WARNING
It is recommended that Fluorouracil Injection, USP be given only by or under the supervision of a qualified physician who is experienced in cancer chemotherapy and who is well versed in the use of potent antimetabolites. Because of the possibility of severe toxic reactions, it is recommended that patients be hospitalized at least during the initial course of therapy.
These instructions should be thoroughly reviewed before administration of Fluorouracil Injection, USP.
|
| |
FLUOROURACIL SUMMARY
Fluorouracil Injection, USP an antineoplastic antimetabolite, is a sterile, nonpyrogenic injectable solution for intravenous administration. Each 10 mL contains 500 mg fluorouracil; pH is adjusted to approximately 9.2 with sodium hydroxide.
Fluorouracil Injection, USP is effective in the palliative management of carcinoma of the colon, rectum, breast, stomach and pancreas.
|
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
Published Studies Related to Fluorouracil
Phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of recombinant human intestinal trefoil factor oral spray for prevention of oral mucositis in patients with colorectal cancer who are receiving fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. [2009.09.10] PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of recombinant human intestinal trefoil factor (rhITF) administered as topical oral spray for prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (OM)... CONCLUSION: rhITF oral spray formulation was safe and effective when used for the reduction of chemotherapy-associated OM in patients with colorectal cancer. Patients exhibited high compliance in dosing administration. Future clinical study is planned to develop this drug for use in OM management in patients with cancer.
Uracil-tegafur and tamoxifen vs cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil, and tamoxifen in post-operative adjuvant therapy for stage I, II, or IIIA lymph node-positive breast cancer: a comparative study. [2009.08.18] BACKGROUND: It has been reported that treatment with uracil-tegafur (UFT) has shown significantly better survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) than surgery alone. Therefore, we compared UFT with a combination therapy of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients who had undergone curative surgery for axillary lymph node-positive breast cancer... CONCLUSION: UFT administered in combination with TAM holds promise in the treatment of lymph node-positive early breast cancer. On stratified analysis, the recurrence rate in the UFT group was found to be better in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive patients. Tegafur-based treatment should be evaluated by a prospective randomised trial conducted in ER-positive patients.
Allopurinol mouth rinse for prophylaxis of fluorouracil-induced mucositis. [2009.07.29] Allopurinol mouth rinse for prophylaxis of fluorouracil-induced mucositisTo prepare and evaluate an allopurinol mouth rinse for prophylaxis of fluorouracil-induced mucositis, 33 patients with malignant disorders, who were going to receive 5-fluorouracil containing chemotherapy, were enrolled in a placebo-controlled double-blinded randomized clinical trial...
Randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil with node-positive breast cancer in Japan. [2009.07.03] BACKGROUND: To compare the cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) chemotherapy and the anthracycline-containing regimen cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the latter... CONCLUSION: Whereas CEF had a good trend compare with CMF, it could not be proven statistically significant. The principal cause of the failure seems to be insufficient power, that is, the dose intensity (EPI: 60 mg/m(2)) set 10 years ago, when the trial began, was low, and the number of trial subjects was small because of the background of the times, which made the accumulation of cases extremely difficult. However, the trial should be considered to be meaningful, as it was the first, formally conducted controlled trial on chemotherapy in Japan.
Improved overall survival with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as adjuvant treatment in stage II or III colon cancer in the MOSAIC trial. [2009.07.01] PURPOSE Three-year disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly improved in patients who had undergone resection with curative intent for stage II or III colon cancer who received bolus plus continuous-infusion fluorouracil plus leucovorin (LV5FU2) with the addition of oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4)... CONCLUSION Adding oxaliplatin to LV5FU2 significantly improved 5-year DFS and 6-year OS in the adjuvant treatment of stage II or III colon cancer and should be considered after surgery for patients with stage III disease.
Clinical Trials Related to Fluorouracil
Comparing Irinotecan and 5 FU/FA To 5-FU/FA After Resection Of Liver Metastases For Colorectal Cancer [Recruiting]
To see if Disease Free Survival (DFS) is improved when complete surgical resection of liver
metastases (R0) is followed by chemotherapy with CPT-11 and 5-FU/FA as FOLFIRI regimen,
compared to 5-FU/FA alone.
5FU vs 5FU With Viscoelastic Formulation for the Prevention of Scarring Post-Trabeculectomy [Not yet recruiting]
Trabeculectomy is the most effective method of lowering intraocular pressure in glaucoma
that is not well controlled with drop medication. The post-operative wound healing response
remains the major barrier in surgical success. Scar tissue formation results in occlusion of
the surgical drainage site created. As a consequence, the intraocular pressure rises once
again. The current use of anti-scarring agents such as 5 Fluorouracil (5FU), is a well
established method employed by ophthalmologists to clinically reduce the postoperative
scarring response. However, in patients with a high risk of bleb failure, repeated
subconjunctival injections of 5FU following bleb needling is often required resulting in
increased clinical load and patient inconvenience. A slow release formulation of 5FU would
be of benefit by releasing the 5FU into the subconjunctival space over an extended period
thereby providing a prolonged therapeutic effect. In addition, hyaluronic acid is known to
possess antifibrotic properties and from its gel-like physical state, would potentially act
as a physical tissue spacer that may further limit active subconjunctival scarring at the
site where it is injected. We hypothesise that injecting a mixture of 5FU with hyaluronic
acid would give better outcomes than injecting 5FU alone.
The aim of this study is to determine whether bleb needling with subconjunctival injection
of Viscoelastic/5FU formulation is an effective method for prolonged drug delivery in
preventing the post-operative scarring response. This will be a prospective case-controlled
study involving patients who have already undergone trabeculectomy and who require bleb
needling and subconjunctival 5FU injections.
Study of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil (Modified DCF) With Bevacizumab in Patients With Unresectable or Metastatic Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma [Recruiting]
This study is being done to find out what effects a drug named/called bevacizumab has on
patients and patients' tumors when given together with standard chemotherapy drugs. Making
new blood vessels seems to be important for many tumors to grow. Bevacizumab is a new type of
treatment for cancer that blocks the growth of new tumor blood vessels. In this study, the
researchers will combine bevacizumab with chemotherapy drugs that are standard for the
patient's disease and include cisplatin, docetaxel, fluorouracil, and leucovorin. The way the
original combination of cisplatin, docetaxel, and fluorouracil was given caused many side
effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, weakness, and a drop in the blood count of
infection fighting cells. For this study, the researchers have modified this combination to
give lower doses of the medicines more often, to reduce side effects from the chemotherapy.
Patients will receive bevacizumab with this modified combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and
fluorouracil. This study is called a phase II study. In this study, everyone will have
similar tumors and receive the same treatment.
Docetaxel, 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin in Adenocarcinoma of the Stomach or Gastroesophageal Junction Patients [Recruiting]
Phase I Objectives
Primary:
1. The primary objective of this study is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of
Docetaxel combined with 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin (D-FOX) in patients with untreated,
locally unresectable or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal
junction (GEJ).
Secondary:
1. To determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicity and reversibility of toxicity of
this combination.
Phase II Objectives
Primary:
1. To assess time to cancer progression to D-FOX treatment regimen.
Secondary:
1. To assess response rate to D-FOX treatment regimen.
2. To determine the qualitative and quantitative toxicity and reversibility of toxicity of
this combination treatment regimen.
3. Determine overall survival.
4. Perform an exploratory investigation into the effect of D-FOX on phenotypic
abnormalities in blood.
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Adjuvant Chemotherapy With 5-Fluorouracil and Oxaliplatin Versus 5-Fluorouracil Alone in Rectal Cancer [Recruiting]
Standard treatment for locally advanced cancer of the rectum is preoperative
chemoradiotherapy with 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) plus 4 cycles of postoperative chemotherapy
with 5-FU. According to our previous study (CAO/ARO/AIO-94, published in the New England
Journal of Medicine 2004; 351: 1731-40) this treatment results in only 6% of local failures,
yet, still 36% of all patients develop distant metastasis. Therefore, our new study
(CAO/ARO/AIO-04) incorporates new drugs, i. e. 5-FU + oxaliplatin, in an effort to improve
the control of distant metastases. It is our hypothesis that the rate of disease free
survival will improve by 5 to 8% after 3 years of follow-up.
|
|
|
|
Page last updated: 2009-10-20
|