Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation After Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery
Information source: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Coronary Disease; Atrial Fibrillation
Intervention: Carvedilol versus Metoprolol (Drug)
Phase: N/A
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Masakazu Kuro, M.D., Ph.D., Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Department of Anesthesiology, National Cardiovascular Center
Summary
Postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication stemming
from coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and is associated with increased early and late
mortality risk. Standard guidelines recommend β blockers for the prevention of AF; however,
no prospective study has compared the relative efficacy of β-blocking agents. We hypothesize
that carvedilol, a non-selective adrenergic blocker with both anti-inflammatory and
antioxidant properties, is more effective than metoprolol, a conventional β1-selective
antagonist, in suppressing new-onset AF following off-pump coronary bypass surgery. We have
designed the Carvedilol or Metoprolol Post-Revascularization Atrial Fibrillation Controlled
Trial (COMPACT) to test our hypothesis in a multi-center, open-label, and randomized
controlled trial.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol for Atrial Fibrillation Appearing After Off-Pump Coronary Bypass Surgery in the Carvedilol or Metoprolol Post-Revascularization Atrial Fibrillation Controlled Trial (COMPACT)
Study design: Prevention, Randomized, Open Label, Active Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: The primary endpoint is the incidence of new-onset AF during the first seven days after surgery; AF is defined as an episode of atrial fibrillation or flutter lasting for >30 seconds as detected on the continuous cardiac monitor.
Secondary outcome: the incidence, duration, and recurrence of new-onset AF after surgery and before hospital dischargethe frequency of external or internal electrical cardioversion after surgery and before hospital discharge the incidence of AF rhythm at hospital discharge premature discontinuation of assigned drug administration in-hospital mortality for any cause after surgery in-hospital morbidity after surgery resource use after surgery until hospital discharge.
Detailed description:
Occurring in 20% to 50% of patients, postoperative new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF) is the
most common complication of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. Reports have
indicated that the occurrence of postoperative AF is associated with a prolonged stay in the
hospital, readmission to the intensive care unit, stroke, and, consequently, increased
overall costs. Moreover, recent results from both retrospective and prospective observational
studies suggest that its associated early and late mortality risk is high. During the past
decade, off-pump coronary bypass (OPCAB) surgery has gained widespread acceptance as an
alternative to conventional on-pump CABG surgery, as avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass and
myocardial ischemia-reperfusion is thought to significantly reduce postoperative systemic
complications. Nevertheless, recent studies have revealed that OPCAB surgery does not reduce
the incidence of postoperative AF, possibly because the consistent inflammatory differences
between on-pump CABG and OPCAB surgery are present only at the beginning of the postoperative
course, or partially because general surgical trauma may play a greater role. It has thus
been anticipated that, as with on-pump CABG surgery, OPCAB surgery has high AF-related
mortality and morbidity risks, and the prevention of new-onset AF following OPCAB surgery
should significantly reduce the risk of these outcomes. To date, most reviews reflect a
growing consensus in favor of the prophylactic administration of β blockers. In addition, the
American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines for CABG surgery
recommend β blockers for the prevention of AF. To the best of our knowledge, however, no
prospective study has evaluated the merits of a specific β-blocking agent or concluded that
each of these agents is equally efficacious.
Carvedilol, a non-selective beta adrenergic blocking agent approved for use in heart failure
cases, has a number of ancillary activities including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant
properties. Although the exact pathophysiology of new-onset AF following OPCAB surgery has
not yet been elucidated, recent reports suggest that markers of inflammation and oxidative
injury are elevated in patients with non-surgical AF. In addition, clinical studies indicate
that, unlike the β1-selective agent metoprolol, carvedilol has incremental benefits for AF
management in heart failure patients. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of
carvedilol have generated interest in its use as a prophylaxis for postoperative AF.
These considerations led to the organization of COMPACT, a multi-center, randomized
controlled trial of 650 patients designed to test the hypothesis that carvedilol is more
effective than metoprolol, a conventional β1-selective antagonist, in suppressing new-onset
AF following OPCAB surgery.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 20 Years.
Maximum age: 89 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion criteria:
Adult male or female patients are required to meet the following criteria:
1. Aged 20 to 89 years
2. Underwent isolated off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery
3. Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria:
Patients with the following conditions will be excluded from the study:
1. Pre- and intraoperative use of mechanical circulatory support devices, except an
intra-aortic balloon pump
2. Concomitant operations, such as aneurysmectomy or carotid endarterectomy
3. Surgical approaches other than a median full sternotomy
4. Acute myocardial infarction ≦3 days before enrollment in the trial
5. Contraindication against treatment with β blockers
6. Presence of preoperative chronic AF or flutter
7. History of paroxysmal AF
8. Presence of antidysrhythmic medication other than β blockers, calcium channel
blockers, or digitalis
9. A resting heart rate of less than 50 beats/min in the absence of medical therapy known
to slow the sinus rate
10. Endocrine disorders, such as pheochromocytoma, active hyperthyroidism, and untreated
hypothyroidism
11. Pregnant women and females with childbearing potential unless utilizing adequate
contraception
12. Preoperative need for a temporary or permanent pacemaker
13. Non-interpretable electrocardiogram for P wave assessment
14. Undergoing treatment for asthma or other chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
15. Second- or third-degree atrioventricular block
16. Sick sinus syndrome
17. Uncontrolled heart failure
18. Unstable insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
19. Steroid therapy requirement
20. History of autoimmune diseases
21. Active infectious diseases, including myocarditis or pericarditis
22. Any other serious disease that could potentially complicate the management and
follow-up protocols
Locations and Contacts
National Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka 565-8565, Japan
Additional Information
Starting date: January 2005
Last updated: February 28, 2007
|