Cervidil Related Published Studies
Well-designed clinical trials related to Cervidil (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
Factors predicting successful labor induction with dinoprostone and misoprostol vaginal inserts. [2009.08]
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. [2009.07]
Concurrent dinoprostone and oxytocin for labor induction in term premature rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial. [2009.05]
Misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert: a randomized controlled trial. [2008.10]
Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. [2008.09]
A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin. [2008]
Elective cervical ripening in women beyond the 290th day of pregnancy: a randomized trial comparing 2 dinoprostone preparations. [2007.10]
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. [2007.08]
Concurrent oxytocin with dinoprostone pessary versus dinoprostone pessary in labour induction of nulliparas with an unfavourable cervix: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. [2007.07]
Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. [2007.01.12]
A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy. [2006.10]
Comparison of two preparations of dinoprostone for pre-induction of labour in nulliparous women with very unfavourable cervical condition: a randomised clinical trial. [2005.04.01]
A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term. [2005.04]
Oral misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for induction of labor. [2005.03]
Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study. [2004.09.27]
A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress. [2004.07]
Randomized trial of intracervical versus posterior fornix dinoprostone for induction of labor. [2004.01]
A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction. [2004.01]
Six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. [2003.06]
Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. [2003.05]
Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction. [2003.04]
Comparative efficacy and cost of the prostaglandin analogs dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents. [2003.02]
Misoprostol and dinoprostone therapy for labor induction: a Doppler comparison of uterine and fetal hemodynamic effects. [2003.01.10]
Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. [2003.01]
Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening/labor induction. [2002.10]
Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial. [2002.02]
Randomized trial of concurrent oxytocin with a sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term. [2002.01]
Randomized study of vaginal misoprostol (PGE(1)) and dinoprostone gel (PGE(2)) for induction of labor at term. [2001.12]
Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone. [2001.12]
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of two different doses of misoprostol suppositories with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. [2001.06]
Misoprostol versus dinoprostone for cervical priming prior to induction of labour in term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial. [2001.05]
Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. [2001.01]
A randomized comparison of one single dose of vaginal 50 microg misoprostol with 3 mg dinoprostone in pre-induction cervical ripening. [2000.09]
[Induction of labor in patients with premature rupture of membranes in term pregnancy using dinoprostone vs oxytocin.An aleatory study] [1999.10]
Two dosing regimens for preinduction cervical priming with intravaginal dinoprostone pessary: a randomised clinical trial. [1999.09]
Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. [1999.08]
Membrane sweeping versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in the management of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks with an unfavorable cervix. [1999.03]
Effectiveness of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel (Prepidil), with immediate oxytocin, versus vaginal insert (Cervidil) for induction of labor. [1998.11]
A randomized trial comparing prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert (Cervidil) to vaginal gel for cervical ripening before induction of labor. [1998.07.01]
A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. [1997.09]
Prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening: a randomized comparison of Cervidil versus Prepidil. [1997.09]
Well-designed clinical trials possibly related to Cervidil (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
[Comparing two Prepidil gel regimens for cervical ripening before induction of labor at term: a randomized trial] [2009.06]
Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial. [2008.11]
Determining dose and endpoints of a controlled-release misoprostol vaginal insert for a phase III trial. [2008.09]
Is expensive always better? Comparison of two induction agents for term rupture of membranes. [2008.04]
A randomized comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) for labor induction. [2007.04]
Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study. [2007.01]
Effects of a single administration of prostaglandin F2alpha, or a combination of prostaglandin F2alpha and prostaglandin E2, or placebo on fertility variables in dairy cows 3-5 weeks post partum, a randomized, double-blind clinical trial. [2006.12.21]
Induction of labour at term with vaginal prostaglandins preparations: A randomised controlled trial of Prostin vs Propess. [2006.10]
Termination of second and early third trimester pregnancy: comparison of 3 methods. [2006.09]
Oral misoprostol for induction of labour at term: randomised controlled trial. [2006.03.04]
Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. [2006.03]
Randomized study on removable PGE2 vaginal insert versus PGE2 cervical gel for cervical priming and labor induction in low-Bishop-score pregnancy. [2006]
A randomized trial of prostaglandin E2 gel and extra-amniotic saline infusion with high dose oxytocin for cervical ripening. [2005.08]
A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term. [2005.05]
Prostaglandin E vaginal gel to treat dystocia in spontaneous labour: a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial. [2005.05]
Comparison of extraamniotic Foley catheter and intracervical prostaglandin E gel for preinduction cervical ripening. [2005.04]
Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score. [2005.02]
Comparison of prostaglandin E2 tablets or Foley catheter for labour induction in grand multiparas. [2004.07]
Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. [2004.07]
A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term. [2004.05]
Randomized trial between two active labor management protocols in the presence of an unfavorable cervix. [2004.01]
Second-trimester pregnancy termination: comparison of three different methods. [2003.07]
Trial of extra amniotic saline infusion with oxytocin versus prostaglandin E2 pessary for induction of labor. [2003.06]
Misoprostol for cervical ripening at and near term--a comparative study. [2003.05]
Induction of labour using low and high dose regimens of prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets. [2003.01]
A randomized controlled trial of outpatient versus inpatient labour induction with vaginal controlled-release prostaglandin-E2: effectiveness and satisfaction. [2003.01]
Intracervical misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 for labor induction. [2003.01]
Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary. [2002.11]
Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes. [2002.07]
Outpatient cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 and estradiol. [2002.02]
A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E2 for induction of labor. Insert vs. tablet. [2002.02]
Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial. [2001.09]
Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of misoprostol and prostaglandin E(2) in the preinduction and induction of labor. [2001.09]
A randomized prospective study of misoprostol and dinoproston for induction of labor. [2000.12]
Plasma prostaglandin E(2) metabolite levels during labor induction with a sustained-release prostaglandin E(2) vaginal insert. [2000.11]
Induction of labor by prostaglandin E(2) in relation to the Bishop score. [2000.10]
Randomized comparison of glyceryl trinitrate and prostaglandin E2 for cervical ripening at term. [2000.10]
Membrane sweeping in conjunction with labor induction. [2000.10]
Weekly administration of prostaglandin E2 gel compared with expectant management in women with previous cesareans. Prepidil Gel Study Group. [1999.08]
Vaginal misoprostol vs. concentrated oxytocin plus low-dose prostaglandin E2 for second trimester pregnancy termination. [1999.03]
Pre-eclampsia and induction of labor: a randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2 as an intracervical gel, with oxytocin immediately, or as a sustained-release vaginal insert. [1998.11]
A randomized comparison of vaginal prostaglandin E2 with oxytocin plus amniotomy for induction of labour in women with intermediately ripe cervices. [1998.10]
A randomized clinical trial of prostaglandin E2 intracervical gel and a slow release vaginal pessary for preinduction cervical ripening. [1998.08]
Other research related to Cervidil (Dinoprostone Vaginal)
Is there any relation between development of persistent non-reassuring fetal heart rate pattern and acutely increased uterine artery vascular flow resistance during dinoprostone use in prolonged pregnancies? [2009]
Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. [2008.11.26]
[Oral Misoprostol against Vaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction at Term: A Randomized Comparison.] [2008.10]
A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction. [2008.10]
Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2). [2008.10]
Comparison of Dinoprostone slow release pessary (Propess) with gel (Prostin) for induction of labour at term-a randomised trial. [2008.10]
Comparing two dinoprostone agents for cervical ripening and induction of labor: A randomized trial. [2008.06]
Dinoprostone vaginal slow-release system (Propess) compared to expectant management in the active treatment of premature rupture of the membranes at term: impact on maternal and fetal outcomes. [2008]
The influence of dinoprostone on uterine cervix ripening and the course of labor. [2007.08]
Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour. [2007.01]
Labor induction in preeclampsia: is misoprostol more effective than dinoprostone? [2007]
Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of the controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for cervical ripening/labor induction. [2003.04]
A randomized trial of vaginal prostaglandin E(2) gel and dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor at term. [1998.07.01]
Comparative cost analysis of prostaglandin analogues dinoprostone and misoprostol as labor preinduction agents. [1998.07.01]
Other possibly related research studies
A META-ANALYSIS OF CONTROLLED-RELEASE PROSTAGLANDIN FOR CERVICAL RIPENING AND LABOUR INDUCTION. [2000.09]
Inducing labor with a sustained-release PGE2 vaginal insert. Experience at a community hospital. [1998.05]
Prospective randomised controlled trial to compare safety and efficacy of intravaginal Misoprostol with intracervical Cerviprime for induction of labour with unfavourable cervix. [2008.04]
|
