CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
MECHANISM OF ACTION
Xolair inhibits the binding of IgE to the high-affinity IgE receptor (Fc(epsilon)RI) on the surface of mast cells and basophils. Reduction in surface-bound IgE on Fc(epsilon)RI-bearing cells limits the degree of release of mediators of the allergic response. Treatment with Xolair also reduces the number of Fc(epsilon)RI receptors on basophils in atopic patients.
PHARMACOKINETICS
After SC administration, Omalizumab is absorbed with an average absolute bioavailability of 62%. Following a single SC dose in adult and adolescent patients with asthma, Omalizumab was absorbed slowly, reaching peak serum concentrations after an average of 7-8 days. The pharmacokinetics of Omalizumab are linear at doses greater than 0.5 mg/kg. Following multiple doses of Omalizumab, areas under the serum concentration-time curve from Day 0 to Day 14 at steady state were up to 6-fold of those after the first dose.
In vitro, Omalizumab forms complexes of limited size with IgE. Precipitating complexes and complexes larger than 1 million daltons in molecular weight are not observed in vitro or in vivo. Tissue distribution studies in cynomolgus monkeys showed no specific uptake of125 I-Omalizumab by any organ or tissue. The apparent volume of distribution in patients following SC administration was 78±32 mL/kg.
Clearance of Omalizumab involves IgG clearance processes as well as clearance via specific binding and complex formation with its target ligand, IgE. Liver elimination of IgG includes degradation in the liver reticuloendothelial system (RES) and endothelial cells. Intact IgG is also excreted in bile. In studies with mice and monkeys, Omalizumab:IgE complexes were eliminated by interactions with Fc(gamma) receptors within the RES at rates that were generally faster than IgG clearance. In asthma patients Omalizumab serum elimination half-life averaged 26 days, with apparent clearance averaging 2.4±1.1 mL/kg/day. In addition, doubling body weight approximately doubled apparent clearance.
PHARMACODYNAMICS
In clinical studies, serum free IgE levels were reduced in a dose dependent manner within 1 hour following the first dose and maintained between doses. Mean serum free IgE decrease was greater than 96% using recommended doses. Serum total IgE levels (i.e., bound and unbound) increased after the first dose due to the formation of Omalizumab:IgE complexes, which have a slower elimination rate compared with free IgE. At 16 weeks after the first dose, average serum total IgE levels were five-fold higher compared with pre-treatment when using standard assays. After discontinuation of Xolair dosing, the Xolair-induced increase in total IgE and decrease in free IgE were reversible, with no observed rebound in IgE levels after drug washout. Total IgE levels did not return to pre-treatment levels for up to one year after discontinuation of Xolair.
SPECIAL POPULATIONS
The population pharmacokinetics of Xolair were analyzed to evaluate the effects of demographic characteristics. Analyses of these limited data suggest that no dose adjustments are necessary for age (12-76 years), race, ethnicity, or gender.
CLINICAL STUDIES
The safety and efficacy of Xolair were evaluated in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trials.
The trials enrolled patients 12 to 76 years old, with moderate to severe persistent (NHLBI criteria) asthma for at least one year, and a positive skin test reaction to a perennial aeroallergen. At screening, patients in Studies 1 and 2 had a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) between 40% and 80% predicted, while in Study 3 there was no restriction on screening FEV1. All patients had a FEV1 improvement of at least 12% following beta-agonist administration. All patients were symptomatic and were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and short acting beta-agonists. In Study 3, long-acting beta-agonists were allowed. Study 3 patients were receiving at least 1000 µg/day fluticasone propionate and a subset was also receiving oral corticosteroids. Patients receiving other concomitant controller medications were excluded, and initiation of additional controller medications while on study was prohibited. Patients currently smoking were excluded.
Each study was comprised of a run-in period to achieve a stable conversion to a common ICS (beclomethasone dipropionate, for Studies 1 and 2; fluticasone propionate for Study 3), followed by randomization to Xolair or placebo. In Study 3, patients were stratified by use of ICS-only or ICS with concomitant use of oral steroids. Patients received Xolair for 16 weeks with an unchanged corticosteroid dose unless an acute exacerbation necessitated an increase. Patients then entered an ICS reduction phase of 12 weeks (Studies 1 and 2) or 16 weeks (Study 3) during which ICS (or oral steroid in Study 3 subset) dose reduction was attempted in a step-wise manner.
Xolair dosing was based on body weight and baseline serum total IgE concentration. All patients were required to have a baseline IgE between 30 and 700 IU/mL and body weight not more than 150 kg. Patients were treated according to a dosing table to administer at least 0.016 mg/kg/IU (IgE/mL) of Xolair or a matching volume of placebo over each 4-week period. The maximum Xolair dose per 4 weeks was 750 mg; patients who had a weight-IgE combination that yielded a dose greater than 750 mg were excluded from the studies. Patients who were to receive more than 300 mg within the 4-week period were administered half the total dose every 2 weeks.
The distribution of the number of asthma exacerbations per patient in each group during a study was analyzed separately for the stable steroid and steroid-reduction periods. In all three studies an exacerbation was defined as a worsening of asthma that required treatment with systemic corticosteroids or a doubling of the baseline ICS dose.
In both Studies 1 and 2 the number of exacerbations per patient was reduced in patients treated with Xolair compared with placebo (Table 1). In Study 3 the number of exacerbations in patients treated with Xolair was similar to that in placebo-treated patients (Table 2). The absence of an observed treatment effect in Study 3 may be related to differences in the patient population compared with Studies 1 and 2, study sample size, or other factors. In all three studies most exacerbations were managed in the out-patient setting and the majority were treated with systemic steroids. Hospitalization rates were not significantly different between Xolair and placebo-treated patients; however, the overall hospitalization rate was small. Among those patients who experienced an exacerbation, the distribution of exacerbation severity was similar between treatment groups.
Table 1
Frequency of Asthma Exacerbations per Patient by Phase in Studies 1 and 2
|
Stable Steroid Phase (16 wks) |
|
Study 1
|
Study 2
|
Exacerbations per
patient
|
Xolair
N=268
(%)
|
Placebo
N=257
(%)
|
Xolair
N=274
(%)
|
Placebo
N=272
(%)
|
0
|
85.8
|
76.7
|
87.6
|
69.9
|
1
|
11.9
|
16.7
|
11.3
|
25.0
|
>/=2
|
2.2
|
6.6
|
1.1
|
5.1
|
p-Value
|
0.005
|
<0.001
|
Mean number
exacerbations/patient
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
0.1
|
0.4
|
|
Steroid Reduction Phase (12 wks) |
Exacerbations per
patient
|
Xolair
N=268
(%)
|
Placebo
N=257
(%)
|
Xolair
N=274
(%)
|
Placebo
N=272
(%)
|
0
|
78.7
|
67.7
|
83.9
|
70.2
|
1
|
19.0
|
28.4
|
14.2
|
26.1
|
>/=2
|
2.2
|
3.9
|
1.8
|
3.7
|
p-Value
|
0.004
|
<0.001
|
Mean number
exacerbations/patient
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
|
Table 2
Percentage of Patients with Asthma Exacerbations by Subgroup and Phase in Study 3
|
Stable Steroid Phase (16 wks) |
|
Inhaled Only
|
Oral+Inhaled
|
|
Xolair
N=126
|
Placebo
N=120
|
Xolair
N=50
|
Placebo
N=45
|
% Patients with
>/=1 exacerbations
|
15.9
|
15.0
|
32.0
|
22.2
|
Difference
(95% CI)
|
0.9
(-9.7, 13.7) |
9.8
(-10.5, 31.4) |
|
Steroid Reduction Phase (16 wks) |
|
Xolair
N=126
|
Placebo
N=120
|
Xolair
N=50
|
Placebo
N=45
|
% Patients with
>/=1 exacerbations
|
22.2
|
26.7
|
42.0
|
42.2
|
Difference
(95% CI)
|
-4.4
(-17.6, 7.4) |
-0.2
(-22.4, 20.1) |
|
In all three of the studies, a reduction of asthma exacerbations was not observed in the Xolair-treated patients who had FEV1 >80% at the time of randomization. Reductions in exacerbations were not seen in patients who required oral steroids as maintenance therapy.
In Studies 1 and 2 measures of airflow (FEV1) and asthma symptoms were evaluated (Table 3). The clinical relevance of the treatment-associated differences is unknown.
Table 3
Asthma Symptoms and Pulmonary Function During Stable Steroid Phase of Study 1
|
Xolair
N=268 a |
Placebo
N=257 a |
Endpoint
|
Mean
Baseline
|
Median Change
(Baseline to Wk 16)
|
Mean
Baseline
|
Median Change
(Baseline to Wk 16)
|
Total asthma symptom score
|
4.3
|
-1.5 b |
4.2
|
-1.1 b |
Nocturnal asthma score
|
1.2
|
-0.4 b |
1.1
|
-0.2 b |
Daytime asthma score
|
2.3
|
-0.9 b |
2.3
|
-0.6 b |
FEV1 % predicted
|
68
|
3 b |
68
|
0 b |
Asthma symptom scale: total score from 0 (least) to 9 (most); nocturnal and daytime scores from 0 (least) to 4 (most symptoms). a Number of patients available for analysis ranges 255-258 in the Xolair group and 238-239 in the placebo group.
|
b Comparison of Xolair versus placebo (p<0.05). |
|
Results from the stable steroid phase of Study 2 and the steroid reduction phases of both Studies 1 and 2 were similar to those presented in Table 3.
|