A Comparison of Two Total Hip Replacements: Hip Resurfacing System Versus Mallory-Head/Exeter
Information source: University of Aarhus
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Osteoarthrosis
Intervention: ReCap, Hip resurfacing system, Biomet (Device)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Active, not recruiting
Sponsored by: University of Aarhus Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Kjeld Søballe, MD., Prof., Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two total hip replacement systems: Hip Resurfacing
System (ReCap) versus Mallory-Head/Exeter.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Comparison of Two Total Hip Replacements: Hip Resurfacing System Versus Mallory-Head/Exeter
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Metal ion release evaluated in urineGait pattern evaluated with 3D gait analysis, Vicon Polygon Bone mineral density (BMD) in surrounding bone of the prosthesis Prostheses migration evaluated by radiostereometric analysis (RSA) Proinflammatory- and bone degradation measures in blood samples
Detailed description:
In Denmark approximately 7000 primary hip replacements are implanted yearly, and the
incidence is rising with the increasingly aging population. For older patients, the incidence
of later revisions of hip implantation is low. Unfortunately, this is not true for younger
patients. Approximately 20% of patients under 55 years of age at the time of surgery must
have the hip implant renewed within 10 years.
This is primarily because of the wear generated by polyethylene debris. The polyethylene is
associated with osteolysis in the proximity of the prosthesis leading to failure of the
prosthesis.
This unsatisfactory result has led to the development of an alternative hip prosthesis
especially to benefit younger and physically active people. The new prosthesis should produce
less inflammatory debris and less osteolysis induced failure.
To avoid the polyethylene particles, a new type of prosthesis has been made articulating
metal on metal. The Hip Resurfacing System consists of an alloy of chrome - cobalt -
molybdenum. Another point of interest for this prosthesis is also the size of the
articulating surfaces which are bigger than usual. This will theoretically participate in the
generation of metal ions.
Study objectives:
- This randomised prospective study will investigate the emission of Co-, Cr- and Mb-ions
from Hip Resurfacing System and Mallory-Head/Exeter implants, respectively. The emission
is measured as the ion concentration in the urine and is correlated to the inflammatory
response in fasting plasma before and after the operation.
- To assess the walking pattern postoperatively using a 3D gait analysis, Vicon Polygon.
- To assess the postoperative recovery using the Harris hip score and visual analogue
scale.
- The migration of acetabular components will be evaluated by RSA, performing
radiostereometric analyses at the Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital. The
follow-up RSA will be scheduled for week 1, as well as 3 months, 12 months, 24 months,
and 5 years after surgery. Bone mineral density around the implanted femoral component
will be examined by DEXA scan at week 1, as well as 1 year and 2 years after surgery.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 50 Years.
Maximum age: 65 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient with primary hip osteoarthrosis (OA).
- Informed patient consent in writing.
- Sufficient bone density to allow uncemented implantation of an acetabular component.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of other metal implants.
- Working exposure of chrome, cobalt or molybdenum.
- Ingestion of multivitamin or medication containing chrome, cobalt or molybdenum.
- Kidney disease
- Hip joint dysplasia
- Patients with neuromuscular or vascular disease in the affected leg.
- Patients who regularly take non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and cannot
interrupt intake for the postoperative phase of the study.
- Patients with fracture sequelae.
- Female patients of childbearing capacity.
- Sequelae to previous hip joint disorder in childhood
Locations and Contacts
Orthopaedic Center, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Jylland 8000, Denmark
Additional Information
Starting date: January 2005
Ending date: January 2008
Last updated: October 18, 2007
|