Paclitaxel Compared With Doxorubicin in Treating Patients With Advanced AIDS-Related Kaposi's Sarcoma
Information source: National Cancer Institute (NCI)
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this data on August 20, 2015 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: AIDS-related Kaposi Sarcoma
Intervention: paclitaxel (Drug); pegylated liposomal doxorubicin hydrochloride (Drug); laboratory biomarker analysis (Other); quality-of-life assessment (Procedure)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: National Cancer Institute (NCI) Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Jamie Von Roenn, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group
Summary
Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of paclitaxel with that of
doxorubicin in treating patients who have advanced AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma. Drugs used
in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or
die. It is not yet known whether paclitaxel is more effective than doxorubicin in treating
patients with advanced AIDS-related Kaposi's sarcoma
Clinical Details
Official title: Phase III Study of Paclitaxel Versus Liposomal Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Advanced AIDS-Associated Kaposi's Sarcoma
Study design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Primary outcome: Progression-free survival
Secondary outcome: Patients' health related quality of life (QOL) in terms of change in pain score, edema-related mobility, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and respiratory symptoms based on the total score from the Functional Assessment of HIV Infection (FAHI) v3Overall response rate Complete response rate Toxicities in terms of nausea/vomiting, alopecia, neuropathy and mouth sores, based on the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) v2.0 Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection assessed with respect to cluster of differentiation (CD)4 and CD8 lymphocyte subsets HIV infection assessed with respect to HIV viral load HIV infection assessed with respect to incidence and type of opportunistic infections
Detailed description:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare the effect of therapy with paclitaxel to therapy with liposomal doxorubicin on
progression-free survival and on global assessment of quality of life of subjects with
advanced AIDS-related K. S.
II. To compare the toxicity profile of intravenous paclitaxel with liposomal doxorubicin in
patients with advanced AIDS-related K. S.
III. To compare the overall and complete response rate of intravenous paclitaxel with
liposomal doxorubicin in patients with advanced AIDS-related K. S.
IV. To evaluate the effect of intravenous paclitaxel as compared with therapy with liposomal
doxorubicin on the clinical course of HIV infection in patients with advanced AIDS-related
K. S., by monitoring CD4 and CD8 lymphocyte subsets, HIV viral load and the incidence and
type of opportunistic infections.
V. To explore the relationship between viral load and response to the therapy for patients
with AIDS-related K. S.
VI. To describe the relationship between "technical" response as measured by the current KS
response criteria and the clinical benefit of therapy as measured by the revised KS clinical
benefit criteria.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized study. Patients are randomized to receive either paclitaxel
(arm I) or doxorubicin HCL liposome(arm II).
Arm I: Patients receive paclitaxel over 3 hours by intravenous infusion. Treatment course
repeats every 2 weeks. Patients are evaluated every third course.
Arm II: Patients receive doxorubicin HCL liposome over 30-60 minutes by intravenous
infusion. Treatment course is repeated every 3 weeks. Patients are evaluated before every
odd course.
Patients in both arms continue treatment if there is no disease progression or unacceptable
toxicity. Patients with complete response continue on study treatment for 2 courses beyond
documented complete response.
Quality of life is assessed before, during, and after treatment.
Patients are followed every 3 months for the first 2 years, then every 6 months for years
2-5, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: There will be 240 patients (120 patients in each arm) accrued into this
study over 24 months.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Serologic diagnosis of HIV infection as documented by a positive ELISA and confirmed
with a western blot, other federally approved HIV diagnostic test, or HIV viral load
measurement
- Biopsy-proven, measurable Kaposi's sarcoma with any of the following:
- Progressive cutaneous disease
- Symptomatic oropharyngeal or conjunctival lesions
- Any visceral involvement
- Tumor-related lymphedema
- Tumor-related ulceration or pain
- NOTE: All patients must have measurable disease; baseline measurements must be
obtained < 4 weeks prior to registration
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- ANC >= 1000/mm³ (with or without the use of colony-stimulating factors)
- Platelet count >= 50,000/mm³
- Hemoglobin >= 8 gm/dL
- Bilirubin < 1. 5 x the upper limit of normal (unless elevation is due to Crixivan
administration with isolated elevation in conjugated bilirubin)
- SGOT or SGPT =< 5 x the upper limit of normal
- Creatinine =< 2. 1 mg/dl
- Women must not be pregnant or lactating due to potential toxicity of therapy
- Women of childbearing potential and sexually active men must be advised to use an
accepted and effective method of contraception due to potential toxicity of therapy
- No prior systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy for Kaposi's sarcoma
- Prior radiation therapy must have been discontinued >= 7 days prior to randomization
and must NOT have been delivered to marker lesions; (NOTE: Radiation therapy will not
be permitted during study treatment)
- No active, untreated infection (no new opportunistic infectious complications within
the previous week requiring a change in antibiotics); maintenance therapy for
opportunistic infections will be allowed
- No prior or concomitant malignancy other than curatively treated carcinoma in situ of
the cervix or basal/squamous cell carcinoma of the skin
- No neuropsychiatric history or altered mental status that might prevent informed
consent or affect the ability of the patient to comply with the study
- Institutions must ask patients to participate in the quality of life portion of the
protocol; however, patients may decline participation in this component of the study
and still be eligible; the reason for refusal or inability to complete the QOL
assessments must be documented in the Assessment Compliance Form (#596)
- Must not be known to be sensitive to E. coli derived proteins
- No history of cardiac insufficiency (NY Heart Association status >= 2)
- Patients must be on stable (no change in drugs or doses) antiretroviral therapy for
greater than 14 days prior to study; a combination regimen is required; ideally this
will be a protease inhibitor containing triple therapy regimen
- Patients must give signed, written informed consent
Locations and Contacts
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
Additional Information
Starting date: March 1999
Last updated: January 9, 2013
|