Trial Comparing Daily Atropine Versus Weekend Atropine
Information source: National Eye Institute (NEI)
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on June 20, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Amblyopia
Intervention: Atropine (Drug)
Phase: Phase 4
Status: Completed
Sponsored by: National Eye Institute (NEI) Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Michael X Repka, MD, Study Chair, Affiliation: Wilmer Eye Institute Jonathan M Holmes, MD, Study Chair, Affiliation: Mayo Clinic Department of Ophthalmology
Summary
The goals of this study are:
- To compare the visual acuity outcome in the amblyopic eye after 17 weeks of daily use of
atropine versus weekend-only use of atropine.
- To compare the proportion of patients achieving a complete treatment response (defined
as amblyopic eye acuity >20/25 or equal to that of the sound eye in the absence of a
reduction in the sound eye acuity from baseline) with daily atropine versus weekend-only
atropine.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Randomized Trial Comparing Daily Atropine Versus Weekend Atropine
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Open Label, Dose Comparison, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Visual acuity
Detailed description:
Amblyopia is the most common cause of monocular visual impairment in both children and young
and middle-aged adults. Patching has been the mainstay of amblyopia therapy. It is generally
held that the response to treatment is best when it is instituted at an early age and is poor
when attempted after eight years of age.
The study ‘Occlusion versus Pharmacologic Therapy for Moderate Amblyopia’, a randomized trial
of 419 children meeting entry criteria similar to the current study, found that both atropine
1% (one drop daily) and patching (6 hours to full time daily) produced visual acuity
improvement of similar magnitude and that both are appropriate treatment modalities for the
management of moderate amblyopia in children. Patching has the potential advantage of a more
rapid improvement in visual acuity and possibly a slightly better acuity outcome, whereas
atropine has the potential advantage of easier administration and lower cost.
Through its cycloplegic effect, atropine prevents accommodation, blurring the sound eye at
near fixation. The blurring effect can be augmented by reducing the spectacle correction of
hyperopia in the sound eye. The cycloplegic effect lasts at least partially for a week or
longer. Therefore, some pediatric eye care providers believe that daily use of atropine is
unnecessary and treatment may be effective at a dosage of as little as once a week. One
advantage of less frequent dosing is a potential reduction in side effects, including any
potential adverse effect on the vision in the sound eye (reverse amblyopia), on ocular
alignment, and on binocularity. The current study will assess whether prescribing atropine
once a day produces a better visual outcome than does atropine used only on the two weekend
days.
In the âOcclusion versus Pharmacologic Therapy for Moderate Amblyopiaâ study, the 6-month
outcome data showed that more patients treated with atropine had a reduction in visual acuity
of 1 or more lines in the sound eye than did patients treated with patching. Visual acuity
was decreased from baseline by 1 line in 15% of the atropine group compared with 7% of the
patching group and by 2 or more lines in 9% of the atropine group and 1% of the patching
group. Only one patient (in the atropine group) was actively treated for a presumed
treatment-related decrease in sound eye acuity, with return of acuity to its baseline level.
Some of the cases of reduced acuity were unequivocally due to the use of improper refractive
correction for the sound eye testing (including nine cases in which the testing was done with
a plano lens prescribed for therapeutic effect rather than the proper corrective lens). In
other cases, we speculated that there was a residual cycloplegic effect of atropine combined
with improper refractive correction related to previously latent hyperopia becoming manifest
hyperopia during the period of atropine treatment, although there were not data to fully
document this in all cases. All 47 atropine group patients with a decrease of one or more
lines at six months have had subsequent follow-up exams. Acuity on the subsequent testing was
the same or better than that at baseline in 42 of the 47 patients: 22 while still on atropine
treatment (11 with the same refractive correction and 11 with a different refractive
correction) and 20 after atropine was discontinued (6 with the same refractive correction and
14 with a different refractive correction). In the other five patients, acuity on subsequent
testing was decreased from baseline by one line (3 on atropine, 2 off atropine). Thus, there
did not appear to be a long-term safety concern for atropine, but the data were inconclusive
as to whether atropine caused an actual, though transient, treatment-related decrease in
sound eye acuity. One of the objectives of the current study will be to provide additional
data on the effect of atropine on the sound eye.
The study is a randomized trial comparing atropine regimes for children with moderate
amblyopia. It will consist of about 160 children. Patients in the daily atropine group
receive atropine 1% one drop daily in the sound eye. Patients in the weekend atropine group
will receive atropine 1% twice a week (Saturday and Sunday) in the sound eye. Visual acuity
is the major study outcome. It is measured after 17 weeks of treatment with either daily or
weekend atropine.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 3 Years.
Maximum age: 7 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age < 7 years
- Able to measure surrounded single optotype visual acuity using the ATS single-surround
HOTV protocol (this will in effect exclude all patients <2 years old and many <3 years
old)
- Amblyopia associated with strabismus, anisometropia, or both
- If anisometropia is present (as per protocol definition), refractive error corrected
with spectacles for a minimum of 4 weeks
- Visual acuity in the amblyopic eye < 20/40 and >20/80
- Visual acuity in the sound eye > 20/40 and inter-eye acuity difference >3 logMAR
lines
Exclusion Criteria:
- Amblyopia treatment (other than spectacles) in the past month and no more than one
month of amblyopia treatment in the past 6 months
- Myopia more than a spherical equivalent of -6. 00 D in the amblyopic eye
- Myopia more than a spherical equivalent of -0. 50 D in the sound eye
Locations and Contacts
Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-9028, United States
Additional Information
NEI Clinical Studies Database
Starting date: June 2002
Ending date: April 2003
Last updated: April 3, 2006
|