MEFOXIN SUMMARY
Directions for Use of Galaxy® Containers (PL 2040 Plastic)
MEFOXIN (Cefoxitin for Injection) is a semi-synthetic, broad-spectrum cepha antibiotic sealed under nitrogen for intravenous administration. It is derived from cephamycin C, which is produced by
Streptomyces lactamdurans.
MEFOXIN is indicated for the following:
Treatment
MEFOXIN is indicated for the treatment of serious infections caused by susceptible strains of the designated microorganisms in the diseases listed below.
- Lower respiratory tract infections, including pneumonia and lung abscess, caused by
Streptococcus pneumoniae,
other streptococci (excluding enterococci, e.g., Enterococcus faecalis
[formerly
Streptococcus faecalis
]),
Staphylococcus aureus
(including penicillinase-producing strains), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
species,
Haemophilus influenzae,
and
Bacteroides
species.
- Urinary tract infections caused by
Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
species,
Proteus mirabilis, Morganella morganii, Proteus vulgaris
and
Providencia
species (including
P. rettgeri).
- Intra-abdominal infections, including peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess, caused by
Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
species,
Bacteroides
species including
Bacteroides fragilis, and
Clostridium
species.
- Gynecological infections, including endometritis, pelvic cellulitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease caused by
Escherichia coli, Neisseria gonorrhoeae
(including penicillinase-producing strains), Bacteroides
species including
B. fragilis,
Clostridium
species,
Peptococcus niger,
Peptostreptococcus
species, and
Streptococcus agalactiae. MEFOXIN, like cephalosporins, has no activity against
Chlamydia trachomatis.
Therefore, when MEFOXIN is used in the treatment of patients with pelvic inflammatory disease and
C. trachomatis
is one of the suspected pathogens, appropriate anti-chlamydial coverage should be added.
- Septicemia caused by
Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus
(including penicillinase-producing strains), Escherichia coli, Klebsiella
species, and
Bacteroides
species including
B. fragilis.
- Bone and joint infections caused by
Staphylococcus aureus
(including penicillinase-producing strains).
- Skin and skin structure infections caused by
Staphylococcus aureus
(including penicillinase-producing strains), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Streptococcus pyogenes
and other streptococci (excluding enterococci e.g., Enterococcus faecalis
[formerly
Streptococcus faecalis
]),
Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Klebsiella
species,
Bacteroides
species including
B. fragilis,
Clostridium
species,
Peptococcus niger,
and
Peptostreptococcus
species.
Appropriate culture and susceptibility studies should be performed to determine the susceptibility of the causative organisms to MEFOXIN. Therapy may be started while awaiting the results of these studies.
In randomized comparative studies, MEFOXIN and cephalothin were comparably safe and effective in the management of infections caused by gram-positive cocci and gram-negative rods susceptible to the cephalosporins. MEFOXIN has a high degree of stability in the presence of bacterial beta-lactamases, both penicillinases and cephalosporinases.
Many infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic gram-negative bacteria resistant to some cephalosporins respond to MEFOXIN. Similarly, many infections caused by aerobic and anaerobic bacteria resistant to some penicillin antibiotics (ampicillin, carbenicillin, penicillin G) respond to treatment with MEFOXIN. Many infections caused by mixtures of susceptible aerobic and anaerobic bacteria respond to treatment with MEFOXIN.
Prevention
MEFOXIN is indicated for the prophylaxis of infection in patients undergoing uncontaminated gastrointestinal surgery, vaginal hysterectomy, abdominal hysterectomy, or cesarean section.
If there are signs of infection, specimens for culture should be obtained for identification of the causative organism so that appropriate treatment may be instituted.
To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of MEFOXIN and other antibacterial drugs, MEFOXIN should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.
|
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
Published Studies Related to Mefoxin (Cefoxitin)
Failure of cefoxitin and doxycycline to eradicate endometrial Mycoplasma genitalium and the consequence for clinical cure of pelvic inflammatory disease. [2008.10] OBJECTIVES: As Mycoplasma genitalium is associated with pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), we examined the efficacy of a commonly used PID antimicrobial in treating M genitalium upper genital tract infection... CONCLUSIONS: M genitalium is associated with endometritis and short-term PID treatment failure. Cefoxitin and doxycycline, a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended PID treatment regimen, is ineffective for the treatment of M genitalium upper genital tract infection.
Ampicillin/sulbactam and cefoxitin in the treatment of cutaneous and other soft-tissue abscesses in patients with or without histories of injection drug abuse. [2000.08] A randomized, double-blind trial compared the clinical and bacteriologic efficacy of ampicillin/sulbactam (2 g/1 g) and cefoxitin (2 g) administered intravenously every 6 h to patients with (n=49) or without (n=47) histories of injection drug abuse who presented with cutaneous or other soft-tissue infections...
The effects of sodium ampicillin, sodium cefazolin, and sodium cefoxitin on blood pressures and heart rates in healthy, anesthetized dogs. [2000.03] This study determined the effects of intravenous ampicillin, cefazolin, and cefoxitin on blood pressures and heart rates in healthy, anesthetized dogs. Forty dogs were each randomly assigned to a control, ampicillin, cefazolin, or cefoxitin group...
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of ampicillin-sulbactam versus cefoxitin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections. [1998.01] We conducted a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis of a prospective, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial comparing the beta-lactamase inhibitor combination ampicillin-sulbactam (96 patients) and the cephalosporin cefoxitin (101) in the treatment of intraabdominal infections...
[Prospective and comparative study of cefoxitin and ceftizoxime in appendicitis surgery] [1997.09] OBJECTIVE: Acute appendicitis is the most common acute surgical disease in childhood and it still presents frequent septic complications. This prospective and randomized study compares the efficacy of two cephalosporins (cefoxitin and ceftizoxime) in terms of clinical response, in vitro activity and characteristics of use in clinical practice... CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that ceftizoxime is as effective as cefoxitin and can be surely employed in the treatment of acute appendicitis in children. Its addition, its longer half-life simplifies its use in clinical practice.
Clinical Trials Related to Mefoxin (Cefoxitin)
Effect of Genetic Variation in the Transporter, OAT3, on the Renal Secretion of Cefotaxime [Recruiting]
In the proposed study, we plan to use a genotype to phenotype strategy to study the role of
the organic anion transporter, OAT3, in drug response. More specifically we will examine
the contribution of OAT3 to the renal clearance of anionic drugs such as cefotaxime by
studying individuals with a non-functional (or poorly-functional) variant of OAT3.
Tissue Penetration of Antibiotics in Obesity [Recruiting]
Study of Conservative Versus Surgical Treatment of Appendicitis [Active, not recruiting]
The purpose of this study is to determine if antibiotic treatment of appendicitis is an
option compared to surgery. Our hypothesis is that a majority of patients with appendicitis
can heal without surgery and that there are several advantages with antibiotic treatment
related to time to recover, complications and economical aspects.
Antibiotics for Postpartum Third and Fourth Degree Perineal Tear Repairs [Active, not recruiting]
This study is undertaken to find out whether prophylactic antibiotics can decrease the
infection rate in third and fourth degree perineal tear repairs done in the immediate
postpartum period.
Albumin Administration in Patients With Cirrhosis and Infections Unrelated to Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis [Recruiting]
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) present in cirrhotic patients induces severe
circulatory dysfunction, which results in renal failure in up to 30% of the patients. Renal
failure is an important prognostic marker, representing the major predictive factor of
in-hospital mortality.
Recent studies have shown that plasma volume expansion with albumin associated with
cefotaxime in patients with SBP is more efficient to prevent renal failure than cefotaxime
treatment alone. The in-hospital and three-month mortality rates, furthermore, were
significantly lower in the group treated with albumin.
It is not known if other bacterial infections unrelated to SBP represent a risk factor for
the development of renal failure among cirrhotic patients. The researcher's group has
recently performed a study to evaluate the incidence, characteristics and outcome, of renal
failure in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections unrelated to SBP associated with
the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (Terra, unpublished results). Among a total of
106 patients, 29 (27%) presented renal failure during the course of infection. Renal failure
was characterized by intense renal vasoconstriction (intrarenal resistive index of 0. 83 +/-
0. 09, measured by Doppler ultrasound), reduction of mean arterial pressure and an important
activation of endogenous vasoconstriction systems. The three-month survival probability of
patients with infection and renal failure was 34 %, much lower than that of patients with
infection but not presenting renal failure (87%, p<0. 0001). These results suggest that the
development of renal failure in patients with cirrhosis and bacterial infections different
from SBP, associated with signs of a systemic inflammatory response, is very frequent and
results in a very poor prognosis. Taken as a whole, these data strongly indicate the need to
consider these patients as candidates for liver transplantation and to plan strategies for
its prevention.
The objective of this project, therefore, is to evaluate if the plasma volume expansion with
albumin, associated with conventional antibiotic therapy, can prevent the development of
renal failure and increase survival rates in cirrhotic patients with bacterial infections
unrelated to spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
|
|
|
|
Page last updated: 2008-11-03
|