Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass- Specific Aim 3
Information source: Vanderbilt University
Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on November 03, 2008 Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
Condition(s) targeted: Coronary Arteriosclerosis
Intervention: HOE 140 (Drug); Aminocaproic Acid (Drug); Placebo (Drug)
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Status: Recruiting
Sponsored by: Vanderbilt University Official(s) and/or principal investigator(s): Mias Pretorius, MBChB, Principal Investigator, Affiliation: Vanderbilt University
Overall contact: Patricia Wright, RN, Phone: (615) 343 0908, Email: patricia.wright@vanderbilt.edu
Summary
Each year over a million patients worldwide undergo cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary
bypass (CPB). CPB is associated with significant morbidity including the transfusion of
allogenic blood products, inflammation and hemodynamic instability. In fact, approximately
20% of all blood products transfused are associated with coronary artery bypass grafting
procedures. Transfusion of allogenic blood products is associated with well-documented
morbidity and increased mortality after cardiac surgery. Enhanced fibrinolysis contributes to
increased blood product transfusion in the perioperative period. The current proposal tests
the central hypothesis that endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic,
fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will
reduce hypotension, inflammation and transfusion requirements. In SPECIFIC AIM 1 we will test
the hypothesis that the fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differ during ACE
inhibition and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonism. In SPECIFIC AIM 2 we will test the
hypothesis that bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism attenuates the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic,
and inflammatory response to CPB. In SPECIFIC AIM 3 we will test the hypothesis that
bradykinin B2 receptor antagonism reduces the risk of allogenic blood product transfusion in
patients undergoing CPB. These studies promise to provide important information regarding the
effects of drugs that interrupt the RAS and generate new strategies to reduce morbidity in
patients undergoing CPB.
Clinical Details
Official title: Bradykinin Receptor Antagonism During Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Study design: Prevention, Randomized, Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor), Placebo Control, Parallel Assignment, Efficacy Study
Primary outcome: Allogenic blood product transfusion risk.
Secondary outcome: Number of transfusions in patients exposed to blood productsBlood loss Renal dysfunction Dysrhythmias Prolonged intubation
Detailed description:
Morbidity of cardiopulmonary bypass. Each year more than a million patients worldwide
undergo cardiac surgery. Nearly all cardiac surgeries are performed on unbeating hearts
supported by CPB. Although the use of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery procedures are
increasing, concerns regarding incomplete revascularization and reduced venous graft patency
limit the use of this technique to specific patients. CPB activates various humoral cascades
including the coagulation cascade, the KKS, the fibrinolytic cascade, and causes a systemic
inflammatory response syndrome. Activation of these systems can lead to hypotension, fever,
disseminated intravascular coagulation, diffuse tissue edema, or, in extreme cases, to
multiple organ failure. Activation of the KKS contributes to the hemodynamic perturbations,
fibrinolysis and inflammatory response observed in patients undergoing CPB. Aprotinin, a
non-specific serine protease inhibitor, that works in part by decreasing bradykinin
generation, decreases fibrinolysis, hypotension and the systemic inflammatory response
associated with CPB. Aprotinin decreases blood loss and transfusion requirements, however,
its use is mainly limited to redo-cardiac surgery because of cost. Other factors that may
limit the widespread use of aprotinin include an increased risk for renal dysfunction,
allergic reaction and non-specificity of the drug. Bradykinin mediates most of the effects of
the KKS. Thus, bradykinin receptor antagonism has the potential to modulate the effects of
KKS activation during CPB. The purpose of this proposal is to test the hypothesis that
endogenous bradykinin contributes to the hemodynamic, fibrinolytic and inflammatory response
to CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism will reduce hypotension, inflammation and
transfusion requirements. The proposed studies promise to lead to novel therapies to reduce
morbidity associated with CPB.
Cardiopulmonary bypass activates the kallikrein-kinin system (KKS). Several groups, including
ours, have reported that bradykinin concentrations increase during CPB. For example, Campbell
et al demonstrated that bradykinin levels increase 10 to 20-fold during the first 10 minutes
of CPB, returned to basal levels by 70 minutes of CPB and remained 1. 7 to 5. 2-fold elevated
after CPB. Plasma and tissue kallikrein were reduced by 80 and 60% respectively, during the
first minute of CPB. Similarly, we have demonstrated that bradykinin increases significantly
during CPB and that ACE inhibition and smoking potentiate the kinin response during CPB.
Fibrinolytic response to cardiopulmonary bypass. CPB increases t-PA antigen and activity in a
time-dependent manner. The fibrinolytic response during CPB is heterogeneous, with t-PA
levels varying as much as 250-fold. The mechanism of t-PA release during CPB is likely
multifactorial. As outlined above, we and others have shown that CPB increases bradykinin, a
potent stimulus to t-PA release. In addition, thrombin or complement generated during CPB may
stimulate the release of t-PA from endothelium. In addition to the changes in t-PA
concentrations during CPB, PAI-1 activity falls because of hemodilution and the rise in t-PA
release which consumes active PAI-1. Plasmin generation increases over 100-fold while D-dimer
generation increases 200-fold within 5 minutes of CPB initiation. For the remainder of the
CPB, average plasmin and D-dimer levels remain 20-fold to 30-fold above baseline levels. The
postoperative period is marked by a systemic inflammatory response caused by a combination of
CPB and surgery producing an acute - phase response that results in increased PAI-1
production. PAI-1 levels begin to rise about 2 hours after surgery. Once CPB is over, PAI-1
levels continue to rise and peak during the first 12-36 hours postoperatively and return to
normal by the second postoperative day. Thus, the fibrinolytic response to CPB is
characterized by an initial hyperfibrinolytic phase that begins with a rapid rise in t-PA,
plasmin, and D-dimer concentrations followed by a postoperative hypofibrinolytic phase
associated with a rise in PAI-1 secretion and a fall in t-PA concentrations.
Interaction between the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), the KKS and fibrinolytic system.
There is evidence that fibrinolytic balance is regulated by the RAS and the KKS. ACE is
strategically poised to control fibrinolytic balance by promoting the breakdown of
bradykinin and the conversion of Ang I to Ang II. Ang II causes the release of PAI-1 thus
inhibiting fibrinolysis. Bradykinin stimulates t-PA release through its B2 receptor. ACE
inhibition decreases PAI-1 antigen levels and increases endothelial t-PA release through
endogenous bradykinin. In addition, ACE inhibition enhances exogenous bradykinin-mediated
vasodilation and t-PA release. The augmentation of bradykinin-induced vasodilation, the
increase in t-PA and the decrease in PAI-1 described with ACE inhibition in patients with
ischemic heart disease may contribute to the primary mechanism of the anti-ischemic effects
associated with chronic ACE inhibitor therapy. We have demonstrated that inpatients
undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) requiring CPB, not only did ACE inhibition
increase fibrinolytic activity by decreasing PAI-1 antigen and increasing t-PA activity, but
also enhanced the kinin response. Increased PAI-1 concentrations in the perioperative period
are associated with acute vein graft thrombosis. Thus, ACE inhibitors have a potential to
reduce the risk of acute graft thrombosis through their effects on Ang II generation by
attenuating the PAI-1 response after CABG. As opposed to the beneficial effects of ACE
inhibition on PAI-1, the augmentation of the kinin response during CPB may have detrimental
effects including increased fibrinolysis with consequent bleeding and hypotension. The effect
of angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist on the fibrinolytic response to CPB is
not known. Inpatients with essential hypertension AT1 receptor antagonist decreases PAI-1
antigen in some but not other studies. In Specific Aim 1 we will test the hypothesis that
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and AT1 receptor antagonist modulate the
fibrinolytic and inflammatory response to CPB differently.
Bradykinin receptor antagonism could reduce the hypotensive response to CPB. Low systemic
vascular resistance (SVR) commonly occurs during and early after CPB. It is usually transient
and easy to treat. Occasionally, patients have a more severe and persistent fall in SVR,
referred to postoperative vasodilatory shock. Risk factors for vasodilatory shock includes
the preoperative use of ACE inhibitors, low left ventricular ejection fraction and heart
failure syndrome. Treatment is frequently required to maintain adequate perfusion pressure
during CPB and to establish satisfactory hemodynamics when ready to separate the patient from
bypass. This usually entails counteracting the effect of the vasodilatory mediators by
administration of drugs such as norepinephrine or phenylephrine. Although usually effective
and safe, these drugs can redistribute blood flow in such a way as to compromise the
splanchnic and renal circulation. Several mediators are thought to be responsible for
producing postoperative shock, including bradykinin. For example, there is an inverse
correlation between bradykinin concentrations and mean arterial pressure during CPB,
suggesting that bradykinin is an important mediator in the decrease in SVR. We and others
have shown that bradykinin induces vasodilation through its B2 receptor. In contract, B1
receptor stimulation does not cause vasodilation. As outlined under PRELIMINARY STUDIES, we
have demonstrated that endogenous bradykinin contributes to protamine-related hypotension
following CPB and that bradykinin receptor antagonism administered just prior to protamine
attenuates this hypotensive response. In Specific Aim 2 we will test the hypothesis that
bradykinin receptor antagonism modulate the hemodynamic changes observed during CPB.
Bradykinin receptor antagonism could reduce hyperfibrinolysis and CPB-associated blood loss.
Inhibiting hyperfibrinolysis during CPB reduces blood loss and blood product requirements. On
the other hand, modulating the hypofibrinolytic phase after CPB has the potential to reduce
thrombotic complications. We and others have shown that bradykinin stimulates t-PA release
from human forearm vasculature and the coronary circulation through a NO
synthase-independent, and cyclooxygenase-independent pathway. As with vasodilation,
bradykinin-stimulated t-PA release is mediated via the B2 receptor. Several groups have
reported that bradykinin concentrations increase during CPB. We demonstrated a direct
correlation between bradykinin and t-PA concentrations during CPB suggesting that bradykinin
plays an important role in activating the fibrinolytic response during CPB. As outlined under
PRELIMINARY STUDIES we have shown that HOE 140 (a B2 receptor antagonist) administered prior
to CPB blunts the increase in D-dimer similar to e-aminocaproic acid. Thus, B2 receptor
antagonism has the potential to reduce bradykinin-mediated fibrinolysis during CPB. In
Specific Aim 2 we will test the hypothesis that bradykinin receptor antagonism modulate the
fibrinolytic response observed during CPB.
Bradykinin receptor antagonism could reduce the inflammatory response to CPB. During CPB,
exposure of blood to bioincompatible surfaces of the extracorporeal circuit, as well as
tissue ischemia and reperfusion associated with the procedure, induce the activation of
several major humoral pathways of inflammation. Bradykinin produces many of the
characteristics of the inflammatory state, such as changes in local blood pressure, edema,
and pain, resulting in vasodilation and increased microvessel permeability. Bradykinin
activates NF-kB and upregulates interleukin(IL)-1b and TNFa-stimulated IL-8 production
through the B2 receptor. In addition, bradykinin stimulates the release of IL-6 from a
variety of cells. The growing knowledge of the biological role of kinins, in particular in
inflammation, has fueled the development of potent and selective kinin receptor antagonist as
potential therapeutics. For example, the bradykinin antagonist, deltibant (CP-0127) showed a
significant improvement in the 28-day risk-adjusted survival of patients with gram-negative
sepsis. In an animal model of intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury, B2 receptor antagonism
inhibited reperfusion induced increases in vascular permeability, neutrophil recruitment and
expression of B1 receptor mRNA. The role of B2 receptor antagonist in myocardial
ischemia-reperfusion injury is more controversial. Kumari et al demonstrated a protective
effect of HOE 140 during in vivo ischemia-reperfusion injury, whereas in isolated rabbit
heart studies, CP-0127 impaired recovery from acute coronary ischemia. This contradictory
results may be the result of different antagonist used, differences in species sensitivity or
different experimental protocols. The role of B1 receptor antagonist in inflammation is
unclear. In contrast to the constitutively expressed bradykinin B2 receptor, bradykinin B1
receptor expression is upregulated following an inflammatory insult or ischemia-reperfusion
injury. It appears that each kinin receptor subtype mediates different aspects of the
inflammatory response. However, B1 receptor antagonism administered prior to CPB may be
detrimental. For example, Siebeck et al demonstrated that B2 receptor blockade attenuates
endotoxin-induced mortality in pigs, whereas additional B1 receptor blockade seemed to
reverse these beneficial effects. Taken together, B2 receptor antagonism may decrease the
acute inflammatory response whereas additional B1 receptor blockade may be harmful. These
studies, and also the fact that aprotinin exerts part of its beneficial effects through a
reduction in bradykinin concentrations, suggest the hypothesis that pharmacological
strategies to block the bradykinin B2 receptor may be superior to reducing bradykinin
concentrations in modulating the inflammatory response to CPB.
The RAS, KKS and inflammation. Activation of the RAS exerts proinflammatory effects. For
example, Ang II activates the transcription factor nuclear factor (NF)-kB, which in turn
regulates genes involved in cellular recruitment and the inflammatory cytokine cascade. Ang
II induces the synthesis and secretion of the inflammatory interleukin (IL)-6. As mentioned
above, bradykinin produces many of the characteristics of the inflammatory state and
upregulates IL-1b and TNFa-stimulated IL-8 and stimulates the release of IL-6. Thus, both
Ang II and bradykinin stimulates the release of IL-6. ACE inhibitor treatment is associated
with a reduction in IL-6 response to CPB. In a randomized non-blinded study, Trevelyan and
colleagues20 demonstrated that ACE inhibition produced a highly significant decrease of 51%
in the release of IL-6 in patients identified as high producers of IL-6 by the - 174 G/C
polymorphism, whereas losartan had a similar but less marked effect. Potential mechanisms for
this variation in IL-6 response between ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocker may
be due to their differential effect on Ang II formation and bradykinin degradation.
Furthermore, bradykinin-induced increases in IL-6 protein and total mRNA are inhibited by the
selective B2 receptor antagonist HOE-140 but not by a selective B1 receptor antagonist. In
Specific Aim 1 we will test the hypothesis that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and
angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonist modulate the fibrinolytic and inflammatory
response to CPB differently.
Eligibility
Minimum age: 18 Years.
Maximum age: 80 Years.
Gender(s): Both.
Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Subjects, 18 to 80 years of age, scheduled for elective CABG requiring CPB
2. For female subjects, the following conditions must be met:
postmenopausal for at least 1 year, or status-post surgical sterilization, or if of
childbearing potential, utilizing adequate birth control and willing to undergo urine
beta-hcg testing prior to drug treatment and on every study day
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Evidence of coagulopathy (INR greater than 1. 7 without warfarin therapy)
2. Preoperative hematocrit less than 30%
3. Preoperative platelet count less than 100X109ml-1
4. GPIIb/IIIa antagonist within 48 hours of surgery
5. Emergency surgery
6. Impaired renal function (serum creatinine >1. 6 mg/dl)
7. Pregnancy
8. Breast-feeding
9. Any underlying or acute disease requiring regular medication which could possibly pose
a threat to the subject or make implementation of the protocol or interpretation of
the study results difficult
10. History of alcohol or drug abuse
11. Treatment with any investigational drug in the 1 month preceding the study
12. Mental conditions rendering the subject unable to understand the nature, scope and
possible consequences of the study
13. Inability to comply with the protocol, e. g. uncooperative attitude and unlikelihood of
completing the study
Locations and Contacts
Patricia Wright, RN, Phone: (615) 343 0908, Email: patricia.wright@vanderbilt.edu
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States; Recruiting Patricia Wright, RN, Phone: 615-343-0908, Email: patricia.wright@vanderbilt.edu Mias Pretorius, MBChB, Principal Investigator
TN Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, United States; Recruiting Patricia Wright, RN, Phone: 615-343-0908, Email: patricia.wright@Vanderbilt.edu Mias Pretorius, MBChB, Principal Investigator
Additional Information
Starting date: May 2006
Ending date: November 2011
Last updated: September 16, 2008
|