AZASAN®, an immunosuppressive antimetabolite, is available in tablet form for oral administration.
AZASAN® is indicated as an adjunct for the prevention of rejection in renal homotransplantation. It is also indicated for the management of severe, active rheumatoid arthritis unresponsive to rest, aspirin, or other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, or to agents in the class of which gold is an example.
Renal Homotransplantation: AZASAN® is indicated as an adjunct for the prevention of rejection in renal homotransplantation. Experience with over 16,000 transplants shows a 5-year patient survival of 35% to 55%, but this is dependent on donor, match for HLA antigens, anti-donor and anti B-cell alloantigen antibody, and other variables. The effect of azathioprine on these variables has not been tested in controlled trials.
Rheumatoid Arthritis: AZASAN® is indicated only in adult patients meeting criteria for classic or definite rheumatoid arthritis as specified by the American Rheumatism Association. AZASAN® should be restricted to patients with severe, active and erosive disease not responsive to conventional management including rest, aspirin, or other nonsteroidal drugs or to agents in the class of which gold is an example. Rest, physiotherapy, and salicylates should be continued while AZASAN® is given, but it may be possible to reduce the dose of corticosteroids in patients on AZASAN®. The combined use of AZASAN® with gold, antimalarials, or penicillamine has not been studied for either added benefit or unexpected adverse effects. The use of AZASAN® with these agents cannot be recommended.
Published Studies Related to Azasan (Azathioprine)
Interferon, azathioprine and corticosteroids in multiple sclerosis: 6-year
follow-up of the ASA cohort. 
combined with low-dose azathioprine and prednisone in multiple sclerosis... CONCLUSION: The tested combined therapeutic regimen does not improve long-term
A randomized trial of methotrexate versus azathioprine for severe atopic eczema. [2011.08]
BACKGROUND: Patients with severe atopic eczema frequently require systemic treatment to control their disease. Methotrexate and azathioprine are proposed as off-label treatment options, but direct comparisons are lacking. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the efficacy and safety of methotrexate versus azathioprine in adults with severe atopic eczema... CONCLUSION: Both treatments achieved clinically relevant improvement and were safe in the short term. Methotrexate and azathioprine are appropriate options for the treatment of severe atopic eczema. Copyright (c) 2011 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of thiopurine methyltransferase genotyping prior to azathioprine treatment: the TARGET study. [2011.06]
AIM: To conduct a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial to assess whether thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping prior to azathioprine reduces adverse drug reactions (ADRs)... CONCLUSION: Our work supports the strong evidence that individuals with TPMT variant homozygosity are at high risk of severe neutropenia, whereas TPMT heterozygotes are not at increased risk of ADRs at standard doses of azathioprine.
Steroids and azathioprine in the treatment of IgA nephropathy. [2011.06]
AIM: IgA nephropathy (IgAN) is a very common glomerulonephritis among young adults, but the best therapeutic approach has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the effect of two different treatment regimes in IgAN, steroids alone or in combination with azathioprine... CONCLUSIONS: Both, steroid treatment alone and steroids in combination with azathioprine seem to be effective in reducing the severity of proteinuria and stabilizing renal function in IgAN. Patients who do not respond to steroids may have a better response with the combination of steroids and azathioprine.
Cyclosporine versus azathioprine therapy in high-risk idiopathic membranous nephropathy patients: A 3-year prospective study. [2011.03]
There is no consensus regarding the modality of therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN), especially for patients who did not react to treatment with cytotoxic drugs. This study followed prospectively for 3-year IMN patients who did not react to Ponticelli protocol comparing effects of 2-year course of cyclosporine (CsA) with azathioprine (Aza) treatment both with small doses of prednisolone...
Clinical Trials Related to Azasan (Azathioprine)
Azathioprine & Allopurinol in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients [Recruiting]
Azathioprine Versus Placebo in Pemphigus Vulgaris Treated With Prednisolone [Not yet recruiting]
Description: Pemphigus vulgaris is an autoimmune, chronic and recurrent blistering disease
with unknown etiology that affects mucosa and skin of patients with significant morbidity
The treatment back-bone is based on prednisolone administration. There are controversies on
the opportunity of adding immunosuppressive drugs. For some, they are just corticosteroid
sparing drugs. For others, they are disease modifying drugs.
The purpose of this trial is to compare efficacy and safety of azathioprine vs. placebo in
new cases of pemphigus vulgaris treated with prednisolone.
Myfortic Versus Azathioprine in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus [Recruiting]
This study is designed to explore the use of myfortic ® in patients with active lupus
erythematosus. Similar drugs in this class are increasingly used in organ transplantation
and in autoimmune diseases. With the established safety profile of myfortic ® in
allo-transplantation and the already existing data of mycophenolate mofetil in autoimmune
diseases, this study should help to demonstrate the beneficial effect of myfortic ® on lupus
activity. The aim of the study will be to show a decreased disease activity with myfortic ®
compared to standard maintenance therapy with azathioprine.
Study Comparing Two Tapering Strategies of Prednisone in Myasthenia Gravis [Recruiting]
Pathology - Generalized myasthenia gravis (MG) is cause of muscle weakness that can have a
significant impact on daily life activity but can also be, when respiratory or bulbar
muscles are involved, life-threatening.
Rationale - Additionally to thymectomy, which indication of is still debated in absence of
thymoma, the long-term treatment of generalized myasthenia gravis includes usually
prednisone and azathioprine. However, the most used scheme for prescribing and tapering
corticosteroid in MG resulted in a very important cumulative dose of prednisone. Indeed, at
twelve month, more than 50 percent of patients are still daily treated with at least 18 mg
of prednisone and the proportion of patients who are in remission and no longer taking
prednisone is very low (Palace and NEWSOM Davis, Neurology 1998). Prolonged corticosteroid
therapy is accompanied with various and major side effects, hypertension, osteoporosis,
weight gain, glaucoma. Therefore, tapering, eventually discontinuing, prednisone earlier is
a relevant therapeutic goal.
For this reason, the investigators will compare to the standard one, a strategy consisting
of a rapid decrease in corticosteroid.
Objective - To assess whether, in patients with generalized MG requiring a long-term
treatment with corticosteroids and azathioprine, that the strategy of rapid tapering allows
discontinuing more rapidly the prednisone for equivalent efficacy than the classical
Association Corticosteroid/Azathioprine in Microscopic Polyangiitis/ Polyarteritis NODOSA or Churg Strauss Syndrome [Recruiting]
To determine whether a combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine can achieve a higher
remission rate and a lower subsequent relapse rate in patients with newly-diagnosed
microscopic polyangiitis, polyarteritis NODOSA or Churg Strauss syndrome with no poor
prognosis factor (FFS=0), and without significantly increasing the rate of adverse events,
as compared to corticosteroids alone. The study hypothesis is a reduction of the absolute
risk of treatment failure or relapse within the first 24 months following initiation of
therapy of least 25%.
PATIENT REVIEWS / RATINGS / COMMENTS
Based on a total of 1 ratings/reviews, Azasan has an overall score of 9. The effectiveness score is 10 and the side effect score is 10. The scores are on ten point scale: 10 - best, 1 - worst.
Azasan review by 36 year old male patient
|Overall rating:|| || |
|Effectiveness:|| || Highly Effective|
|Side effects:|| || No Side Effects|
|Condition / reason:|| || ulcerative colitis|
|Dosage & duration:|| || 150 mg/d taken 1/d for the period of 10 yr|
|Other conditions:|| || none|
|Other drugs taken:|| || none|
|Benefits:|| || allowed maintained remission of ulcerative colitis for up to five years. did experience some flare ups, but they were short lived and the exception to years of complete remission|
|Side effects:|| || none|
|Comments:|| || treatment was prescribed as maintainance med for ulcerative colitis. allergies to common maintainance meds prevented use of any 5asa type meds.|
Page last updated: 2013-02-10