A Randomized Controlled Trial on Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children With Vesico-Ureteral Reflux
Information source: IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Pyelonephritis; Renal Scars
Intervention: sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim or nitrofurantoin prophylaxis (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Marco Pennesi, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
Summary
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing
pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36
months with vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR).
Clinical Details
Official title: Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Acute Pyelonephritis for Prevention of Urinary Tract Infections in Children With Vesico-Ureteral Reflux.
Study design: Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Recurrence of pyelonephritisRenal scars
Secondary outcome: Persistence of vesico-ureteral reflux
Detailed description:
In recent years, the effectiveness of continuous antibiotic prophylaxis in children with
vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) has been intensely discussed. The question is not only whether
antibiotics are effective in preventing recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI), but also
whether they alter the natural history of disease and help to prevent the appearance of new
kidneys scars. The evidence on the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis is scanty:
randomised controlled trials (RCT) published until now are poorly designed and carried out in
very heterogeneous samples of children, i. e. spanning from 6 months to 14-18 years of age and
pooling patients with and without VUR. A recently updated Cochrane Systematic Review
concludes that high quality RCTs are needed to determine the effectiveness of long-term
antibiotics for the prevention of UTIs in susceptible children. Moreover, the presence of VUR
has not been firmly shown to be a risk factor for recurrence of pyelonephritis, and a direct
association between VUR and the presence of scars or the appearance of new scars has not been
demonstrated; there is just an association between VUR of grade IV-V and prenatal renal
dysplasia, almost exclusively in male infants. In spite of this uncertainty, several practice
guidelines recommend long term antibiotic prophylaxis in children with different degrees of
VUR.
The aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing
pyelonephritis and in avoiding the appearance of new scars in a sample of children under 36
months with VUR.
Comparison: In a multicentre trial, 100 patients with VUR diagnosed with cystourethrography
after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis or for prenatal evidence of pyelectasia will be
assigned randomly to receive prophylaxis or not. Randomization will be carried out using a
centralized minimization procedure to balance for sex, age group and VUR grade.
Eligibility
Minimum age: N/A.
Maximum age: 30 Months.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- presence of vesico-ureteral reflux (VUR) grade II, III or IV, based on the
International Classification, mono or bilateral, diagnosed between one day and 30
months of age after a first episode of acute pyelonephritis, or after birth during
diagnostic procedures planned as a consequence of prenatal ultrasonographic evidence
of pyelectasia.
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous episodes of urinary tract infection (UTI), even if only suspected (e. g. an
episode of fever treated with antibiotics without performing urine culture);
- VUR grade I, because of the high probability of rapid spontaneous resolution;
- VUR grade V, as requested by the Technical Scientific Committee, concerned by the high
incidence of associated renal dysplasia;
- recurrence of acute pyelonephritis before the first dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA)
renal scan, if this was positive for scars.
Locations and Contacts
Sant'Orsola Hospital, Bologna 48138, Italy
Bufalini Hospital, Cesena 47023, Italy
Santa Maria degli Angeli Hospital, Pordenone 33170, Italy
Institute of Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste 34137, Italy
San Polo Hospital, Monfalcone, Gorizia 34170, Italy
Sant'Antonio Abate Hospital, Tolmezzo, Udine 33028, Italy
San Daniele Hospital, San Daniele, Udine 33100, Italy
Additional Information
Starting date: November 1999
Ending date: May 2006
Last updated: September 28, 2006
|