Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma II
Information source: University of California, San Francisco
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on March 24, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Trachoma; Chlamydia Trachomatis
Intervention: Azithromycin (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Active, not recruiting
Sponsored by: University of California, San Francisco Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Julius Schachter, PhD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of California, San Francisco Chandler R Dawson, MD, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of California, San Francisco
Summary
Trachoma is the world's leading cause of preventable blindness. This disease, caused by
Chlamydia trachomatis, is endemic in many parts of the developing world. In 1990s we
evaluated the use of community-wide treatment with oral azithromycin in a project called
Azithromycin in Control of Trachoma (ACT). This approach resulted in clinical improvement and
dramatic reduction in prevalence of chlamydial infection through a 1-year follow-up. We
enrolled the ACT villages, as well as an additional village that had not had any prior
treatments, in our ACT II (2005) study and performed clinical surveys to assess trachoma
activity testing conjunctival swabs for the presence of C. trachomatis by nucleic acid
amplification tests (NAATs). Thus, we hoped to determine the long-term (10 year) effects of
azithromycin treatment.
We have completed the census and clinical survey of the initial three villages. Mass
treatment with azithromycin would not be justified with such low rates (1. 8 - 4%) of ocular
chlamydial infection. We have treated only those living in households with one or more cases
of chlamydial infection and we will not follow up on these individually treated families.
In order to achieve the goals of our study, we now propose to identify other more remote
villages with trachoma infection rates of 20% or more to evaluate the effect of
community-wide treatment with single dose of oral azithromycin. If one or more of these
villages (dependent upon population) has trachoma rates of 20% or more they will be invited
to participate in the azithromycin treatment. In one set of subjects (1 or 2 villages,
dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform treatment, and follow them up
at 2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. In a second set of
subjects (1 or 2 villages, dependent upon population and infection rate) we will perform
treatment, then perform re-treatment at 30-days post initial treatment, and follow them up at
2-, 12-, and 24-months post-treatment to ascertain infection rates. This should help us
determine the need for/and the best time for re-treatment to eliminate blinding trachoma, as
some recent studies suggest there is a 2-4% failure rate in the initial treatment. In sum,
this study should provide a rational approach to use of community-wide azithromycin treatment
to eliminate blinding trachoma as a public health problem
Clinical Details
Study design: Treatment, Non-Randomized, Single Blind (Investigator), Active Control, Single Group Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis diagnosed by use of NAAT
Secondary outcome: Clinical trachoma
Detailed description:
This is operational research aimed at better defining the use of oral azithromycin as part of
the SAFE strategy to eliminate blinding trachoma.
1. Before the examinations, we will do a census and a sketch map of houses in each village.
Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying all the children between 1 and 6 years
of age. These children are the chief reservoir of infection, and would have been too
young (or unborn) at the ACT study treatment, so it is of particular interest to
determine their disease and infection status.
2. Egyptian ophthalmologists will examine the eyelids, conjunctiva and cornea using
magnifying loupes and a hand held light, with grading following the ACT protocol which
contains categories referable to the W. H.O. detailed grading scheme. The clinical
findings will be recorded on a standardized form.
3. Egyptian health aides will photograph the inside of the right upper eyelid of all
subjects. The photographs of the subjects at the initial visit and all subsequent
examinations will be examined to confirm the consistency of clinical findings over the
period of the study.
4. To test for chlamydial infection, a single fiber-tipped swab will be stroked gently over
the conjunctiva of the right eye by an Egyptian ophthalmologist. These swabs will be
placed in special tubes and tested for Chlamydia trachomatis by a nucleic acid
amplification assay. [APTIMA® Gen-Probe Inc. (San Diego, CA.)] The APTIMA® assay
detects DNA via r-RNA by a process called transcription mediated amplification.
Laboratory testing will be performed at the Chlamydia Research Laboratory at University
of California, San Francisco.
5. After the results are obtained from the nucleic acid amplification testing performed at
the laboratory in San Francisco, treatment for trachoma will be done with a single-dose
of oral azithromycin (20 mg/kg body weight in children, 1. 0 gm adults). The azithromycin
will be donated by Pfizer International. Young children will be weighed to determine the
dose of azithromycin and the doses administered by a health aide under direct
supervision of an Egyptian physician (Dr. Mahfouz). One set of subjects (1 or 2
villages depending upon population size, in order to generate meaningful numbers) will
receive an initial treatment of 1. 0 gm azithromycin; while the second set of subjects
will receive an initial treatment of 1. 0 gm azithromycin, followed by a second dose of
1. 0 gm azithromycin at 30 days post treatment.
1. If the prevalence of clinical trachoma is over 20% in children 10 and under,
everyone in the village will be treated with oral azithromycin.
After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen
collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and
chlamydial infection.
2. If the prevalence is 10% to 20%, all children 10 and under, and the families of
those children with active trachoma, will be treated.
After initial azithromycin treatment, follow-up examinations and specimen
collection will be done 2, 12, and 24 months post-treatment for trachoma and
chlamydial infection.
3. If the prevalence is less than 10%, only children with active disease and their
families will receive treatment. There will be no follow-up examinations.
Adults and older children will be told that azithromycin can cause nausea, vomiting, or
loose stools or vomiting in some children and adults, and can occur in up to 5% (1
person in 20) of those treated.
It should be noted that in our previous ACT study, more than 8,000 people received
azithromycin with no complaints beyond minor gastro-intestinal upset.
6. All positive specimens will have the major outer membrane gene amplified and sequenced.
The genovars will be mapped for location within villages and families and then their
distribution will be followed over time, after treatment to provide a better
understanding of the epidemiology of the infection. Results of the study will be used as
data input for the generation of mathematical models to predict whether community-wide
retreatment (or alternate strategies) will be needed, and the optimal timing for such
retreatment.
Eligibility
Minimum age: N/A.
Maximum age: N/A.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- This is a clinical trial, which will involve treatment of individuals in trachoma
endemic settings. The entire populations of three villages may be treated. This will
include pregnant women and children >1 year old. Members of minority groups (e. g.
Egyptians belonging to the Coptic faith) who live in the study villages will be
treated in the same manner as other villagers. We will use standard treatment with
oral azithromycin, as recommended by the World Health Organization following results
of initial village-wide surveys. The WHO guidelines call for community-wide treatment
for this disease in hyperendemic areas. Azithromycin is an antibiotic, which is
approved in the United States for use down to 3 months of age. A single-dose has been
accepted by the FDA and CDC as a treatment of choice for genital C. trachomatis
infection. Azithromycin has also been approved for use in Egypt by the Ministry of
Health, but there are no efforts to use it for trachoma control in rural areas.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Person does not live in one of the three rural villages being studied.
Locations and Contacts
University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, United States
Additional Information
Related publications: Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001860. Review. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD001860. Burton MJ, Frick KD, Bailey RL, Bowman RJ. Azithromycin for the treatment and control of trachoma. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2002 Feb;3(2):113-20. Review. Dawson CR, Schachter J. Should trachoma be treated with antibiotics? Lancet. 2002 Jan 19;359(9302):184-5. No abstract available. Bain DL, Lietman T, Rasmussen S, Kalman S, Fan J, Lammel C, Zhang JZ, Dawson CR, Schachter J, Stephens RS. Chlamydial genovar distribution after community wide antibiotic treatment. J Infect Dis. 2001 Dec 15;184(12):1581-8. Epub 2001 Dec 3. Pechere JC. New perspectives on macrolide antibiotics. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2001;18 Suppl 1:S93-7. Review. Fraser-Hurt N, Bailey RL, Cousens S, Mabey D, Faal H, Mabey DC. Efficacy of oral azithromycin versus topical tetracycline in mass treatment of endemic trachoma. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(7):632-40. Tabbara KF. Trachoma: a review. J Chemother. 2001 Apr;13 Suppl 1:18-22. Review. Treadway G. Azithromycin: a new 15-membered macrolide. Jpn J Antibiot. 2001 Feb;54 Suppl A:70-6. Review. Bailey R, Lietman T. The SAFE strategy for the elimination of trachoma by 2020: will it work? Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):233-6. Epub 2003 Jul 7. Review. Frick KD, Lietman TM, Holm SO, Jha HC, Chaudhary JS, Bhatta RC. Cost-effectiveness of trachoma control measures: comparing targeted household treatment and mass treatment of children. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):201-7. Epub 2003 Jul 7. Holm SO, Jha HC, Bhatta RC, Chaudhary JS, Thapa BB, Davis D, Pokhrel RP, Yinghui M, Zegans M, Schachter J, Frick KD, Tapert L, Lietman TM. Comparison of two azithromycin distribution strategies for controlling trachoma in Nepal. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(3):194-200. Epub 2003 Jul 7. Lietman T, Fry A. Can we eliminate trachoma? Br J Ophthalmol. 2001 Apr;85(4):385-7. No abstract available. Duran JM, Amsden GW. Azithromycin: indications for the future? Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2000 Mar;1(3):489-505. Review. Solomon AW, Akudibillah J, Abugri P, Hagan M, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Pilot study of the use of community volunteers to distribute azithromycin for trachoma control in Ghana. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(1):8-14. Epub 2003 Nov 5. West S. The red eye. N Engl J Med. 2000 Nov 23;343(21):1577. No abstract available. Bowman RJ, Sillah A, Van Dehn C, Goode VM, Muquit M, Johnson GJ, Milligan P, Rowley J, Faal H, Bailey RL. Operational comparison of single-dose azithromycin and topical tetracycline for trachoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000 Dec;41(13):4074-9. Guzey M, Aslan G, Ozardali I, Basar E, Satici A, Karadede S. Three-day course of oral azithromycin vs topical oxytetracycline/polymyxin in treatment of active endemic trachoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2000 Jul-Aug;44(4):387-91. Laming AC, Currie BJ, DiFrancesco M, Taylor HR, Mathews JD. A targeted, single-dose azithromycin strategy for trachoma. Med J Aust. 2000 Feb 21;172(4):163-6. Chern KC, Shrestha SK, Cevallos V, Dhami HL, Tiwari P, Chern L, Whitcher JP, Lietman TM. Alterations in the conjunctival bacterial flora following a single dose of azithromycin in a trachoma endemic area. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Dec;83(12):1332-5. Whitty CJ, Glasgow KW, Sadiq ST, Mabey DC, Bailey R. Impact of community-based mass treatment for trachoma with oral azithromycin on general morbidity in Gambian children. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999 Nov;18(11):955-8. Mabey D, Bailey R. Eradication of trachoma worldwide. Br J Ophthalmol. 1999 Nov;83(11):1261-3. Review. No abstract available. Dawson CR. Acceptance of Medaille d'Or du Trachome by Dr. Chandler R. Dawson M. D. Kyoto, 16 May 1978. Rev Int Trach Pathol Ocul Trop Subtrop. 1978;55(3-4):21-2, 30-1. English, French. No abstract available. Schachter J, West SK, Mabey D, Dawson CR, Bobo L, Bailey R, Vitale S, Quinn TC, Sheta A, Sallam S, Mkocha H, Mabey D, Faal H. Azithromycin in control of trachoma. Lancet. 1999 Aug 21;354(9179):630-5. Chidambaram JD, Alemayehu W, Melese M, Lakew T, Yi E, House J, Cevallos V, Zhou Z, Maxey K, Lee DC, Shapiro BL, Srinivasan M, Porco T, Whitcher JP, Gaynor BD, Lietman TM. Effect of a single mass antibiotic distribution on the prevalence of infectious trachoma. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1142-6. West SK, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Holland MJ, Aguirre A, Solomon AW, Foster A, Bailey RL, Mabey DC. Infection with Chlamydia trachomatis after mass treatment of a trachoma hyperendemic community in Tanzania: a longitudinal study. Lancet. 2005 Oct 8;366(9493):1296-300. Mabey D, Fraser-Hurt N, Powell C. Antibiotics for trachoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD001860. Review. Solomon AW, Holland MJ, Alexander ND, Massae PA, Aguirre A, Natividad-Sancho A, Molina S, Safari S, Shao JF, Courtright P, Peeling RW, West SK, Bailey RL, Foster A, Mabey DC. Mass treatment with single-dose azithromycin for trachoma. N Engl J Med. 2004 Nov 4;351(19):1962-71.
Starting date: June 2005
Ending date: December 2008
Last updated: October 10, 2007
|