RESTASIS SUMMARY
RESTASIS (cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion) 0.05% contains a topical immunomodulator with anti-inflammatory effects.
RESTASIS ophthalmic emulsion is indicated to increase tear production in patients whose tear production is presumed to be suppressed due to ocular inflammation associated with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Increased tear production was not seen in patients currently taking topical anti-inflammatory drugs or using punctal plugs.
|
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
Published Studies Related to Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic)
Effect of cyclosporine-A on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. [2011.11] CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that CsA enhanced the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. The osteopenia and the increased osteoclastic activity could be the underlying factors. (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Safety and toxicology of cyclosporine in propylene glycol after 9-month aerosol exposure to beagle dogs. [2011.08] BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine inhalation solution (CIS) delivered via nebulization is under evaluation for the prevention of chronic rejection post-lung transplant. A 300-patient randomized, controlled clinical trial (CYCLIST) is expected to be completed late in 2011. In support of this trial, a chronic inhalation toxicology study in dogs has been completed... CONCLUSION: The study supports the pulmonary and systemic safety of aerosolized CIS at expected lung dose levels/kg of up to 12 times greater than the average dose patients are receiving in the CYCLIST trial.
Prospective, randomized study of the efficacy of systemic cyclosporine in high-risk corneal transplantation. [2011.07] PURPOSE: Immunologic rejection remains a major cause of graft failure in high-risk corneal transplantation. This study was conducted to elucidate the efficacy and safety of systemic cyclosporine (CsA) in high-risk corneal transplantation. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open-labeled clinical trial with a parallel-group study... CONCLUSIONS: No positive effect of systemic CsA administration for suppressing rejection in high-risk corneal transplantation was observed. With a relatively high incidence of systemic side effects, the results suggest that this protocol should not be recommended for corneal transplant recipients, especially those of advanced age. Copyright (c) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Belatacept-based regimens are associated with improved cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors compared with cyclosporine in kidney transplant recipients (BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT studies). [2011.05.15] BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease, the most common cause of death with a functioning graft among kidney transplant recipients, can be exacerbated by immunosuppressive drugs, particularly the calcineurin inhibitors. Belatacept, a selective co-stimulation blocker, may provide a better cardiovascular/metabolic risk profile than current immunosuppressants... CONCLUSIONS: At month 12, belatacept regimens were associated with better cardiovascular and metabolic risk profiles, with lower blood pressure and serum lipids and less NODAT versus CsA. The overall profile of belatacept will continue to be assessed over the 3-year trials.
A randomized controlled study in patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine, with or without G-CSF: a study of the SAA Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. [2011.04.28] We evaluated the role of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in patients with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) treated with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CSA). Between January 2002 and July 2008, 192 patients with newly diagnosed SAA not eligible for transplantation were entered into this multicenter, randomized study to receive ATG/CSA with or without G-CSF...
Clinical Trials Related to Restasis (Cyclosporine Ophthalmic)
Will Restasis Eye Drops Increase Your Chance of Having a Successful Surgery? [Completed]
The purpose of this study is to determine whether reducing inflammation of the surface of the
eye with topical Restasis after glaucoma surgery will improve surgical outcomes and increase
patient comfort.
Long-term Topical Cyclosporine for Atopic Keratoconjunctivitis [Recruiting]
Atopic keratoconjunctivitis (AKC) is a rare type of ocular allergy that is often associated
with eczema. Over time, the complications from this disease process lead to loss of vision
due to continual scarring of the corneal surface. The pathophysiology of AKC has not been
fully elucidated, and the triggers are still unknown.
Corticosteroids are very effective in controlling the acute symptoms of AKC. However, two
thirds of patients managed with a combination of oral antihistamine, topical mast cell
stabilizer, and intermittent topical steroid regimen eventually developed significant
keratopathy and vision loss. Additionally, there are many side effects of corticosteroids,
including local immunosuppression, cataract formation, and increased risk of glaucoma.
Cyclosporin A is an immunomodulator that specifically inhibits T lymphocytes by blocking the
expression of the interleukin-2 receptor. It also blocks the release of inflammatory
mediators from mast cells and eosinophils. Cyclosporin has no known side effects except for
burning upon instillation, and safe to use over long-term . The investigators have
demonstrated that a 0. 05% ophthalmic emulsion of cyclosporine has been shown to be effective
at improving the ocular signs and symptoms of AKC over short-term. However, the long-term
efficacy of cyclosporine A in slowing the natural history of AKC and possible steroid
sparing effects have not been assessed. The investigators hypothesize that cyclosporine A
can be used as a mainstay treatment of AKC to control signs and symptoms over a long period
of time and also prevent the progression of this disease.
Pilot Study of a Homeopathic Therapy in Combination With Cyclosporin (Restasis) in the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease [Recruiting]
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a homeopathic therapy in combination with
cyclosporin (Restasis) is more effective than cyclosporin (Restasis) alone in the treatment
of dry eye disease.
Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI) Versus Steroid Cessation in Renal Transplantation [Recruiting]
This study intends to determine whether steroid withdrawal or calcineurin inhibitor
withdrawal is superior for graft function and graft survival. Secondary endpoints for this
study are: incidence of tumors and cardiovascular events.
The primary objective: To assess if superior graft function (glomerular filtration rate
(GFR) difference of 10 ml/min) will be achieved at 1 year after transplantation in cohorts
of de novo kidney transplant patients treated with Myfortic-everolimus plus steroids
compared to Myfortic-cyclosporine.
Cyclosporine A in Combination With Nab-Paclitaxel in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer [Recruiting]
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the safety of therapy with nab-paclitaxel
and CsA and if the addition of Cyclosporine A (CsA) to nab-paclitaxel helps stop cancer
cells as well as or better than nab-paclitaxel alone.
|
PATIENT REVIEWS / RATINGS / COMMENTSBased on a total of 8 ratings/reviews, Restasis has an overall score of 7.38. The effectiveness score is 7.25 and the side effect score is 8.50. The scores are on ten point scale: 10 - best, 1 - worst. Below are selected reviews: the highest, the median and the lowest rated.
| | Restasis review by medical professional caring for 45 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Highly Effective |
| Side effects: | | Mild Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | dry eyes |
| Dosage & duration: | | 0.05 % twice a day (dosage frequency: 6 months) for the period of 6 months |
| Other conditions: | | blepharitis |
| Other drugs taken: | | none | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | Restasis helps with tear related problems: dryness, reflex overtearing, mucous discharge, irritated eyes, redness and lid swelling. It can irritate at the initial time of therapy but with extra artificial tears this effect is lessoned. |
| Side effects: | | some people get prolonged stinging for 5 to 10 minutes and occasionally increased redness and lid swelling |
| Comments: | | maintainence for chronic dry eye and sometimes helpful for blepharitis as well. |
|
| | Restasis review by 58 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Moderately Effective |
| Side effects: | | No Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | Dry eye |
| Dosage & duration: | | .05% (dosage frequency: 1 drop in each eye 2xday) for the period of 1 year |
| Other conditions: | | none |
| Other drugs taken: | | none | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | After several months using these drops I really could not tell much benefit. However, when I stopped using them for a month the dry eye problem was bad enough to make me realize they had been helping enough to make me realize I was better off with them than without. I continue to use them. |
| Side effects: | | I had no side effects except some slight burning once in a while when I put them in my eye. |
| Comments: | | I was to put one drop in each eye in the morning and again in the evening. |
|
| | Restasis review by 48 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Ineffective |
| Side effects: | | Moderate Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | dry eye |
| Dosage & duration: | | 0.05% twice a day (dosage frequency: 0.05% twice a day) for the period of 3 months |
| Other conditions: | | none |
| Other drugs taken: | | none | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | This did nothing for my dry eyes, which cause me to have blurry vision at times. |
| Side effects: | | Stinging when first applied, lasting approximately 15 minutes, and some redness. |
| Comments: | | This medication is very expensive. Without insurance expect to pay between $270 - $300 for a month supply, depending on which pharmacy you use. Even with insurance it costs me $68 a month. If you read the insert that comes with the drops it states that clinical trials show only 15% of patients show improvement. Had I read that BEFORE I wasted the money on 3 montjs worth of this stuff I wouldn't have even bothered. Waste of money! |
|
|
|
Page last updated: 2011-12-09
|