Losartan Versus Atenolol for the Treatment of Marfan Syndrome
Information source: University of British Columbia
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on October 19, 2009 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Marfan Syndrome
Intervention: Losartan (Drug); Atenolol (Drug)
Phase: Phase 2
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: University of British Columbia Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): George Sandor, MD, FRCPC, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: University of British Columbia Cornelius van Breemen, MD, Study Director, Affiliation: University of British Columbia James E. Potts, MD, Study Director, Affiliation: University of British Columbia
Overall contact: Leslie Raffin, RN, Phone: 778-388-3162, Email: lraffin@cw.bc.ca
Summary
Marfan syndrome is a genetic disease of our connective tissue, which provides material and
support for our skeleton, muscles, blood vessels and other parts of our bodies. People with
Marfan syndrome may be tall and thin with slender, tapering fingers, long arms and legs, and
spine curvature. They often have heart and eye problems. In some patients, the condition is
very mild and the person has few or no symptoms. Others are always at risk of
life-threatening problems, which usually involve damage to the valves in the heart or
weakening of the large blood vessels leading from the heart. If the blood vessels become
weak, they can balloon out (dilate) and break (rupture), which might cause the person to die
suddenly. We have only a limited ability to stop the progression of disease in Marfan
syndrome. Typically we use medicines that lower heart rate or blood pressure (or both). But
this does not prevent the disease and very few drugs work well enough to keep patients from
needing surgery or dying suddenly because a blood vessel has torn open. Our objective is to
study two medicines to see if one, or both, can improve blood vessel function in patients
with Marfan syndrome. One (Atenolol) belongs to a group of drugs called beta blockers and is
often used to treat high blood pressure. It is the most common drug that is currently used
to treat patients with Marfan syndrome. The other (Losartan) is also used for high blood
pressure, but works in a different way. This study will help us to find better ways to
treat people who have Marfan syndrome and to identify early changes in blood vessel function
that may help to prevent long-term complications.
Clinical Details
Official title: A Randomized Double-Blind Study Assessing the Effects of Losartan Versus Atenolol on Pulse Wave Velocity and the Biophysical Properties of the Aorta in Patients With Marfan Syndrome
Study design: Treatment, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Uncontrolled, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Pulse Wave Velocity
Secondary outcome: Biophysical properties of the aortaBrachial artery reactivity Aortic root dimension and area
Detailed description:
The objective of the proposed research is to conduct a randomized, double-blind superiority
feasibility study to compare the effects of two types of medication (Losartan, an
Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, and Atenolol, a beta blocker) on vascular function in patients
with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Our outcomes will include measuring the pulse wave velocity
(PWV) and other biophysical properties of the aorta in the two groups of patients. This
study will provide essential pilot data and development of logistics to enable a full
multi-centre randomized controlled trial to test the hypothesis that Losartan will improve
vascular function and, in the long-term, slow the rate of aortic root dilation.
MFS is an inherited disorder that affects 1: 5000 of the population (i. e., 6000 people) in
Canada alone. In MFS, mutations in the FBN1 gene lead to production of abnormal fibrillin 1
and to connective tissue abnormalities that impair skeletal, ocular, pulmonary and, most
importantly, cardiovascular systems. Cardiovascular complications are also related to
endothelial dysfunction, which has widespread implications for the health of large and
muscular blood vessels and has effects on blood pressure, thrombosis, cholesterol levels and
general vascular homeostasis. In MFS, progressive dilation, dissection and rupture of the
aortic root may occur. This dilation is not solely due to the primary abnormality in
collagen caused by the abnormal fibrillin protein. It remains unclear what the vascular
mechanisms are that cause dilation of the aortic root. Eventual aortic rupture is a major
cause of sudden death in MFS. If untreated, MFS significantly shortens the lifespan of
affected individuals: half will succumb in their late 20s or early 30s, usually of aortic
rupture. As such, it is crucial to develop effective treatments for cardiovascular disease
in MFS and to improve our ability to detect critical changes in blood vessel (aortic)
structure and function.
Clinical management of cardiovascular disease in individuals with MFS aims to decrease the
rate of aortic root dilation and reduce the risk of dissection and rupture. Beta blockers
(eg. Atenolol) have been the traditional medical treatment although some studies have cited
the success of calcium antagonists or angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors,
However, while beta blocker treatment has been successful in reducing the rate of dilation
of the aorta, and its complications in MFS, studies report inconsistent responses to
treatment and one pediatric study showed no benefit of beta blockers and better results with
ACE inhibitors. Thus, it is still unclear whether one or the other of these pharmacological
agents improves outcomes in regard to aortic dilation or rupture.
Recently, individuals with MFS have been shown to have dysregulation of transforming growth
factor beta (TGF-beta) signaling that is postulated to result in the enlarged aortic root
and other manifestations of the disease. Conversely, disorders of TGF beta 1 and 2 receptors
have been shown to produce a Marfan phenotype. A study using a Marfan mouse model found that
Losartan, an angiotensin 2 AT1 receptor blocker, prevented the development of aortic root
dilation and other phenotypic manifestations of the syndrome. Among the actions of Losartan
is the prevention of increased levels of TGF beta and its effects on stimulation of
production of extracellular matrix in vascular smooth muscle. This evidence suggests that
agents that alter TGF beta signalling, such as Losartan, might have significant potential to
ameliorate endothelial dysfunction and aortic dilation in MFS. A clinical trial comparing
the effects of Losartan with the current standard treatment regimen (beta blockers) is
needed.
Ultimately, even treated individuals suffer from aortic dilation, so that surgical repair of
the dilated aortic root is definitive in MFS. Elective surgery carries a low mortality and
has significantly improved life expectancy; in contrast, emergency surgery for aortic root
dissection or rupture carries a much higher mortality. Our earlier clinical studies and more
recent work in a Marfan mouse model study suggest that aortic root dilation is a later stage
in the disease process, which has involved cellular mechanisms (perhaps related to TGF beta)
before aortic root dilation occurs. This suggests that, through research, one might enable
clinicians to identify individuals who are in the early stages of vessel dilation and/or who
are at risk for aortic rupture. If we could improve our capacity for early diagnosis of
aortic root dilation, we could intervene in the pre-clinical stages and minimize the
incidence of emergency surgery or sudden death.
Towards this goal, our group has developed a novel method of assessing the biophysical
properties of the aorta by standard Echo Doppler techniques and have developed an accurate
measure of PWV, which is considered the most important index of vascular function. In
patients with MFS, we have demonstrated increased pulse wave velocity, reduced
distensibility, increased stiffness in the large central arteries, and endothelial
dysfunction—even if the aortic root had not yet dilated (see appended paper).
On the basis of these studies, we have also been given access to proprietary GE software to
analyze raw data and have developed a software program that analyses the Doppler pulse flow
and external carotid artery pressure tracing raw data to obtain parameters that previously
required invasive techniques or laborious manual techniques to calculate. Using this new
technique, which is unique to our group and applicable to other conditions that affect the
aorta, we can now measure several key variables of aortic vessel function, including
vascular distensibility, stiffness indices, impedances, total arterial compliance,
reflective wave index, left ventricular work and efficiency. We predict that using this
method to make a comprehensive assessment of aortic vascular (dys)function will provide for
early detection of vascular changes and enable an improved comparison of the effectiveness
of pharmacological treatment of cardiovascular disease in MFS.
Therefore, the objective of the proposed research is to use this methodology to compare
aortic vascular function in individuals with MFS under conventional treatment using a beta
blocker (Atenolol) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (Losartan). We propose a randomized,
prospective, double-blinded superiority study to compare the actions of Losartan with
Atenolol on vascular function in a group of 30 patients with MFS. Our research group has the
unique capability to perform an analysis of the vascular effects of these therapies.
The Specific Aims are as follows:
1. To determine whether 12 months of treatment with Losartan decreases PWV more than 12
months of treatment with Atenolol in a cohort of patients with MFS;
2. To determine whether 12 months of treatment with Losartan will improve indices of
distensibility, stiffness, arterial compliance, impedances and endothelial function
more than 12 months of treatment with Atenolol in the same cohort of patients with MFS;
3. To determine whether 12 months of treatment with Losartan slows the progression of
aortic root dilation when compared to 12 months of treatment with Atenolol in the same
cohort of patients with MFS.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 12 Years.
Maximum age: 25 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Subjects must conform to the diagnostic criteria for MFS;
2. Subjects must be between 12 and 25 years;
3. Subjects must have technically suitable echocardiographic windows to obtain the
images needed to calculate the biophysical properties listed as outcome measures;
4. Subjects must provide informed consent and/or assent.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Patients with significant aortic or mitral valve regurgitation;
2. Patients with a medical condition that would preclude them from taking either of the
study medications or be taken off either medication for a brief period of time;
3. Female patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or breast-feeding.
Locations and Contacts
Leslie Raffin, RN, Phone: 778-388-3162, Email: lraffin@cw.bc.ca
Children's Heart Centre, British Columbia's Children's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia V6H 3V4, Canada; Recruiting Leslie Raffin, RN, Phone: 778-388-3162, Email: lraffin@cw.bc.ca
Additional Information
Starting date: January 2008
Ending date: December 2009
Last updated: July 8, 2008
|