Prostin E2 Related Published Studies
Well-designed clinical trials related to Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. [2011.07]
Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone cervical ripening and labor induction. [2011.06]
[Comparison of isosorbide dinitrate and dinoprostone for induction of labor in term pregnancy]. [2011.05]
Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. [2011.05]
Sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary with concurrent high-dose oxytocin infusion compared to sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary followed 6 h later by high-dose oxytocin infusion for labor induction in women at term with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. [2011]
Evaluation of patients' satisfaction of cervical ripening using dinoprostone by either intravaginal gel or pessary: an open-label, randomized, prospective study. [2010.09]
Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone. [2010.06]
A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4. [2010.05]
[Comparison of dinoprostone (ovules and gel) to achieve cervical ripening in patients with term pregnancy that occurs with premature membranes rupture]. [2010.02]
Safety and efficacy of misoprostol and dinoprostone as cervical ripening agents. [2010.01]
Dinoprostone vaginal insert versus intravenous oxytocin to reduce postpartum blood loss following vaginal or cesarean delivery. [2010]
Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. [2009.08]
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. [2009.07]
Concurrent dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. [2009.05]
Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial. [2008.10]
Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. [2008.09]
A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin. [2008]
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. [2007.08]
Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. [2007.07]
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. [2007.01.12]
Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: A randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess. [2006.10]
A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. [2006.10]
Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. [2005.04.01]
A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. [2005.04]
Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor. [2005.03]
Well-designed clinical trials possibly related to Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
Cost-effectiveness analysis of prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labour at term. [2011.05]
Prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel or tablets for the induction of labour at term: a randomised controlled trial. [2011.05]
Is transcervical Foley catheter actually slower than prostaglandins in ripening the cervix? A randomized study. [2011.04]
Misoprostol for term labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. [2011.03]
Low dose vaginal misoprostol versus prostaglandin E2 suppository for early uterine evacuation: a randomized clinical trial. [2010.10.01]
Randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes. [2010.03]
[Comparing two Prepidil gel regimens for cervical ripening before induction of labor at term: a randomized trial] [2009.06]
Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial. [2008.11]
Determining dose and endpoints of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert for a phase III trial. [2008.09]
A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) for labor induction. [2007.04]
Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study. [2007.01]
Effects of a single administration of prostaglandin F2alpha, or a combination of prostaglandin F2alpha and prostaglandin E2, or placebo on fertility variables in dairy cows 3-5 weeks post partum, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. [2006.12.21]
Termination of second and early third trimester pregnancy: comparison of 3 methods. [2006.09]
Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial. [2006.03.04]
Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. [2006.03]
Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy. [2006]
A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening. [2005.08]
A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term. [2005.05]
Prostaglandin E vaginal gel to treat dystocia in spontaneous labour: a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. [2005.05]
Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. [2005.04]
Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. [2005.02]
Other research related to Prostin E2 (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
The efficacy of dinoprostone vaginal insert for active management of premature
rupture of membranes at term: a randomized controlled trial. [2012]
Labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: comparison between oxytocin and dinoprostone followed 6 hours later by oxytocin. [2011.07.30]
Oxytocin versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor after previous cesarean section: a retrospective comparative study. [2011.07]
Retention of dinoprostone vaginal insert beyond 12 hours for induction of labor. [2011.06]
A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of
intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening
and labor induction. [2011]
Cardiotocographic abnormalities associated with misoprostol and dinoprostone
cervical ripening and labor induction. [2011]
A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming. [2010.09]
[Clinical study on dinoprostone suppositories 0.8 mm used in cervical ripening and labor induction of women with term pregnancy of premature rupture of the membranes: a multicenter study]. [2010.07]
Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis. [2010.06]
A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal
pessaries for cervical priming. [2010]
Induction of labor: a comparative study of intravaginal misoprostol and
dinoprostone. [2010]
Labor induction with intravaginal misoprostol compared with the dinoprostone
vaginal insert: a systematic review and metaanalysis. [2010]
A randomized controlled trial of 24-hour vaginal dinoprostone pessary compared to
gel for induction of labor in term pregnancies with a Bishop score < or = 4. [2010]
Is there any relation between development of persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern and acutely increased uterine artery vascular flow resistance during dinoprostone use in prolonged pregnancies? [2009]
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. [2008.11.26]
[Oral Misoprostol against Vaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction at Term: A Randomized Comparison.] [2008.10]
A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. [2008.10]
Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial. [2008.10]
Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2). [2008.10]
Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized trial. [2008.06]
Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. [2008]
Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations. [2007.10]
Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized trial. [2007.09.21]
The influence of dinoprostone on uterine cervix ripening and the course of labor. [2007.08]
Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. [2007.05.16]
Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour. [2007.01]
Labor induction in preeclampsia: is misoprostol more effective than dinoprostone? [2007]
[Evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone Propess for labor induction] [2006.06]
[Comparative efficacy of vaginal insert and dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening at term in current practice] [2005.02]
A clinical evaluation of controlled-release dinoprostone for cervical ripening--a review of current evidence in hospital and outpatient settings. [2005]
Other possibly related research studies
Termination of pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean section. [2006.03]
Misoprostol compared with prostaglandin E2 for labour induction in women at term with intact membranes and unfavourable cervix: a systematic review. [2006.12]
Oral misoprostol administration for labor induction. [2006.09]
Vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical ripening and labor induction. [2006.09]
Natural prostaglandins for induction of labor and preinduction cervical ripening. [2006.09]
Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. [2006.04.19]
Abruptio placentae associated with misoprostol use in women with preeclampsia. [2005.09]
A comparison of induction with vaginal prostaglandin E2 versus spontaneous of labor in grand multiparous women. [2005.12]
The benefits and risks of inducing labour in patients with prior caesarean delivery: a systematic review. [2005.08]
Rupture of the uterine scar during term labour: contractility or biochemistry? [2005.01]
Concurrent versus sequential methods for labor induction at term. [2007.02]
Rupture of the scarred uterus. [2007]
Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction. [2007]
Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands. [2007.06]
Preinduction cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 at preterm. [2008]
Misoprostol for induction of labor with a live fetus. [2007.12]
[Pharmacological induction of labour: benefits and risks] [2007.08]
Intracervical prostaglandins for induction of labour. [2008.01.23]
Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes. [2008.04]
Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix. [2008.04]
Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial. [2008.08.25]
Low-dose oral misoprostol for induction of labor: a systematic review. [2009.02]
Practices for prevention, diagnosis and management of postpartum haemorrhage: impact of a regional multifaceted intervention. [2009.09]
Transvaginal sonography of cervical length and Bishop score as predictors of successful induction of term labor: the effect of parity. [2009]
Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes. [2009.04.15]
|
