DrugLib.com — Drug Information Portal

Rx drug information, pharmaceutical research, clinical trials, news, and more

Forteo (Teriparatide) - Description and Clinical Pharmacology

 
 



DESCRIPTION

FORTEO® [teriparatide (rDNA origin) injection] contains recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–34), [rhPTH(1–34)], which has an identical sequence to the 34 N–terminal amino acids (the biologically active region) of the 84–amino acid human parathyroid hormone.

Teriparatide has a molecular weight of 4117.8 daltons and its amino acid sequence is shown below:

Teriparatide (rDNA origin) is manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company using a strain of Escherichia coli modified by recombinant DNA technology. FORTEO is supplied as a sterile, colorless, clear, isotonic solution in a glass cartridge which is pre–assembled into a disposable pen device for subcutaneous injection. Each prefilled delivery device is filled with 3.3 mL to deliver 3 mL. Each mL contains 250 mcg teriparatide (corrected for acetate, chloride, and water content), 0.41 mg glacial acetic acid, 0.1 mg sodium acetate (anhydrous), 45.4 mg mannitol, 3 mg Metacresol, and Water for Injection. In addition, hydrochloric acid solution 10% and/or sodium hydroxide solution 10% may have been added to adjust the product to pH 4.

Each cartridge pre–assembled into a pen device delivers 20 mcg of teriparatide per dose each day for up to 28 days.

See accompanying User Manual: Instructions for Use.

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Mechanism of Action

Endogenous 84–amino–acid parathyroid hormone (PTH) is the primary regulator of calcium and phosphate metabolism in bone and kidney. Physiological actions of PTH include regulation of bone metabolism, renal tubular reabsorption of calcium and phosphate, and intestinal calcium absorption. The biological actions of PTH and teriparatide are mediated through binding to specific high-affinity cell–surface receptors. Teriparatide and the 34 N–terminal amino acids of PTH bind to these receptors with the same affinity and have the same physiological actions on bone and kidney. Teriparatide is not expected to accumulate in bone or other tissues.

The skeletal effects of teriparatide depend upon the pattern of systemic exposure. Once–daily administration of teriparatide stimulates new bone formation on trabecular and cortical (periosteal and/or endosteal) bone surfaces by preferential stimulation of osteoblastic activity over osteoclastic activity. In monkey studies, teriparatide improved trabecular microarchitecture and increased bone mass and strength by stimulating new bone formation in both cancellous and cortical bone. In humans, the anabolic effects of teriparatide are manifest as an increase in skeletal mass, an increase in markers of bone formation and resorption, and an increase in bone strength. By contrast, continuous excess of endogenous PTH, as occurs in hyperparathyroidism, may be detrimental to the skeleton because bone resorption may be stimulated more than bone formation.

Human Pharmacokinetics

Teriparatide is extensively absorbed after subcutaneous injection; the absolute bioavailability is approximately 95% based on pooled data from 20-, 40-, and 80–mcg doses. The rates of absorption and elimination are rapid. The peptide reaches peak serum concentrations about 30 minutes after subcutaneous injection of a 20–mcg dose and declines to non–quantifiable concentrations within 3 hours.

Systemic clearance of teriparatide (approximately 62 L/hr in women and 94 L/hr in men) exceeds the rate of normal liver plasma flow, consistent with both hepatic and extra–hepatic clearance. Volume of distribution, following intravenous injection, is approximately 0.12 L/kg. Intersubject variability in systemic clearance and volume of distribution is 25% to 50%. The half–life of teriparatide in serum is 5 minutes when administered by intravenous injection and approximately 1 hour when administered by subcutaneous injection. The longer half–life following subcutaneous administration reflects the time required for absorption from the injection site.

No metabolism or excretion studies have been performed with teriparatide. However, the mechanisms of metabolism and elimination of PTH(1–34) and intact PTH have been extensively described in published literature. Peripheral metabolism of PTH is believed to occur by non–specific enzymatic mechanisms in the liver followed by excretion via the kidneys.

Special Populations

Pediatric

Pharmacokinetic data in pediatric patients are not available (see WARNINGS).

Geriatric

No age–related differences in teriparatide pharmacokinetics were detected (range 31 to 85 years).

Gender

Although systemic exposure to teriparatide was approximately 20% to 30% lower in men than women, the recommended dose for both genders is 20 mcg/day.

Race

The populations included in the pharmacokinetic analyses were 98.5% Caucasian. The influence of race has not been determined.

Renal insufficiency

No pharmacokinetic differences were identified in 11 patients with mild or moderate renal insufficiency [creatinine clearance (CrCl) 30 to 72 mL/min] administered a single dose of teriparatide. In 5 patients with severe renal insufficiency (CrCl<30 mL/min), the AUC and T1/2 of teriparatide were increased by 73% and 77%, respectively. Maximum serum concentration of teriparatide was not increased. No studies have been performed in patients undergoing dialysis for chronic renal failure (see PRECAUTIONS).

Heart failure

No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic, blood pressure, or pulse rate differences were identified in 13 patients with stable New York Heart Association Class I to III heart failure after the administration of two 20–mcg doses of teriparatide.

Hepatic insufficiency

Non–specific proteolytic enzymes in the liver (possibly Kupffer cells) cleave PTH(1–34) and PTH(1–84) into fragments that are cleared from the circulation mainly by the kidney. No studies have been performed in patients with hepatic impairment.

Drug Interactions

Hydrochlorothiazide — In a study of 20 healthy people, the coadministration of hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg with teriparatide did not affect the serum calcium response to teriparatide 40 mcg. The 24–hour urine excretion of calcium was reduced by a clinically unimportant amount (15%). The effect of coadministration of a higher dose of hydrochlorothiazide with teriparatide on serum calcium levels has not been studied.

Furosemide — In a study of 9 healthy people and 17 patients with mild, moderate, or severe renal insufficiency (CrCl 13 to 72 mL/min), coadministration of intravenous furosemide (20 to 100 mg) with teriparatide 40 mcg resulted in small increases in the serum calcium (2%) and 24–hour urine calcium (37%) responses to teriparatide that did not appear to be clinically important.

Human Pharmacodynamics

Effects on mineral metabolism

Teriparatide affects calcium and phosphorus metabolism in a pattern consistent with the known actions of endogenous PTH (eg, increases serum calcium and decreases serum phosphorus).

Serum calcium concentrations

When teriparatide 20 mcg is administered once daily, the serum calcium concentration increases transiently, beginning approximately 2 hours after dosing and reaching a maximum concentration between 4 and 6 hours (median increase, 0.4 mg/dL). The serum calcium concentration begins to decline approximately 6 hours after dosing and returns to baseline by 16 to 24 hours after each dose.

In a clinical study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, the median peak serum calcium concentration measured 4 to 6 hours after dosing with FORTEO (teriparatide 20 mcg) was 2.42 mmol/L (9.68 mg/dL) at 12 months. The peak serum calcium remained below 2.76 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL) in >99% of women at each visit. Sustained hypercalcemia was not observed.

In this study, 11.1% of women treated with FORTEO had at least 1 serum calcium value above the upper limit of normal [2.64 mmol/L (10.6 mg/dL)] compared with 1.5% of women treated with placebo. The percentage of women treated with FORTEO whose serum calcium was above the upper limit of normal on consecutive 4- to 6–hour post–dose measurements was 3.0% compared with 0.2% of women treated with placebo. In these women, calcium supplements and/or FORTEO doses were reduced. The timing of these dose reductions was at the discretion of the investigator. FORTEO dose adjustments were made at varying intervals after the first observation of increased serum calcium (median 21 weeks). During these intervals, there was no evidence of progressive increases in serum calcium.

In a clinical study of men with either primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis, the effects on serum calcium were similar to those observed in postmenopausal women. The median peak serum calcium concentration measured 4 to 6 hours after dosing with FORTEO was 2.35 mmol/L (9.44 mg/dL) at 12 months. The peak serum calcium remained below 2.76 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL) in 98% of men at each visit. Sustained hypercalcemia was not observed.

In this study, 6.0% of men treated with FORTEO daily had at least 1 serum calcium value above the upper limit of normal [2.64 mmol/L (10.6 mg/dL)] compared with none of the men treated with placebo. The percentage of men treated with FORTEO whose serum calcium was above the upper limit of normal on consecutive measurements was 1.3% (2 men) compared with none of the men treated with placebo. Although calcium supplements and/or FORTEO doses could have been reduced in these men, only calcium supplementation was reduced (see PRECAUTIONS and ADVERSE EVENTS).

In a clinical study of women previously treated for 18 to 39 months with raloxifene (n=26) or alendronate (n=33), mean serum calcium >12 hours after FORTEO injection was increased by 0.09 to 0.14 mmol/L (0.36 to 0.56 mg/dL), after 1 to 6 months of FORTEO treatment compared with baseline. Of the women pretreated with raloxifene, 3 (11.5%) had a serum calcium >2.76 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL), and of those pretreated with alendronate, 3 (9.1%) had a serum calcium >2.76 mmol/L (11.0 mg/dL). The highest serum calcium reported was 3.12 mmol/L (12.5 mg/dL). None of the women had symptoms of hypercalcemia. There were no placebo controls in this study.

Urinary calcium excretion

In a clinical study of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who received 1000 mg of supplemental calcium and at least 400 IU of vitamin D, daily FORTEO increased urinary calcium excretion. The median urinary excretion of calcium was 4.8 mmol/day (190 mg/day) at 6 months and 4.2 mmol/day (170 mg/day) at 12 months. These levels were 0.76 mmol/day (30 mg/day) and 0.30 mmol/day (12 mg/day) higher, respectively, than in women treated with placebo. The incidence of hypercalciuria (>7.5 mmol Ca/day or 300 mg/day) was similar in the women treated with FORTEO or placebo.

In a clinical study of men with either primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis who received 1000 mg of supplemental calcium and at least 400 IU of vitamin D, daily FORTEO had inconsistent effects on urinary calcium excretion. The median urinary excretion of calcium was 5.6 mmol/day (220 mg/day) at 1 month and 5.3 mmol/day (210 mg/day) at 6 months. These levels were 0.50 mmol/day (20 mg/day) higher and 0.20 mmol/day (8.0 mg/day) lower, respectively, than in men treated with placebo. The incidence of hypercalciuria (>7.5 mmol Ca/day or 300 mg/day) was similar in the men treated with FORTEO or placebo.

Phosphorus and vitamin D

In single–dose studies, teriparatide produced transient phosphaturia and mild transient reductions in serum phosphorus concentration. However, hypophosphatemia (<0.74 mmol/L or 2.4 mg/dL) was not observed in clinical trials with FORTEO.

In clinical trials of daily FORTEO, the median serum concentration of 1,25–dihydroxyvitamin D was increased at 12 months by 19% in women and 14% in men, compared with baseline. In the placebo group, this concentration decreased by 2% in women and increased by 5% in men. The median serum 25–hydroxyvitamin D concentration at 12 months was decreased by 19% in women and 10% in men compared with baseline. In the placebo group, this concentration was unchanged in women and increased by 1% in men.

Effects on markers of bone turnover

Daily administration of FORTEO to men and postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in clinical studies stimulated bone formation, as shown by increases in the formation markers serum bone–specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) and procollagen I carboxy–terminal propeptide (PICP). Data on biochemical markers of bone turnover were available for the first 12 months of treatment. Peak concentrations of PICP at 1 month of treatment were approximately 41% above baseline, followed by a decline to near–baseline values by 12 months. BSAP concentrations increased by 1 month of treatment and continued to rise more slowly from 6 through 12 months. The maximum increases of BSAP were 45% above baseline in women and 23% in men. After discontinuation of therapy, BSAP concentrations returned toward baseline. The increases in formation markers were accompanied by secondary increases in the markers of bone resorption: urinary N-telopeptide (NTX) and urinary deoxypyridinoline (DPD), consistent with the physiological coupling of bone formation and resorption in skeletal remodeling. Changes in BSAP, NTX, and DPD were lower in men than in women, possibly because of lower systemic exposure to teriparatide in men.

CLINICAL STUDIES

Treatment of Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women

The safety and efficacy of once–daily FORTEO, median exposure of 19 months, were examined in a double–blind, placebo–controlled clinical study of 1637 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (FORTEO 20 mcg, n=541).

This multicenter study was performed in the US and 16 other countries. All women received 1000 mg of calcium per day and at least 400 IU of vitamin D per day. Baseline and endpoint spinal radiographs were evaluated using the semiquantitative scoring method of Genant et al [ J Bone Miner Res 1993;8(9):1137–48]. Ninety percent of the women in the study had 1 or more radiographically diagnosed vertebral fractures at baseline. The primary efficacy endpoint was the occurrence of new radiographically diagnosed vertebral fractures defined as changes in the height of previously undeformed vertebrae. Such fractures are not necessarily symptomatic.

Effect on fracture incidence

New vertebral fractures — FORTEO, when taken with calcium and vitamin D and compared with calcium and vitamin D alone, reduced the risk of 1 or more new vertebral fractures from 14.3% of women in the placebo group to 5.0% in the FORTEO group. This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001); the absolute reduction in risk was 9.3% and the relative reduction was 65%. FORTEO was effective in reducing the risk for vertebral fractures regardless of age, baseline rate of bone turnover, or baseline BMD.

Table 1. Effect of FORTEO on Risk of Vertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

Percent of Women with Fracture


FORTEO
(N=444)


Placebo
(N=448)


Absolute Risk
Reduction

(%, 95% CI)


Relative Risk
Reduction

(%, 95% CI)

   New fracture (≥1)

5.0 1

14.3

9.3 (5.5-13.1)

65 (45-78)

   1 fracture

3.8

9.4

   2 fractures

0.9

2.9

   ≥3 fractures

0.2

2.0

1 p≤0.001 compared with placebo.

New nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures — Table 2 shows the effect of FORTEO on the risk of nonvertebral fractures. FORTEO significantly reduced the risk of any nonvertebral fracture from 5.5% in the placebo group to 2.6% in the FORTEO group (p<0.05). The absolute reduction in risk was 2.9% and the relative reduction was 53%.

Table 2. Effects of FORTEO on Risk of New Nonvertebral Fractures in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis

FORTEO 1
N=541

Placebo
N=544

   Skeletal site

   Wrist

2 (0.4%)

7 (1.3%)

   Ribs

3 (0.6%)

5 (0.9%)

   Hip

1 (0.2%)

4 (0.7%)

   Ankle/Foot

1 (0.2%)

4 (0.7%)

   Humerus

2 (0.4%)

2 (0.4%)

   Pelvis

0

3 (0.6%)

   Other

6 (1.1%)

8 (1.5%)

    Total

14 (2.6%) 2

30 (5.5%)

1 Data shown as number (%) of women with fractures.
2 p<0.05 compared with placebo.

The cumulative percentage of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who sustained new nonvertebral fractures was lower in women treated with FORTEO than in women treated with placebo (see Figure 1).

Figure 1. Cumulative percentage of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis sustaining new nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures. <A class= 3 ">

Figure 1. Cumulative percentage of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis sustaining new nonvertebral osteoporotic fractures. 3

Effect on bone mineral density (BMD)

FORTEO increased lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Statistically significant increases were seen at 3 months and continued throughout the treatment period, as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2. Time course of change in lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with FORTEO vs placebo <A class= 4 (women with data available at all time points).">

Figure 2. Time course of change in lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with FORTEO vs placebo 4 (women with data available at all time points).

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were treated with FORTEO also had statistically significant increases in BMD at the femoral neck, total hip, and total body (see Table 3).

Table 3. Mean Percent Change in BMD from Baseline to Endpoint 1 in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis, Treated with FORTEO or Placebo

FORTEO
N=541

Placebo
N=544

   Lumbar spine BMD

9.7 2

1.1

   Femoral neck BMD

2.8 5

-0.7

   Total hip BMD

2.6

-1.0

   Trochanter BMD

3.5

-0.2

   Intertrochanter BMD

2.6

-1.3

   Ward’s triangle BMD

4.2

-0.8

   Total body BMD

0.6

-0.5

   Distal 1/3 radius BMD

-2.1

-1.3

   Ultradistal radius BMD

-0.1

-1.6

1 Intent-to-treat analysis, last observation carried forward.
2 p<0.001 compared with placebo.
3 This graph includes all fractures listed above in Table 2.
4 p<0.001 for FORTEO compared with placebo at each post-baseline time point
5 p<0.05 compared with placebo.

Figure 3 shows the cumulative distribution of the percentage change from baseline of lumbar spine BMD for the FORTEO and placebo groups. FORTEO treatment increased lumbar spine BMD from baseline in 96% of postmenopausal women treated (see Figure 3). Seventy–two percent of patients treated with FORTEO achieved at least a 5% increase in spine BMD, and 44% gained 10% or more.

Figure 3. Percent of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis attaining a lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline at least as great as the value on the x-axis (median duration of treatment 19 months).

Figure 3. Percent of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis attaining a lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline at least as great as the value on the x-axis (median duration of treatment 19 months).

Both treatment groups lost height during the trial. The mean decreases were 3.61 and 2.81 mm in the placebo and FORTEO groups, respectively.

Bone histology — The effects of teriparatide on bone histology were evaluated in iliac crest biopsies of 35 postmenopausal women treated for 12 to 24 months with calcium and vitamin D and teriparatide 20 or 40 mcg/day. Normal mineralization was observed with no evidence of cellular toxicity. The new bone formed with teriparatide was of normal quality (as evidenced by the absence of woven bone and marrow fibrosis).

Treatment to increase bone mass in men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis — The safety and efficacy of once–daily FORTEO, median exposure of 10 months, were examined in a double–blind, placebo–controlled clinical study of 437 men with either primary (idiopathic) or hypogonadal osteoporosis (FORTEO 20 mcg, n=151). This multicenter efficacy study was performed in the US and 10 other countries. All men received 1000 mg of calcium per day and at least 400 IU of vitamin D per day. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in lumbar spine BMD.

FORTEO increased lumbar spine BMD in men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis. Statistically significant increases were seen at 3 months and continued throughout the treatment period. FORTEO was effective in increasing lumbar spine BMD regardless of age, baseline rate of bone turnover, and baseline BMD. The effects of FORTEO at additional skeletal sites are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Mean Percent Change in BMD from Baseline to Endpoint 1 in Men with Primary or Hypogonadal Osteoporosis, Treated with FORTEO or Placebo for a Median of 10 Months

FORTEO
N=151

Placebo
N=147

   Lumbar spine BMD

5.9 2

0.5

   Femoral neck BMD

1.5 3

0.3

   Total hip BMD

1.2

0.5

   Trochanter BMD

1.3

1.1

   Intertrochanter BMD

1.2

0.6

   Ward’s triangle BMD

2.8

1.1

   Total body BMD

0.4

-0.4

   Distal 1/3 radius BMD

-0.5

-0.2

   Ultradistal radius BMD

-0.5

-0.3

1 Intent-to-treat analysis, last observation carried forward.
2 p<0.001 compared with placebo.
3 p<0.05 compared with placebo.

Figure 4 shows the cumulative distribution of the percentage change from baseline of lumbar spine BMD for the FORTEO and placebo groups. FORTEO treatment for a median of 10 months increased lumbar spine BMD from baseline in 94% of men treated. Fifty–three percent of patients treated with FORTEO achieved at least a 5% increase in spine BMD, and 14% gained 10% or more.

Figure 4. Percent of men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis attaining a lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline at least as great as the value on the x-axis (median duration of treatment 10 months).

Figure 4. Percent of men with primary or hypogonadal osteoporosis attaining a lumbar spine BMD percent change from baseline at least as great as the value on the x-axis (median duration of treatment 10 months).

-- advertisement -- The American Red Cross
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Site usage policy | Privacy policy

All Rights reserved - Copyright DrugLib.com, 2006-2012