SEPTRA SUMMARY
SEPTRA (trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole) is a synthetic antibacterial combination product.
SEPTRA is indicated for the following:
Urinary Tract Infections: For the treatment of urinary tract infections due to susceptible strains of the following organisms: Escherichia coli, Kelbsiella
species,
Enterobacter
species,
Morganella morganii, Proteus mirabilis,
and
Proteus vulgaris.
It is recommended that initial episodes of uncomplicated urinary tract infections be treated with a single effective antibacterial agent rather than the combination.
Acute Otitis Media: For the treatment of acute otitis media in pediatric patients due to susceptible strains of
Streptococcus pneumoniae
or
Haemophilus influenzae
when, in the judgment of the physician, SEPTRA offers some advantage over the use of other antimicrobial agents. To date, there are limited data on the safety of repeated use of SEPTRA in pediatric patients under two years of age. SEPTRA is not indicated for prophylactic or prolonged administration in otitis media at any age.
Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Bronchitis in Adults: For the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis due to susceptible strains of
Streptococcus pneumoniae
or
Haemophilus influenzae
when, in the judgment of the physician, SEPTRA offers some advantage over the use of a single antimicrobial agent.
Travelers' Diarrhea in Adults: For the treatment of travelers' diarrhea due to susceptible strains of enterotoxigenic
E. coli.
Shigellosis: For the treatment of enteritis caused by susceptible strains of
Shigella flexneri
and
Shigella sonnei
when antibacterial therapy is indicated.
Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia: For the treatment of documented
Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia. For prophylaxis against
Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia in individuals who are immunosuppressed and considered to be at an increased risk of developing
Pneumocystis carinii
pneumonia.
|
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
Published Studies Related to Septra (Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole)
Effect of long-term trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole treatment on resistance and integron prevalence in the intestinal flora: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in children. [2009.05] OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole selects for integron-positive and multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the intestinal flora... CONCLUSIONS: Initially, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole usage was strongly associated with the appearance of integron-positive (multi)drug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in the intestinal flora. After prolonged exposure to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, however, this population of Enterobacteriaceae was substituted by a population with non-integron-associated resistance mechanisms. After trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was discontinued, susceptibility rates to all antibiotics returned to baseline levels.
Ceftibuten versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for oral treatment of febrile urinary tract infection in children. [2009.03] A randomized, open, coordinated multi-center trial compared the bacteriological and clinical efficacy and safety of orally administered ceftibuten and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in children with febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). Children aged 1 month to 12 years presenting with presumptive first-time febrile UTI were eligible for enrolment...
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in children with chronic otitis media: a randomized comparison of costs and effects. [2008.10] OBJECTIVE: To study the cost-effectiveness of a 6- to 12-week course of high-dose oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in children with chronic active otitis media (COM)... CONCLUSION: In children with active COM, direct and indirect costs of a 6- to 12-week course of high-dose oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are modest in the light of its short-term clinical benefit.
A randomized trial of ceftriaxone versus trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole to prevent ventriculoperitoneal shunt infection. [2008.04] BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Shunt infection represents a particularly morbid condition, which can also result in mortality. In order to decrease the high morbidity and mortality rates, prevention is an essential step. The purpose of this study was to compare the prophylactic use of ceftriaxone and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) for the prevention of ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt infection... CONCLUSION: Ceftriaxone and SXT showed similar efficacy in preventing shunt infection. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage before or after VP shunt placement and aqueductal stenosis were independent risk factors for meningitis after VP shunt.
Simultaneous determination of sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim in biological fluids for high-throughput analysis: comparison of HPLC with ultraviolet and tandem mass spectrometric detection. [2008.02.15] The comparison of two methods based on online solid phase extraction-liquid chromatography with UV (SPE-LC-UV) or mass spectrometry detection (SPE-LC-MS/MS) for the simultaneous quantification of sulfamethoxazole (SMZ) and trimethoprim (TMP) is presented.The method with MS detection in comparison with UV detection proved to be more rugged and was successfully applied to pharmacokinetics studies.
Clinical Trials Related to Septra (Trimethoprim / Sulfamethoxazole)
DB289 Versus TMP-SMX for the Treatment of Acute Pneumocystis Jiroveci Pneumonia (PCP) [Suspended]
Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis in Severely Malnourished Children [Not yet recruiting]
This trial aims to test the hypothesis that mortality among Kenyan children with severe
malnutrition following initial stabilisation is due to ongoing vulnerability to infectious
disease, and that co-trimoxazole prophylaxis will reduce mortality.
The objective is to conduct a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of
cotrimoxazole prophylaxis for 6 months among HIV-uninfected children with severe
malnutrition following stabilization. The primary outcome will be survival at one year.
Secondary outcomes are toxicity, survival at two years, growth, hospitalisation and
microbial resistance and ecology.
Cotrimoxazole has striking protective efficacy against mortality among children with HIV,
despite not altering the underlying immune deficiency. It is hypothesised that
co-trimoxazole prophylaxis will have a similar effect in children immunocompromised because
of severe malnutrition. Worldwide, severe malnutrition is commoner than HIV in childhood and
co-trimoxazole is cheap and widely available, making it easily translatable to policy.
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study of 566C80 Versus Septra (Sulfamethoxazole/Trimethoprim) for the Treatment of Pneumocystis Carinii Pneumonia in AIDS Patients [Completed]
To evaluate the effectiveness of atovaquone (566C80) compared to a standard antipneumocystis
agent, (SMX/TMP), for the treatment of mild to moderate Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)
in AIDS patients. To compare the safety of short-term (21 days) treatment with 566C80 and
SMX/TMP in AIDS patients with an acute episode of PCP.
Standard therapies for acute treatment of PCP involve either SMX/TMP or pentamidine
isetionate. Although both treatments are equally effective, side effects prevent completion
of therapy in 11-55 percent of patients.
Impact of Cotrimoxazole Prophylaxis for HIV-Infected Adults on Antifolate Resistance [Completed]
At least three studies in sub-Saharan Africa have demonstrated a decrease in morbidity or
mortality among HIV-infected adults who took daily cotrimoxazole (trimethoprim
sulfamethoxazole) [CTX] prophylaxis. Because of the demonstrated beneficial effect, high
tolerability and low cost of CTX, the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS)
recommends that HIV-infected persons with symptomatic HIV or depressed CD4 counts receive
daily CTX. The effect of this recommendation on subsequent development of antimicrobial
resistance to antifolates among important pathogens needs to be evaluated. The
investigators measured the change in the prevalence of markers of antifolate resistance among
P. falciparum, and the change in the prevalence of CTX resistance among S. pneumoniae, and E.
coli in HIV-infected individuals receiving CTX daily prophylaxis. In addition, the
investigators measured the change in the prevalence of naso-pharyngeal or oro-pharyngeal
carriage of CTX resistant S. pneumoniae among children living in households where an
HIV-infected adult was receiving CTX daily prophylaxis.
Daily Co-Trimoxazole Prophylaxis to Prevent Malaria in Pregnancy [Recruiting]
Malaria is a major contributor of disease burden in Sub-Saharan Africa, and pregnant women
and children are the most vulnerable population. Malaria in pregnancy increases the risks of
abortion, prematurity, maternal anaemia, low birth weight (LBW), perinatal, neonatal and
infant mortality. For prevention and control of malaria in pregnancy, Intermittent Preventive
Treatment (IPT), insecticide treated nets (ITNs) and case management for malaria and anemia
are recommended.
HIV infection in pregnancy increases the risk of malaria, LBW, post-natal mortality and also
of anaemia. In pregnant women, HIV infection decreases the efficacy of IPT with the medicine
sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), which is the only treatment with proven efficacy and safety
in IPT and is recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). Unfortunately, there is a
documented increase of resistance to SP, so cotrimoxazole (CTX) could be an alternative:
many studies in Zambia and Uganda demonstrated that it reduces mortality and morbidity in HIV
infected persons, and CTX prophylaxis significantly improves birth outcomes in
immuno-suppressed HIV women. Unfortunately, there is not yet information on its effectiveness
for preventing placental malaria infection, maternal anaemia and LBW. Thus in this study, we
aim to establish the safety and efficacy of daily CTX in preventing malaria infection during
pregnancy and its consequences, both in HIV infected and non-infected pregnant women. This
information is urgently needed to assist to issue guidelines on IPT in pregnancy.
|
PATIENT REVIEWS / RATINGS / COMMENTSBased on a total of 1 ratings/reviews, Septra has an overall score of 4. The effectiveness score is 8 and the side effect score is 4. The scores are on ten point scale: 10 - best, 1 - worst.
| | Septra review by 48 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Considerably Effective |
| Side effects: | | Severe Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | urinary tract infection |
| Dosage & duration: | | tablet taken daily for the period of 7 days |
| Other conditions: | | none |
| Other drugs taken: | | 0 | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | eliminated urinary tract infection symptoms |
| Side effects: | | mood changes, headaches, |
| Comments: | | I had to finally stop before the end of the dose- I just was not myself. I understand that this drug has been banned in the UK due to the side effects. |
|
|
|
Page last updated: 2009-10-20
|