DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more

Noxafil (Posaconazole) - Description and Clinical Pharmacology

 



NOXAFIL®
(posaconazole) ORAL SUSPENSION

PRODUCT INFORMATION

DESCRIPTION

NOXAFIL® (posaconazole) is a triazole antifungal agent available as a suspension for oral administration.

Posaconazole is designated chemically as 4-[4-[4-[4-[[(3 R,5 R)-5-(2,4-difluorophenyl)tetrahydro-5-(1 H -1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-3-furanyl]methoxy]phenyl]-1-piperazinyl]phenyl]-2-[(1S,2S)-1-ethyl-2-hydroxypropyl]-2,4-dihydro-3 H -1,2,4-triazol-3-one with an empirical formula of C37H42F2N8O4 and a molecular weight of 700.8. The structural formula is:

Posaconazole is a white powder and is insoluble in water.

NOXAFIL® Oral Suspension is a white, cherry-flavored immediate-release suspension containing 40 mg of posaconazole per mL and the following inactive ingredients: polysorbate 80, simethicone, sodium benzoate, sodium citrate dihydrate, citric acid monohydrate, glycerin, xanthan gum, liquid glucose, titanium dioxide, artificial cherry flavor, and purified water.

MICROBIOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

As a triazole antifungal agent, posaconazole blocks the synthesis of ergosterol, a key component of the fungal cell membrane, through the inhibition of the enzyme lanosterol 14α-demethylase and accumulation of methylated sterol precursors.

Activity in vitro and in vivo

Posaconazole has shown in vitro activity against Aspergillus fumigatus and Candida albicans, including Candida albicans isolates from patients refractory to itraconazole or fluconazole or both drugs (see CLINICAL STUDIES and INDICATIONS AND USAGE).

In vitro susceptibility testing was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods (M27-A2, M27-A, M38-A, M38-P). However, correlation between the results of susceptibility studies and clinical outcome has not been established. Posaconazole interpretive criteria/breakpoints have not been established for any fungi.

In immunocompetent and/or immunocompromised mice and rabbits with pulmonary or disseminated infection with A. fumigatus, posaconazole administered prophylactically was effective in prolonging survival and reducing mycological burden. Prophylactic posaconazole also prolonged survival of immunocompetent mice challenged with C. albicans or A. flavus. (See CLINICAL STUDIES.)

Drug Resistance

Clinical isolates of Candida albicans and Candida glabrata with decreases in posaconazole susceptibility were observed in oral swish samples taken during prophylaxis with posaconazole and fluconazole, suggesting a potential for development of resistance. These isolates also showed reduced susceptibility to other azoles, suggesting cross-resistance between azoles. The clinical significance of this finding is not known.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Pharmacokinetics

Absorption

Posaconazole is absorbed with a median Tmax of ~3 to 5 hours. Dose proportional increases in plasma exposure (AUC) to posaconazole were observed following single oral doses from 50 mg to 800 mg and following multiple-dose administration from 50 mg BID to 400 mg BID. No further increases in exposure were observed when the dose was increased from 400 mg BID to 600 mg BID in febrile neutropenic patients or those with refractory invasive fungal infections. Steady-state plasma concentrations are attained at 7 to 10 days following multiple-dose administration.

Following single-dose administration of 200 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are approximately 3 times higher when administered with a nonfat meal and approximately 4 times higher when administered with a high-fat meal (~50 gm fat) relative to the fasted state. Following single-dose administration of 400 mg, the mean AUC and Cmax of posaconazole are approximately 3 times higher when administered with a liquid nutritional supplement (14 gm fat) relative to the fasted state (see TABLE 1). In order to assure attainment of adequate plasma concentrations, it is recommended to administer posaconazole with food or a nutritional supplement. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

TABLE 1: The Mean (%CV) [min-max] Posaconazole Pharmacokinetic Parameters Following Single-Dose Suspension Administration of 200 mg and 400 mg Under Fed and Fasted Conditions
Dose (mg)Cmax (ng/mL)Tmax 1 (hr)AUC(I) (ng∙hr/mL)CL/F (L/hr)t1/2 (hr)
200 mg
fasted (n=20) 2
132 (50)
[45–267]
3.50
[1.5–36The subject with Tmax of 36 hrs had relatively constant plasma levels over 36 hrs (1.7 ng/mL difference between 4 hrs and 36 hrs)]
4179 (31)
[2705–7269]
51 (25)
[28–74]
23.5 (25)
[15.3–33.7]
200 mg
nonfat (n=20)
378 (43)
[131–834]
4 [3–5]10,753 (35)
[4579–17,092]
21 (39)
[12–44]
22.2 (18)
[17.4–28.7]
200 mg
high fat
(54 gm fat) (n=20)
512 (34)
[241–1016]
5 [4–5]15,059 (26)
[10,341–24,476]
14 (24)
[8.2–19]
23.0 (19)
[17.2–33.4]
400 mg
fasted (n=23) 3
121 (75)
[27–366]
4 [2–12]5258 (48)
[2834–9567]
91 (40)
[42–141]
27.3 (26)
[16.8–38.9]
400 mg with
liquid nutritional
supplement
(14 gm fat)(n=23)
355 (43)
[145–720]
5 [4–8]11,295 (40)
[3865–20,592]
43 (56)
[19–103]
26.0 (19)
[18.2–35.0]

1 Median [min–max]
2 n=15 for AUC(I), CL/F and t1/2
3 n=10 for AUC(I), CL/F and t1/2

Distribution

Posaconazole has an apparent volume of distribution of 1774 L, suggesting extensive extravascular distribution and penetration into the body tissues.

Posaconazole is highly protein bound (>98%), predominantly to albumin.

Metabolism

Posaconazole primarily circulates as the parent compound in plasma. Of the circulating metabolites, the majority are glucuronide conjugates formed via UDP glucuronidation (phase 2 enzymes). Posaconazole does not have any major circulating oxidative (CYP450 mediated) metabolites. The excreted metabolites in urine and feces account for ~17% of the administered radiolabeled dose.

Excretion

Posaconazole is eliminated with a mean half-life (t1/2) of 35 hours (range 20 to 66 hours) and a total body clearance (CL/F) of 32 L/hr. Posaconazole is predominantly eliminated in the feces (71% of the radiolabeled dose up to 120 hours) with the major component eliminated as parent drug (66% of the radiolabeled dose). Renal clearance is a minor elimination pathway, with 13% of the radiolabeled dose excreted in urine up to 120 hours (<0.2% of the radiolabeled dose is parent drug).

Summary of Pharmacokinetic Parameters

The mean (%CV) [min–max] posaconazole average steady-state plasma concentrations (Cav) and steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters in patients following administration of 200 mg TID and 400 mg BID of the oral suspension are provided in TABLE 2.

TABLE 2. The Mean (%CV) [min–max] Posaconazole Steady-State Pharmacokinetic Parameters in Patients Following Oral Administration of Posaconazole 200 mg TID and 400 mg BID
DoseOral suspension administrationCav (ng/mL)AUCAUC (0–24 hr) for 200 mg TID and AUC (0–12 hr) for 400 mg BID
(ng∙hr/mL)
CL/F (L/hr)V/F (L)t1/2 (hr)
Note: Cav based on observed data; other pharmacokinetic parameters based on estimates from population pharmacokinetic analyses
200 mg TIDAllogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with graft-versus-host disease
(n=252)
1103 (67)
[21.5–3650]
ND 1 NDNDND
200 mg TIDNeutropenic patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes
(n=215)
583 (65)
[89.7–2200]
15,900 (62)
[4100–56,100]
51.2 (54)
[10.7–146]
2425 (39)
[828–5702]
37.2 (39)
[19.1–148]
400 mg BIDFebrile neutropenic patients or patients with refractory invasive fungal infections, Cav n=24
(n=23)
723 (86)
[6.70–2256]
9093 (80)
[1564–26,794]
76.1 (78)
[14.9–256]
3088 (84)
[407–13,140]
31.7 (42)
[12.4–67.3]

1 Not done

The variability in average plasma posaconazole concentrations in patients was relatively higher than that in healthy subjects.

Exposure Response Relationship

In clinical studies of immunocompromised patients, a wide range of plasma exposures to posaconazole was noted. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of patient data revealed an apparent association between average posaconazole concentrations (Cav) and prophylactic efficacy. A lower Cav may be associated with an increased risk of treatment failure [defined in the study as treatment discontinuation, use of empiric systemic antifungal therapy (SAF), or invasive fungal infections (IFI)].

To enhance the oral absorption of posaconazole and optimize plasma concentrations:

  • Each dose of NOXAFIL® Oral Suspension should be administered with a full meal or liquid nutritional supplement. For patients who can not eat a full meal or tolerate an oral nutritional supplement, alternative antifungal therapy should be considered or patients should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections.
  • Patients who have severe diarrhea or vomiting should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections.
  • Co-administration of drugs that can decrease the plasma concentrations of posaconazole should generally be avoided unless the benefit outweighs the risk. If such drugs are necessary, patients should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections. (See CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Drug Interactions.)

Pharmacokinetics in Special Populations

Gender

The pharmacokinetics of posaconazole are comparable in men and women. No adjustment in the dosage of NOXAFIL® is necessary based on gender.

Race

The pharmacokinetic profile of posaconazole is not significantly affected by race. No adjustment in the dosage of NOXAFIL® is necessary based on race.

Geriatric

The pharmacokinetics of posaconazole are comparable in young and elderly subjects (≥65 years of age). No adjustment in the dosage of NOXAFIL® is necessary in elderly patients (≥65 years of age) based on age.

Pediatric

In the prophylaxis studies, the mean steady-state posaconazole average concentration (Cav) was similar among ten adolescents (13–17 years of age) and adults (≥18 years of age). This is consistent with pharmacokinetic data from another study in which mean steady-state posaconazole Cav from 12 adolescent patients (8–17 years of age) was similar to that in the adults (≥18 years of age).

Hepatic Insufficiency

The pharmacokinetic data in subjects with hepatic impairment was not sufficient to determine if dose adjustment is necessary in patients with hepatic dysfunction. It is recommended that posaconazole be used with caution in patients with hepatic impairment. (See WARNINGS and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

Renal Insufficiency

Following single-dose administration of 400 mg of the oral suspension, there was no significant effect of mild (CLcr: 50–80 mL/min/1.73m2, n=6) and moderate (CLcr: 20–49 mL/min/1.73m2, n=6) renal insufficiency on posaconazole pharmacokinetics; therefore, no dose adjustment is required in patients with mild to moderate renal impairment. In subjects with severe renal insufficiency (CLcr: <20 mL/min/1.73m2), the mean plasma exposure (AUC) was similar to that in patients with normal renal function (CLcr: >80 mL/min/1.73m2); however, the range of the AUC estimates was highly variable (CV=96%) in these subjects with severe renal insufficiency as compared to that in the other renal impairment groups (CV<40%). Due to the variability in exposure, patients with severe renal impairment should be monitored closely for breakthrough fungal infections. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

Electrocardiogram Evaluation

Multiple, time-matched ECGs collected over a 12-hour period were recorded at baseline and steady-state from 173 healthy male and female volunteers (18–85 years of age) administered posaconazole 400 mg BID with a high fat meal. In this pooled analysis, the mean QTc (Fridericia) interval change from baseline was -5 msec following administration of the recommended clinical dose. A decrease in the QTc(F) interval (-3 msec) was also observed in a small number of subjects (n=16) administered placebo. The placebo-adjusted mean maximum QTc(F) interval change from baseline was <0 msec (-8 msec). No healthy subject administered posaconazole had a QTc(F) interval ≥500 msec or an increase ≥60 msec in their QTc(F) interval from baseline. (See PRECAUTIONS.)

Drug Interactions

Effect of Other Drugs on Posaconazole

Posaconazole is primarily metabolized via UDP glucuronidation (phase 2 enzymes) and is a substrate for p-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux. Therefore, inhibitors or inducers of these clearance pathways may affect posaconazole plasma concentrations. A summary of drugs studied clinically, which affect posaconazole concentrations, is provided in TABLE 3. (See PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions).

TABLE 3. Summary of the Effect of Co-administered Drugs on Posaconazole in Healthy Volunteers
Effect on Bioavailability of Posaconazole
Co-administered Drug (Postulated Mechanism of Interaction)Co-administered Drug Dose/SchedulePosaconazole Dose/ScheduleChange in Mean Cmax
(ratio estimate 1; 90% Cl of the ratio estimate)
Change in Mean AUC
(ratio estimate; 90% Cl of the ratio estimate)
Recommendations
Rifabutin
(UDP-G Induction)
300 mg QD × 17 days200 mg (tablets)
QD × 10 days
↓43%
(0.57; 0.43–0.75)
↓49%
(0.51; 0.37–0.71)
Avoid concomitant use unless the benefit outweighs the risks.
Phenytoin
(UDP-G Induction)
200 mg QD × 10 days200 mg (tablets)
QD × 10 days
↓41%
(0.59; 0.44–0.79)
↓50%
(0.50; 0.36–0.71)
Avoid concomitant use unless the benefit outweighs the risks.
Cimetidine
(Alteration of Gastric pH)
400 mg BID × 10 days200 mg (tablets)
QD × 10 days
↓39%
(0.61; 0.53–0.70)
↓39%
(0.61; 0.54–0.69)
Avoid concomitant use unless the benefit outweighs the risks.
Efavirenz
(UDP-G Induction)
400 mg QD × 10 and 20 days400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 10 and 20 days↓45%
(0.55; 0.47–0.66)
↓50%
(0.50; 0.43–0.60)
Avoid concomitant use unless the benefit outweighs the risks.

1 Ratio Estimate is the ratio of co-administered drug plus posaconazole to posaconazole alone for Cmax or AUC.

Co-administration of these drugs listed in TABLE 3 with posaconazole may result in lower plasma concentrations of posaconazole.

No clinically relevant effect on posaconazole bioavailability and/or plasma concentrations was observed when administered with an antacid, glipizide, ritonavir, H2 receptor antagonists other than cimetidine, or proton pump inhibitors; therefore, no posaconazole dose adjustments are required when used concomitantly with these products.

Effect of Posaconazole on Other Drugs

In vitro studies with human hepatic microsomes and clinical studies indicate that posaconazole is an inhibitor primarily of CYP3A4. A clinical study in healthy volunteers also indicates that posaconazole is a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor as evidenced by a >5-fold increase in midazolam AUC. Therefore, plasma concentrations of drugs predominantly metabolized by CYP3A4 may be increased by posaconazole. A summary of the drugs studied clinically, for which plasma concentrations were affected by posaconazole, is provided in TABLE 4. (See CONTRAINDICATIONS, WARNINGS, and PRECAUTIONS, Drug Interactions.)

TABLE 4. Summary of the Effect of Posaconazole on Co-administered Drugs in Healthy Volunteers and Patients
Effect on Bioavailability of Co-administered Drugs
Co-administered Drug (Postulated Mechanism of Interaction)Co-administered Drug Dose/SchedulePosaconazole Dose/ScheduleChange in Mean Cmax
(ratio estimate 1; 90% Cl of the ratio estimate)
Change in Mean AUC
(ratio estimate; 90% Cl of the ratio estimate)
Recommendations
Sirolimus
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
2 mg single oral dose400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 16 days↑ 572%
(6.72; 5.62–8.03)
↑ 788%
(8.88; 7.26–10.9
Coadministration of posaconazole with sirolimus is contraindicated (see CONTRAINDICATIONS).
Cyclosporine
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
Stable maintenance dose in heart transplant recipients200 mg (tablets)
QD × 10 days
↑ cyclosporine whole blood trough concentrations

Cyclosporine dose reductions of up to 29% were required
At initiation of posaconazole treatment, reduce the cyclosporine dose to approximately three-fourths of the original dose.

Frequent monitoring of cyclosporine whole blood trough concentrations should be performed during and at discontinuation of posaconazole treatment and the cyclosporine dose adjusted accordingly.
Tacrolimus
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
0.05 mg/kg single oral dose400 mg (oral suspension)
BID × 7 days
↑ 121%
(2.21; 2.01–2.42)
↑ 358%
(4.58; 4.03–5.19)
At initiation of posaconazole treatment, reduce the tacrolimus dose to approximately one-third of the original dose.

Frequent monitoring of tacrolimus whole blood trough concentrations should be performed during and at discontinuation of posaconazole treatment and the tacrolimus dose adjusted accordingly.
Rifabutin
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
300 mg QD × 17 days200 mg
(tablets)
QD × 10 days
↑ 31%
(1.31; 1.10–1.57)
↑ 72%
(1.72; 1.51–1.95)
Avoid concomitant use unless the benefit outweighs the risks. If the drugs are co-administered, frequent monitoring of rifabutin adverse effects (eg, uveitis, leukopenia) should be performed.
Midazolam
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
Single 30 min IV infusion of 0.05 mg/kg200 mg
(tablets)
QD × 10 days
NANA: Not applicable if administered as an IV↑ 83%
(1.83;
1.57–2.14)
Frequent monitoring of adverse effects of benzodiazepines metabolized by CYP3A4 should be performed and dose reduction of these benzodiazepines should be considered during co-administration with posaconazole.
     
0.4 mg single IV dose 2 200 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 30%
(1.3; 1.13–1.48)
↑ 362%
(4.62; 4.02–5.3)
     
2 mg single oral dose200 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 126%
(2.26; 2.02–2.53)
↑ 362%
(4.59; 4.12–5.11)
     
0.4 mg single IV dose400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 62%
(1.62; 1.41–1.86)
↑ 524%
(6.24; 5.43–7.16)
Phenytoin
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
200 mg QD PO × 10 days200 mg
(tablets)
QD × 10 days
↑ 16%
(1.16; 0.85–1.57)
↑ 16%
(1.16; 0.84–1.59)
Frequent monitoring of phenytoin concentrations should be performed while co-administered with posaconazole and dose reduction of phenytoin should be considered.
Ritonavir
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
100 mg QD × 14 days400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 49%
(1.49; 1.04–2.15)
↑ 80%
(1.8; 1.39–2.31)
Frequent monitoring of adverse effects and toxicity of ritonavir should be performed during co-administration with posaconazole.
Atazanavir
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
300 mg QD × 14 days400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 155%
(2.55; 1.89–3.45)
↑ 268%
(3.68; 2.89–4.70)
Frequent monitoring of adverse effects and toxicity of Atazanavir should be performed during co-administration with posaconazole.
     
Atazanavir/ritonavir boosted regimen
(Inhibition of CYP3A4 by posaconazole)
300 mg/100 mg QD × 14 days 400 mg (oral suspension) BID × 7 days↑ 53%
(1.53; 1.13–2.07)
↑ 146%
(2.46; 1.93–3.13)

1 Ratio Estimate is the ratio of co-administered drug plus posaconazole to co-administered drug alone for Cmax or AUC.
2 The mean terminal half-life of midazolam was increased from 3 hours to 8 to 10 hours during co-administration with posaconazole.

Additional clinical studies demonstrated that no clinically significant effects on zidovudine, lamivudine, ritonavir, indinavir, or caffeine were observed when administered with posaconazole 200 mg QD; therefore, no dose adjustments are required for these co-administered drugs when co-administered with posaconazole 200 mg QD.

Posaconazole administration with glipizide does not require a dose adjustment in either drug; however, glucose concentrations decreased in some healthy volunteers administered the combination. Therefore, glucose concentrations should be monitored in accordance with the current standard of care for patients with diabetes when posaconazole is co-administered with glipizide.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Prophylaxis of Aspergillus and Candida Infections

Two randomized, controlled studies were conducted using posaconazole as prophylaxis for the prevention of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) among patients at high risk due to severely compromised immune systems.

The first study (Study 1) was a randomized, double-blind trial that compared posaconazole oral suspension (200 mg three times a day) with fluconazole capsules (400 mg once daily) as prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients with Graft versus Host Disease (GVHD). Efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy. (Patients may have met more than one of these criteria.) Study 1 assessed all patients while on study therapy plus 7 days and at 16 weeks post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the two treatment groups (80 days, posaconazole; 77 days, fluconazole). TABLE 5 contains the results from Study 1.

TABLE 5. Results from Blinded Clinical Study 1 in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients with Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT) and Graft-vs-Host Disease (GVHD)
Posaconazole
n=301
Fluconazole
n=299
On therapy plus 7 days
Clinical Failure 1 50 (17%)55 (18%)
   Failure due to:
    Proven/Probable IFI7 (2%)22 (7%)
      (Aspergillus)3 (1%)17 (6%)
      (Candida)1 (<1%)3 (1%)
      (Other)3 (1%)2 (1%)
    All Deaths22 (7%)24 (8%)
      Proven/probable
      fungal infection
      prior to death
2 (<1%)6 (2%)
    SAF 2 27 (9%)25 (8%)
Through 16 weeks
Clinical Failure , 3 99 (33%)110 (37%)
   Failure due to:
    Proven/Probable IFI16 (5%)27 (9%)
      (Aspergillus)7 (2%)21 (7%)
      (Candida)4 (1%)4 (1%)
      (Other)5 (2%)2 (1%)
    All Deaths58 (19%)59 (20%)
      Proven/probable
      fungal infection
      prior to death
10 (3%)16 (5%)
    SAF26 (9%)30 (10%)
    Event free lost to follow-upPatients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 112 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint. These patients were considered failures.24 (8%)30 (10%)

1 Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure.
2 Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage >4 consecutive days).
3 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole) = (-11.5%, +3.7%)

The second study (Study 2) was a randomized, open-label study that compared posaconazole oral suspension (200 mg three times a day) with fluconazole suspension (400 mg once daily) or itraconazole oral solution (200 mg twice a day) as prophylaxis against IFIs in neutropenic patients who were receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndromes. As in Study 1, efficacy of prophylaxis was evaluated using a composite endpoint of proven/probable IFIs, death, or treatment with systemic antifungal therapy. (Patients might have met more than one of these criteria.) Study 2 assessed patients while on treatment plus 7 days and 100 days post-randomization. The mean duration of therapy was comparable between the two treatment groups (29 days, posaconazole; 25 days, fluconazole or itraconazole). TABLE 6 contains the results from Study 2.

TABLE 6. Results from Open-Label Clinical Study 2 in Prophylaxis of IFI in All Randomized Patients with Hematologic Malignancy and Prolonged Neutropenia
Posaconazole
n=304
Fluconazole/Itraconazole
n=298
On therapy plus 7 days
Clinical Failure 95% confidence interval (posaconazole-fluconazole/itraconazole) = (-22.9%, -7.8%)., 1 82 (27%)126 (42%)
   Failure due to:
    Proven/Probable IFI7 (2%)25 (8%)
      (Aspergillus)2 (1%)20 (7%)
      (Candida)3 (1%)2 (1%)
      (Other)2 (1%)3 (1%)
    All Deaths17 (6%)25 (8%)
      Proven/probable
      fungal infection
      prior to death
1 (<1%)2 (1%)
    SAF 2 67 (22%)98 (33%)
Through 100 days post-randomization
Clinical Failure 158 (52%)191 (64%)
   Failure due to:
    Proven/Probable IFI14 (5%)33 (11%)
      (Aspergillus)2 (1%)26 (9%)
      (Candida)10 (3%)4 (1%)
      (Other)2 (1%)3 (1%)
    All Deaths44 (14%)64 (21%)
      Proven/probable
      fungal infection
      prior to death
2 (1%)16 (5%)
    SAF98 (32%)125 (42%)
    Event free lost to follow-upPatients who are lost to follow-up (not observed for 100 days), and who did not meet another clinical failure endpoint. These patients were considered failures.34 (11%)24 (8%)

1 Patients may have met more than one criterion defining failure.
2 Use of systemic antifungal therapy (SAF) criterion is based on protocol definitions (empiric/IFI usage >3 consecutive days).

In summary, two clinical studies of prophylaxis were conducted. As seen in the accompanying tables (TABLES 5 and 6), clinical failure represented a composite endpoint of breakthrough IFI, mortality and use of systemic antifungal therapy. In Study 1 (TABLE 5), the clinical failure rate of posaconazole (33%) was similar to fluconazole (37%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -11.5% to 3.7%) while in Study 2 (TABLE 6) clinical failure was lower for patients treated with posaconazole (27%) when compared to patients treated with fluconazole or itraconazole (42%), (95% CI for the difference posaconazole–comparator -22.9% to -7.8%).

All cause mortality was similar at 16 weeks for both treatment arms in Study 1 [POS 58/301 (19%) vs FLU 59/299 (20%)]; all cause mortality was lower at 100 days for posaconazole-treated patients in Study 2 [POS 44/304 (14%) vs FLU/ITZ 64/298 (21%)]. Both studies demonstrated substantially fewer breakthrough infections caused by Aspergillus species in patients receiving posaconazole prophylaxis when compared to patients receiving fluconazole or itraconazole.

For information on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of patient data see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Exposure Response Relationship.

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis (OPC)

Study 3 was a randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded study in HIV-infected patients with oropharyngeal candidiasis. Patients were treated with posaconazole or fluconazole oral suspension (both posaconazole and fluconazole were given as follows: 100 mg twice a day for 1 day followed by 100 mg once a day for 13 days).

Clinical and mycological outcomes were assessed after 14 days of treatment and at 4 weeks after the end of treatment. Patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had a positive oral swish culture of Candida species at baseline were included in the analyses ( TABLE 7). The majority of the subjects had C. albicans as the baseline pathogen.

Clinical success at Day 14 (complete or partial resolution of all ulcers and/or plaques and symptoms) and clinical relapse rates (recurrence of signs or symptoms after initial cure or improvement) 4 weeks after the end of treatment were similar between the treatment arms (TABLE 7).

Mycologic eradication rates (absence of colony forming units in quantitative culture at the end of therapy, day 14), as well as mycologic relapse rates (4 weeks after the end of treatment) were also similar between the treatment arms (see TABLE 7).

TABLE 7. Clinical Success, Mycological Eradication, and Relapse Rates in Oropharyngeal Candidiasis
PosaconazoleFluconazole
Clinical Success at End of Therapy (Day 14)155/169 (91.7%)148/160 (92.5%)
Clinical Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Therapy)45/155 (29.0%)52/148 (35.1%)
Mycological Eradication (absence of CFU) at End of Therapy (Day 14)88/169 (52.1%)80/160 (50.0%)
Mycological Relapse (4 Weeks after End of Treatment)49/88 (55.6%)51/80 (63.7%)

Mycologic response rates, using a criterion for success as a post-treatment quantitative culture with ≤20 colony forming units (CFU/mL) were also similar between the two groups (posaconazole 68.0%, fluconazole 68.1%). The clinical significance of this finding is unknown.

Treatment of Oropharyngeal Candidiasis Refractory to Treatment with Fluconazole or Itraconazole

Study 4 was a non-comparative study of posaconazole oral suspension in HIV-infected subjects with OPC that was refractory to treatment with fluconazole or itraconazole. An episode of OPC was considered refractory if there was failure to improve or worsening of OPC after a standard course of therapy with fluconazole ≥ 100 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days or itraconazole 200 mg/day for at least 10 consecutive days and treatment with either fluconazole or itraconazole had not been discontinued for more than 14 days prior to treatment with posaconazole. Of the 199 subjects enrolled in this study, eighty-nine subjects met these strict criteria for refractory infection.

Forty-five subjects with refractory OPC were treated with posaconazole 400 mg BID for three days, followed by 400 mg QD for 25 days with an option for further treatment during a 3-month maintenance period. Following a dosing amendment, a further 44 subjects were treated with posaconazole 400 mg BID for twenty-eight days. The efficacy of posaconazole was assessed by the clinical success (cure or improvement) rate after 4 weeks of treatment. The clinical success rate was 74.2% (66/89). The clinical success rates for both the original and the amended dosing regimens were similar (73.3% and 75.0%, respectively).

For information on a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of patient data see CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, Exposure Response Relationship.

Page last updated: 2008-06-18

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross
We comply with
HONcode standard.
Verify here.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2009