LO OVRAL SUMMARY
21 white LO/OVRAL tablets, each containing 0.3 mg of norgestrel ( dl
-13-beta-ethyl-17-alpha-ethinyl-17-beta-hydroxygon-4-en-3-one), a totally synthetic progestogen, and 0.03 mg of ethinyl estradiol (19-nor-17(alpha)-pregna-1,3,5 (10)-trien-20-yne-3,17-diol), and 7 pink inert tablets.
Oral contraceptives are indicated for the prevention of pregnancy in women who elect to use this product as a method of contraception.
Media Articles Related to LO Ovral (Norgestrel / Ethinyl Estradiol)
Contraception Safety Program for Acne Drug Failing in Canada
Source: MedicineNet isotretinoin Specialty [2016.04.26]
Title: Contraception Safety Program for Acne Drug Failing in Canada
Category: Health News
Created: 4/25/2016 12:00:00 AM
Last Editorial Review: 4/26/2016 12:00:00 AM
At Some Catholic Hospitals, Taboos Extend to Referrals
Source: MedPage Today OB/Gyn [2016.08.17]
(MedPage Today) -- Docs forbidden to make referrals for contraception, abortion
Published Studies Related to LO Ovral (Norgestrel / Ethinyl Estradiol)
A 1-year randomized study to evaluate the effects of a dose reduction in oral contraceptives on lipids and carbohydrate metabolism: 20 microg ethinyl estradiol combined with 100 microg levonorgestrel. [2005.02]
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact on lipid and carbohydrate variables of a combined one-third ethinyl estradiol (EE)/levonorgestrel (LNG) dose reduction in oral contraceptives... CONCLUSION: Similar effects on the lipid and carbohydrate profiles were found for both preparations. The balanced one-third EE dose reduction in this new oral contraceptive caused slightly lower, but insignificant, changes in the lipid and carbohydrate variables compared with the reference treatment.
Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel: a randomized trial. [2005.02]
BACKGROUND: This trial was conducted to compare cycle control with vaginal ring a combined contraceptive vaginal ring, and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) delivering 30 mug ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 mug levonorgestrel... CONCLUSIONS: Cycle control with vaginal ring was excellent and superior to that of a COC containing 30 mug EE.
A comparative study of monophasic oral contraceptives containing either drospirenone 3 mg or levonorgestrel 150 microg on premenstrual symptoms. [2005.01]
This open-label randomized study compared the effects of two combined oral contraceptives (OCs) containing 3 mg drospirenone (DRSP)/30 microg ethinyl estradiol (EE) with 150 microg levonorgestrel (LNG)/30 microg EE on the prevalence and changes from baseline of premenstrual symptoms after six cycles...
Ovarian follicular development is initiated during the hormone-free interval of oral contraceptive use. [2004.11]
We evaluated ovarian follicular development in women during compliant use of oral contraceptives (OC). Thirty-six healthy women received: [35 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/180 microg norgestimate (7), 215 microg norgestimate (7), 250 microg norgestimate (7)]; [30 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/150 microg desogestrel (21)]; or [20 microg ethinyl estradiol (21)/100 microg levonorgestrel (21)] for 3 consecutive 28-day cycles...
Cycle control, quality of life and acne with two low-dose oral contraceptives containing 20 microg ethinylestradiol. [2004.06]
OBJECTIVES: Poor cycle control and tolerability can be reasons for irregular pill intake. This study compared the tolerability of two low-dose oral contraceptives and their effect on cycle control... CONCLUSIONS: 20EE/DSG provided better cycle control than 20EE/LNG with less treatment discontinuation due to unacceptable bleeding. There were no apparent differences between the two groups regarding tolerability and quality of life. There was less acne with 20EE/DSG. Copyright 2004 Elsevier Inc.
PATIENT REVIEWS / RATINGS / COMMENTS
Based on a total of 1 ratings/reviews, LO Ovral has an overall score of 9. The effectiveness score is 10 and the side effect score is 8. The scores are on ten point scale: 10 - best, 1 - worst.
LO Ovral review by 3 year old female patient
|Overall rating:|| || |
|Effectiveness:|| || Highly Effective|
|Side effects:|| || Mild Side Effects|
|Condition / reason:|| || acne and contraception|
|Dosage & duration:|| || standard 30 mcg (dosage frequency: every day) for the period of 8 years|
|Other conditions:|| || hirsutism|
|Other drugs taken:|| || spironolactone|
|Benefits:|| || Within days, the acne disappeared. When taken continuously for 3-5 months at a time, the acne never reappeared and the hirsutism decreased substantially. We then added laser hair removal and stopped the spironolactone.|
|Side effects:|| || Spironolactone caused occasional leg cramping. The Lo-ovral caused some water retention.|
|Comments:|| || Spironolactone was taken 50 mg a day and then increased after 3 months to 100 mg twice a day. The Lo-ovral was taken each day. The laser hair removal was every 6 weeks. The acne was completely under control. When the OCP was stopped, the acne returned.|
Page last updated: 2016-08-17