Do Laryngeal Tissue Changes in Patients Suspected of Having Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Predict Response to Treatment?
Information source: Vanderbilt University
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on February 12, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Larynx Disease; Gastroesophageal Reflux
Intervention: Lansoprazole Tablet (Drug); Esophageal and Laryngeal Biopsies (Procedure)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Vanderbilt University Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Michael F Vaezi, MD PhD MS, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Vanderbilt University
Overall contact: barbara mccafferty, RN, Phone: 615-322-1897, Email: barbara.mccafferty@vanderbilt.edu
Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if tissue changes are predictor of clinical response
to therapy.
The hypothesis is that the patients who have laryngeal signs and symptoms related to acid
reflux, will have ultrastructural changes on a laryngeal biopsy which are predictors of
response to therapy.
Clinical Details
Official title: Do Laryngeal Biopsy Findings Predict Treatment Response in Suspected Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
Study design: Treatment, Non-Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Single Group Assignment
Primary outcome: Dilation of intracellular spaces 3 months after therapy
Detailed description:
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been implicated, in part, as the cause of various
laryngeal signs and symptoms (1-7). This is often termed reflux laryngitis, ear, nose, and
throat (ENT) reflux, or laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). GERD was first described to be a
causative agent in developing contact ulcers of the larynx (8), and since this early report
other routinely observed laryngeal signs are now attributed to LPR. These include laryngeal
edema/erythema, vocal cord granulomas and polyps, posterior cricoid cobblestoning,
interarytenoid changes, and subglottic stenosis. In addition, patient symptoms attributed to
LPR include hoarseness, sore or burning throat, chronic cough, throat clearing, globus,
nocturnal laryngospasm, otalgia, post-nasal drip, and dysphagia.
GERD occurs in 7% - 25% of the population on a daily or monthly basis, respectively (9). It
is estimated that up to 10% of patients presenting to ENT physicians do so because of
complaints that are thought to be related to LPR (2).
The current management of patients with suspected LPR complaints include either 1. empiric
therapy using proton pump inhibitors (PPI's) or 2. Ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring to test
for GERD before beginning treatment. Because of the uncertainty and subjectivity of the ENT
laryngeal examination in diagnosing LPR, both algorithms fall short of ideal in treating
these patients. In a recent review of the literature, remarkably, up to 50% of patients with
laryngoscopic signs suggesting LPR do not respond to aggressive acid suppression and do not
have abnormal esophageal acid reflux values on pH testing (10). Yet, in this subset of
patients LPR continues to be implicated as the probable etiology of the patient's laryngeal
signs and symptoms.
Calabrese, et al. recently looked at the reversibility of GERD related ultrastructural
alterations in the esophagus using a PPI. Lower esophageal biopsies were analyzed with
electron microscopy (EM) for ultrastructural alterations attributed to GERD; that is,
dilation of intracellular spaces. Patients were then treated with a PPI and re-biopsied for
analysis of any changes of healing that may have occurred in these ultrastructural
alterations. Not surprisingly, the ultrastructural alterations showed complete recovery
(reduction of dilated intracellular spaces) after treatment with a PPI. Additionally
resolution of patient's symptoms coincided with recovery of ultrastructural alterations (11).
No such biopsies looking for LPR related changes in the larynx have ever been performed in
human subjects. Our initial study which is also submitted for review will provide data on the
prevalence of biopsy findings in controls, GERD and LPR patients. Subsequent to this
prevalence study, the importance of these findings will be assessed based to determine if
these findings will predict response to acid suppressive therapy.
In sum, LPR is an extremely subjective diagnosis, in which nearly half of all patients do not
have an abnormal 24hr pH study, nor do they respond to the standard GERD therapy of acid
suppression. Finding an alternative objective criterion for GERD induced laryngitis would be
an important clinical discovery. To date, there are no data on microscopic changes in the
larynx of patients suspected of having LPR. The most important question which this protocol
will address is if laryngeal findings specifically by either routine microscopy or electron
microscopy would predict response to PPI therapy. This would then result in being able to
identify GERD related laryngitis from non-GERD related causes.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
GERD
- Documented erosive esophagitis:
- Patients will be newly diagnosed with esophageal erosion at initial visit via
EGD
- Patients with non-erosive esophagitis who have been responsive to PPI
LPR
- Diagnosed via Head & Neck Institute endoscopists:
- pts with chronic (> 3-months) history of hoarseness, throat clearing, sore- or
burning throat and globus
- Documentation of LPR using Larynx/Pharynx exam.
This group is commonly evaluated at the Vanderbilt Voice Center.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18yrs
- Pregnancy
- Patients with contra-indications for EGD
- Patients on corticosteroids
- Active smokers
- Patients with a history of regular (> 2 /day) alcohol use.
- Use of antacid (PPI, H2RB) within last 30 days
- Use of any/all medications affecting gastrointestinal motility
- Known history of: Barrett's esophagus, Peptic stricture, Pyloric stenosis, Gastric
resection
- Patients unable to give informed consent
- Patients unable to comply with follow-up
- Patients with known contraindication to lansoprazole.
- Contraindications to biopsy: Taking anticoagulants other than aspirin (Coumadin,
Plavix) or allergic to the local anesthetics.
Locations and Contacts
barbara mccafferty, RN, Phone: 615-322-1897, Email: barbara.mccafferty@vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Endoscopy Lab, TVC 1410, Nashville, Tennessee 37232-5280, United States; Recruiting barbara mccafferty, RN, Phone: 615-322-1897, Email: barbara.mccafferty@vanderbilt.edu Michael F Vaezi, MD PhD MS, Principal Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: March 2007
Ending date: January 2009
Last updated: August 8, 2008
|