Lubricant Versus Lidocaine Gel for Pain Control During Urodynamics
Information source: University of Southern California
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 23, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Pelvic Floor Disorders
Intervention: 2% lidocaine gel (Drug); Water based lubricant (Drug)
Phase: N/A
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: University of Southern California Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Vanessa Sun, M.D., Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of Southern California
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine a difference in patient reported pain levels
before, during, and after multichannel urodynamics in patients treated with 2% lidocaine gel
or water based lubricant. We hypothesize that lidocaine gel will decrease pain levels when
compared to lubricant gel.
Clinical Details
Official title: Use of 2% Lidocaine Gel Versus Water Based Lubrication: Is There a Difference in Pain During and After Multi-channel Urodynamics?
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Pain During the Pelvic Floor Examination
Secondary outcome: Embarrassment With Pelvic Floor Examination
Detailed description:
The evaluation of the incontinent patient usually includes in and out catheterization for
post void residual urinary volume, a cotton tipped swab test, and urodynamic testing. All
of these evaluations require manipulation of the urethra by either a catheter or a cotton
tipped swab. To minimize discomfort, water based lubricant or 2% lidocaine gel is often
used to ease passage of the device into the urethra. In 2008, Harmanli et al. performed a
randomized control trial showing use of 2% lidocaine gel significantly decreased pain during
the cotton tipped swab test and in and out catheterization. However, data looking at
cystourethroscopy in women suggests that 2% lidocaine gel does little to relieve discomfort
over lubricant alone. There are no studies looking at whether 2% lidocaine gel decreases
the pain associated with multichannel urodynamic testing when compared to using lubricant
alone. The purpose of this study is to determine a difference in patient reported pain
levels before, during, and after multichannel urodynamics in patients treated with 2%
lidocaine gel or water based lubricant. We hypothesize that lidocaine gel will decrease pain
levels when compared to lubricant gel.
This study design is a prospective double blinded randomized controlled trial.
Participants will be randomized to the 2% lidocaine gel or the lubricant gel group after
informed consent is obtained and immediately before undergoing multichannel urodynamics.
Sequentially numbered sealed opaque envelopes containing the identity of the study arm will
be used for randomization. The urogynecology clinic nurse will prepare the selected gel
(either the 2% lidocaine gel or the water based lubricant) on the procedure field without
any identification. Since the gels look identical, both the examiner and the patient will be
blinded to their assigned arm. The participant will undergo the standard clinic exam in
standardized order, which consists of perineal/vulvar sensation exam, measurement of post
void residual, cotton tipped swab test, pelvic organ prolapse quantification measurements,
pelvic exam with speculum, bi-manual exam, and multichannel urodynamic testing. The study
gel will be applied to the red robinson catheter for in and out catheterization, the cotton
tipped swab, and the bladder catheter for multichannel urodynamic study. The participant
will be asked for their pain level at specific points (before the start of the exam, after
placement of the bladder catheter, immediately after completion of the study, 30 minutes
after completion of the study) using the Wong-Baker pain scale. At the conclusion of the
procedure, the participant will be given a short survey to complete about their expectations
of the procedure and their pain level. The practitioner/investigator will also be given a
short survey to complete at the end of the examination to assess their idea of the patient's
comfort level during the procedure. Data will be entered into a database for analysis using
the independent samples t test, the Mann-Whitney U test, and the chi square test.
We will specifically be using Lidocaine Hydrochloride Jelly USP, 2% and Surgilube (Savage
Laboratories). Surgilube is a water based lubricating gel used during gynecologic exams. It
is available in 5g individually wrapped sterile packets. Lidocaine gel is also readily
available for use in the gynecologic clinics, available in 5ml individually wrapped sterile
packets. Both are clear, viscous, odorless, gels that are visually identical. Currently both
are used in the standard urogynecologic exam, depending on operator preference.
All patients scheduled for urodynamic testing will be invited to participate.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Female.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Women 18 years of age or older
- Scheduled to undergo multichannel urodynamic study
- Able to give informed consent
- Able to read and write in English or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any contraindication to multichannel urodynamic study
- Allergy to water based lubricant or lidocaine
- Any active pelvic or lower urinary tract infection
Locations and Contacts
LAC USC Womens clinic, Los Angeles, California 90033, United States
Additional Information
Starting date: December 2011
Last updated: January 16, 2015
|