pain intensity differences from
baseline for the Titration and Maintenance phases. At termination, patients were assigned
their baseline pain value for the remainder of the trial, baseline observation carried
forward (BOCF) or the last available pain value for the remainder of the trial, last
observation carried forward (LOCF). Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index
(WOMAC) overall index score, physical function, joint stiffness subscales were analyzed using
the AUC ratio and change from baseline using no imputation, and the baseline observation
carried forward (BOCF) and last observation carried forward (LOCF) imputation methods. The
medical outcome study (MOS) sleep scale was also analyzed per protocol.
OROS hydromorphone (slow release) 8 mg and 16 mg tablets and placebo taken orally once daily
for 17 weeks
Eligibility
Minimum age: 21 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and be postmenopausal for at
least 1 year or surgically sterile or practicing a medically recognized contraceptive
program
- Patient has been diagnosed with Functional Class I-III Osteoarthritis of the knee or
hip
- Patient has required treatment of target joint pain within the 90 days prior to study
start and met at least one of the following: was unable to consistently control target
joint pain with non-opioid pain reliever, unable to treat target joint pain with
non-opioid pain reliever because treatment was contraindicated per investigator
judgement, or had received an opioid(single or combination product) for treatment of
target joint pain, with the equivalent of less than or equal to 40 mg/day of oral
morphine sulfate, inclusive of breakthrough pain medication
- Patient has reported a target joint pain score of at least 5 (11-point Likert Scale)
at baseline
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient for whom hydromorphone was contraindicated because of a documented history of
an allergic reaction (hives, rash, etc) or a clinically significant intolerance to
hydromorphone or other opioids
- Patient requiring treatment with monoamine oxidase inhibitors, or receiving systemic
chemotherapy or had an active malignancy of any type or had clinically significant
abnormalities in clinical chemistry, hematology or urinalysis, or had a documented
history of gout, pseudogout, Paget's disease, fibromyalgia
- Uncontrolled inflammatory arthritis or NSAID-dependent inflammatory arthritis or any
chronic pain syndrome that could interfere with the assessment of pain and/or other
symptoms of osteoarthritis
- Patient who is pregnant and/or breastfeeding
- Patient with a documented history of drug abuse/dependence/misuse or naracotic
analgesic abuse/dependence/misuse, or unable to discontinue all formulations of prior
pain medications (opioid and/or non-opioid) during the washout period of the study
- Patient who had a documented history of a medical condition, which, in the
investigator's opinion, could compromise the patient's ability to swallow, absorb,
metabolize, or excrete study drug, including (but not limited to) intractable nausea
and/or vomiting, and/or severe gastrointestinal narrowing
Locations and Contacts
Additional Information
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Fixed-Dose, Parallel-group Comparison of Controlled-Release Hydromorphone HCl vs. Placebo in Patients with Osteoarthritis
Ending date: May 2005
Last updated: March 21, 2008
|