Gabapentin for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Information source: Chinese University of Hong Kong
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Intervention: Gabapentin (Drug); placebo (Other)
Phase: Phase 3
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Chinese University of Hong Kong Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Andrew CF Hui, FHKAM, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Department of Medicine & Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether gabapentin is safe and effective in the
treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).
Clinical Details
Official title: Gabapentin for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Safety/Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Global symptom score (GSS) recorded by a physician blinded to the allocation of treatment at 8 weeks
Secondary outcome: GSS at 2 weeksGrip strength as functional assessment at 2 and 8 weeks Tolerability
Detailed description:
A variety of treatment options exist at present for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) with no
universal agreement. Recent reports suggested that untreated CTS might improve or remain
stationary. In this respect, treatment directing towards symptom suppression alone may have a
role in the initial management of CTS. Gabapentin (1-[aminomethyl]-cyclohexaneacetic acid;
Neurontin, Pfizer) is an effective drug for treatment of neuropathic pain and has been
reported to be effective in case series for the treatment of CTS with relatively benign side
effects profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of
gabapentin in the treatment of CTS.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sensory symptoms over median nerve distribution for more than three months.
- Confirmatory electrophysiologic results defined as prolonged median nerve distal motor
latencies (DML) > 4 ms or median-ulnar palmer sensory latency differences > 0. 5 ms.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with evidence of severe CTS: fibrillation potentials or reinnervation on
needle examination of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle or clinical examination
showing wastage of the thenar muscles. (These patients were referred for surgical
decompression on presentation.)
- Clinical or electrophysiological evidence of accompanying conditions that could mimic
CTS or interfere with its evaluation, such as proximal median neuropathy, cervical
radiculopathy, or significant polyneuropathy.
- Known epilepsy.
- Patients who have received previous steroid injection or oral steroid therapy for
CTS.
Locations and Contacts
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong
North District Hospital, Sheung Shui, New Territories, Hong Kong
Additional Information
Starting date: October 2003
Ending date: December 2006
Last updated: October 30, 2007
|