Nexium Study To Suppress Nausea During Chemotherapy
Information source: Baylor Breast Care Center
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on February 12, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Nausea
Intervention: esomeprazole (Drug)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Baylor Breast Care Center Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Mothaffar Rimawi, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Baylor Breast Center
Overall contact: Claudette Foreman, Phone: 713-798-7315, Email: caforeman@breastcenter.tmc.edu
Summary
This study will look at a drug called esomeprazole, the newest PPI, as a way to further
reduce the amount of nausea and vomiting seen in breast cancer patients receiving adriamycin
or epirubicin chemotherapy. Esomeprazole may help protect the gut lining from the stomach
acid and thus lessen the nausea and vomiting. If patients have less stomach sickness, they
may be able to enjoy their daily routines much more while they are getting chemotherapy.
Clinical Details
Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy of Esomeprazole in Suppressing Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: The purpose of this study is to determine whether esomeprazole significantly decreases the incidence, severity and duration of nausea/vomiting/retching in breast cancer patients who are receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Secondary outcome: Safety of esomeprazole when used to decrease the incidence,severity and duration of nausea/vomiting/retching in breast cancer patients who are receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
Detailed description:
1. Breast Cancer
The American Cancer Society estimates that there will be approximately 215,990 new cases
of breast cancer diagnosed in women during 2004 in the United States. Breast cancer is
the most common malignancy in women in the United States and the second leading cause of
cancer death in women.
Treatment options for breast cancer have evolved from extensive surgical approaches to
breast-conserving techniques and the use of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant chemotherapy,
radiation, and endocrine therapy to reduce the risk of recurrence.
2. Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer
The use of adjuvant chemotherapy is a well established and routine part of care for
breast cancer. Chemotherapy can reduce a woman's risk of recurrence by 25-30%. The
amount of risk reduction depends on the patient's age, nodal status, and hormone
receptor status.
Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is standard in the treatment of breast cancer with
doxorubicin being the most frequently used agent in this group. Currently the most
commonly used chemotherapy regimens for breast cancer include: *
doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (AC) * fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (FAC) *
cyclophosphamide/methotrexate/fluorouracil (CMF) *
docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) * fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide
(FEC) * single agent taxanes (paclitaxel and docetaxel) Except for the taxanes, these
agents are known to cause significant nausea and vomiting after administration.
Cancer drugs differ both quantitatively and qualitatively in their emetogenic potential.
Emetogenic potential can be influenced by chemotherapy-related characteristics and
patient characteristics.
3. Gastrointestinal Side Effects of Chemotherapy
Nausea and vomiting following administration of chemotherapy for cancer are among the most
significant and feared side effects of patients undergoing treatment. Despite continued
advances in pharmacology, the ability to prevent or control nausea, vomiting, or retching
remains a problem for patients. Research has confirmed that chemotherapy related nausea and
vomiting negatively affects quality of life. Among patients, the same level of nausea and
vomiting varies in effect on quality of life. It is difficult to substantiate the degree of
this effect, but it has been shown that even with serotonin antagonists, patients still rank
nausea as their most bothersome chemotherapy side effect, while vomiting is ranked as third
to fifth most bothersome.
The risk for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting is related to the anti-neoplastic
agents administered and to patient related factors. Emetogenic potential is affected by the
intrinsic emetogenicity of the chemotherapy drugs, the combination of agents, the doses
administered and the rate of administration. Patient related factors include: 1.
gender-increased risk in females 2. age-increased risk in younger, premenopausal patients 3.
history of alcohol intake-low chronic intake decreases risk 4. history of motion
sickness-increases risk 5. hyperemesis during pregnancy-increases risk.
Emesis is a complex phenomenon characterized by three components: nausea, vomiting, and
retching. Nausea is a subjective phenomenon of an unpleasant sensation in the epigastrium and
in the back of the throat that may or may not culminate in vomiting; it is also described as
feeling "sick at the stomach." Nausea exists only insofar as it is defined by the patient.
Vomiting is the forceful expulsion of the contents of the stomach, duodenum and jejunum
through the oral cavity as a result of changes in intrathoracic positive pressure. It is also
described as "throwing up." Retching, also called "dry heaves," is the attempt to vomit
without expelling any material.
Drugs used to improve the control of nausea and vomiting include serotonin antagonists,
dopamine antagonist (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine), corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, and
phenothiazines. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has developed clinical
practice guidelines for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting based on
the emetogenic potential of the agents being administered. For combinations with moderate
emetogenic potential, acute emesis is managed with a corticosteroid and serotonin receptor
antagonists. Serotonin receptor antagonists currently available include ondansetron,
granisetron, and dolasetron. Studies indicate they are equally effective in the management of
chemotherapy-related nausea/vomiting/retching. Delayed emesis (greater than 24 hours
post-chemotherapy) can be controlled with a number of agents including steroids, serotonin
receptor antagonists or metoclopramide. Recommended combinations include dexamethasone, 8 mg
for 2-3 days, then 4 mg for 1-2 days and metoclopramide, 20-40 mg twice daily to four times
daily for 3-4 days, or Zofran 8 mg twice daily for 3 days. With combination chemotherapy,
patients should receive the antiemetic regimens appropriate for the chemotherapy agent with
the highest emetic risk.
Drugs used to improve the control of nausea and vomiting include serotonin antagonists,
dopamine antagonist (metoclopramide, prochlorperazine), corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, and
phenothiazines. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has developed clinical
practice guidelines for the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting based on
the emetogenic potential of the agents being administered. For combinations with moderate
emetogenic potential, acute emesis is managed with a corticosteroid and serotonin receptor
antagonists. Serotonin receptor antagonists currently available include ondansetron,
granisetron, and dolasetron. Studies indicate they are equally effective in the management of
chemotherapy-related nausea/vomiting/retching. Delayed emesis (greater than 24 hours
post-chemotherapy) can be controlled with a number of agents including steroids, serotonin
receptor antagonists or metoclopramide. Recommended combinations include dexamethasone, 8 mg
for 2-3 days, then 4 mg for 1-2 days and metoclopramide, 20-40 mg twice daily to four times
daily for 3-4 days, or Zofran 8 mg twice daily for 3 days. With combination chemotherapy,
patients should receive the antiemetic regimens appropriate for the chemotherapy agent with
the highest emetic risk.
Studies done with standard antiemetics in women undergoing treatment with anthracycline-based
chemotherapy for breast cancer show a success rate for emetic control in the range of 60-65%.
4. Measurement of Nausea, Vomiting, and Retching
It remains difficult to compare clinical studies of nausea and vomiting because of the
variety of measurement tools utilized and the variable time periods that were monitored
following chemotherapy. The ideal tool would include assessment of: 1. duration and severity
of nausea 2. frequency, duration, and severity of vomiting/retching 3. number of antiemetics
utilized 4. impact of nausea and vomiting on quality of life 5. adverse effects experienced
5. Proton Pump Inhibitors
Despite utilization of the antiemetics recommended by ASCO, approximately one-third of
patients undergoing anthracycline-based chemotherapy still develop nausea and vomiting. A
current therapeutic challenge is to find and prove methods to control nausea and vomiting
after chemotherapy.
Although the pathophysiology of nausea and vomiting is not well understood, we know that
chemotherapy causes damage to the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. The pathobiology of the
mucosal damage has been reviewed by Blijlevens and can be divided into four phases: the
inflammatory phase, the epithelial phase, the ulcerative/bacteriological phase and the
healing phase. This mucosal injury is usually self-limiting with a complete cycle of injury
to healing lasting approximately 2-3 weeks. The mucosal damage can be increased in patients
receiving chemotherapy and corticosteroids which breast cancer patients require as
pre-medications. Since cytotoxic chemotherapy damages the mucosal lining, it leaves the GI
mucosa exposed to the normal acid-producing gastric parietal cells. The resultant damage has
been seen endoscopically in patients receiving chemotherapy with cytosine arabinoside. Hence,
suppression of acid secretion from the gastric parietal cells should reduce mucosal injury
and related symptoms.
Historical therapies for gastrointestinal distress have included anticholinergics, as well as
H-2 receptor antagonists, to help reduce acid secretion. H-2 receptor blockers were effective
by blocking the histamine driven acid secretion, but despite its targeted action, acid
production continues through alternative pathways. Recently a group of new agents known as
proton pump inhibitors have been developed which target the final common pathway of acid
secretion. These agents are known to act directly on the H+/K+-ATPase in the gastric parietal
cell. Since these agents act directly on the final stimulatory pathway, they provide rapid
symptom resolution and reliable healing in gastroesophageal reflux disease and peptic ulcer
disease.
To date, two large clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of
proton pump inhibitors in preventing mucosal injury. The first trial selected 182 patients
with breast cancer (77 pts) or colon cancer (105 pts) who were receiving cyclophosphamide,
methotrexate and 5-FU (CMF), or 5-FU, respectively. These patients were randomized to receive
either omeprazole (20 mg daily), misoprostol (a prostaglandin analogue) (400 mg twice daily),
or placebo (once daily) for two full courses of chemotherapy (56 days). Endoscopic evaluation
(EGD) was performed one week prior to initiation of chemotherapy and one week after the end
of the second cycle of chemotherapy comparing the number of erosions/ulcers in the stomach
and duodenum. The omeprazole group had a lower frequency and degree of erosions compared to
placebo and misoprostol. Symptoms of epigastric pain and heartburn were also significantly
less in the omeprazole patients. A second study performed by the same group evaluated
patients with breast or colon cancer (n=228) receiving either CMF or 5-FU. These patients
were randomized to receive omeprazole 20 mg daily, ranitidine 300 mg daily (a H2 blocker), or
placebo once daily for 56 days. EGD was performed as above, before cycle 1 and after cycle 2
of chemotherapy. The omeprazole group experienced the lowest frequency of ulcers (n=2),
followed by the ranitidine group (n=8), and the placebo group (n=18). Symptoms of epigastric
pain or heartburn were also significantly less in the omeprazole arm (n=11) compared to the
ranitidine (n=13) or placebo (n=24) arms. Chemotherapy was delayed in the placebo and
ranitidine group, but not in the patients receiving omeprazole. These two trials demonstrate
the ability of a proton pump inhibitor (omeprazole) to limit the mucosal injury induced by
chemotherapy. Protecting the mucosa from damage also appeared to significantly decrease the
frequency of upper GI symptoms. It should be noted that nausea or vomiting was not assessed
in either trial since various antiemetics were given during chemotherapy.
Esomeprazole magnesium is the latest proton pump inhibitor that has been developed. It is
unique in that it is the S- isomer of omeprazole, and as such, has better bioavailability and
elevated levels compared to the racemic omeprazole. Since the proton pump is the last step in
acid production, blockade of this pump causes reduction in gastric acidity. This effect is
dose related up to a dose of 20-40mg daily. Esomeprazole is currently clinically indicated
for the treatment of erosive esophagitis and symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease. In
addition, it is approved to treat Helicobacter pylori in patients with duodenal ulcer disease
in conjunction with either amoxicillin or clarithromycin and amoxicillin.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Female.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
For inclusion, participants must:
- be female, age 18 years or older
- sign an informed consent
- have Stage I, II, or III breast cancer
- be receiving at least four cycles of anthracycline-based chemotherapy which may
include: doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide AC),5-fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide
(FAC), fluoruracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) or dose dense chemotherapy
regimen (AC every two weeks) as their agents for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy
- patient must receive a serotonin receptor antagonist and a steroid for premedication
- have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days prior to starting study if
pre-menopausal
- have adequate renal function, defined by a serum creatinine within 1. 5 times the upper
limit of normal
- have adequate liver function, defined by a total bilirubin, SGOT, alkaline phosphatase
and albumin within 1. 5 times the upper limits of normal
- have adequate bone marrow function, defined as a WBC >4. 0, platelet count >100K, and
HCT >30
- have no prior or current malignancies for which chemotherapy was utilized
- have a performance status of at least 2 according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology
Group World Health Organization or a Karnofsky score of 50% or greater.
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnancy or unwillingness to use a reliable contraceptive method in women of
child-bearing potential
- severe or underlying chronic illness or disease
- renal insufficiency or liver abnormalities
- chronic use of steroids
- uncontrolled GERD
- current use of proton pump inhibitors
- history of Barrett's esophagus
- history of erosive gastritis
- intolerance to serotonin receptor antagonists
- current use of aprepitant or palonosetron as antiemetics
- concomitant use of H2-receptor antagonists (ranitidine, cimetidine, famotidine or
nizatidine) or metaclopramide
Locations and Contacts
Claudette Foreman, Phone: 713-798-7315, Email: caforeman@breastcenter.tmc.edu
Baylor Breast Center, Houston, Texas 77030, United States; Recruiting Claudette Foreman, CRC, Phone: 713-798-7315, Email: caforma@breastcenter.tmc.edu Tawana Castile, CRC, Phone: 713-798-1999, Email: tcastile@breastcenter.tmc.edu GARRETT R Lynch, MD, Sub-Investigator Powel H Brown, MD, Sub-Investigator C Kent Osborne, MD, Sub-Investigator Jenny Chang, MD, Sub-Investigator Mary Rude, RN, Sub-Investigator
Additional Information
Web site
Starting date: August 2005
Ending date: September 2010
Last updated: January 5, 2009
|