AMOXIL SUMMARY
Dual Therapy
Formulations of AMOXIL contain amoxicillin, a semisynthetic antibiotic, an analog of ampicillin, with a broad spectrum of bactericidal activity against many gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms.
AMOXIL is indicated in the treatment of infections due to susceptible (ONLY (beta)-lactamase-negative) strains of the designated microorganisms in the conditions listed below:
Infections of the ear, nose, and throat --due to
Streptococcus
spp. ((alpha)- and (beta)-hemolytic strains only), S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus
spp., or
H. influenzae.
Infections of the genitourinary tract --due to
E. coli, P. mirabilis, or
E. faecalis.
Infections of the skin and skin structure --due to
Streptococcus
spp. ((alpha)- and (beta)-hemolytic strains only), Staphylococcus
spp., or
E. coli.
Infections of the lower respiratory tract --due to
Streptococcus
spp. ((alpha)- and (beta)-hemolytic strains only), S. pneumoniae, Staphylococcus
spp., or
H. influenzae.
Gonorrhea, acute uncomplicated (ano-genital and urethral infections) --due to
N. gonorrhoeae
(males and females).
H. pylori
eradication to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence
Triple Therapy: AMOXIL/clarithromycin/lansoprazole
AMOXIL, in combination with clarithromycin plus lansoprazole as triple therapy, is indicated for the treatment of patients with
H. pylori
infection and duodenal ulcer disease (active or 1-year history of a duodenal ulcer) to eradicate
H. pylori. Eradication of
H. pylori
has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence. (See CLINICAL STUDIES and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
Dual Therapy: AMOXIL/lansoprazole
AMOXIL, in combination with lansoprazole delayed-release capsules as dual therapy, is indicated for the treatment of patients with
H. pylori
infection and duodenal ulcer disease (active or 1-year history of a duodenal ulcer) who are either allergic or intolerant to clarithromycin or in whom resistance to clarithromycin is known or suspected. (See the clarithromycin package insert, MICROBIOLOGY.) Eradication of
H. pylori
has been shown to reduce the risk of duodenal ulcer recurrence. (See CLINICAL STUDIES and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)
To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of AMOXIL and other antibacterial drugs, AMOXIL should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy. Indicated surgical procedures should be performed.
|
NEWS HIGHLIGHTS
Published Studies Related to Amoxil (Amoxicillin)
Randomized controlled trial comparing oral amoxicillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin with intravenous ceftriaxone and amikacin as outpatient therapy in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia. [2009.09] BACKGROUND: Outpatient oral therapy is infrequently used in pediatric low-risk febrile neutropenia (LRFN) as there is insufficient data regarding its equivalence as compared with parenteral therapy... CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient therapy is efficacious and safe in pediatric LRFN. There was no difference in outcome in oral versus IV outpatient therapy. Amoxycillin-clavulanate and ofloxacin may be the oral regimen of choice.
Reduced susceptibility to amoxicillin of oral streptococci following amoxicillin exposure. [2009.08] As antibiotic pressure often triggers bacterial resistance, the use of short-duration therapies is increasingly recommended. The objective of the present study was to evaluate both the clinical efficiency and the impact on oral streptococci of a 3 day versus a 7 day amoxicillin therapy for odontogenic infection requiring tooth extraction...
Efficacy of the standard quadruple therapy versus triple therapies containing proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin or amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and metronidazole for Helicobacter pylori eradication in children. [2009.08] CONCLUSION: Considering these data we suggest quadruple therapy as the first line of therapy for eradication of H. pylori infection in children in our geographic area (Iran).
Effectiveness of amoxicillin/clavulanate potassium in the treatment of acute bacterial sinusitis in children. [2009.07] OBJECTIVE: The role of antibiotic therapy in managing acute bacterial sinusitis (ABS) in children is controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of high-dose amoxicillin/potassium clavulanate in the treatment of children diagnosed with ABS... CONCLUSIONS: ABS is a common complication of viral upper respiratory infections. Amoxicillin/potassium clavulanate results in significantly more cures and fewer failures than placebo, according to parental report of time to resolution of clinical symptoms.
Intravenous amoxicillin-sulbactam against Escherichia coli: optimizing the dose, component ratio and infusion time using a human pharmacodynamic model. [2009.06] Amoxicillin-sulbactam (AMX-SUL) is an aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination currently available in 29 countries which may be a suitable option for treating intra-abdominal infections. the aim of this study was to identify the optimal dose and ratio between components of this formulation through an ex-vivo human pharmacodynamic model against Escherichia coli...
Clinical Trials Related to Amoxil (Amoxicillin)
Pediatric Taste Test Study of Cefdinir (Omnicef) Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications [Completed]
To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin
oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It was designed to determine if
Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
A Comparative, Single-Center, Pediatric Taste Test Study of Omnicef Versus Amoxicillin Antibiotic Suspension Medications [Completed]
To compare the taste and smell acceptability scores of cefdinir (Omnicef) versus amoxicillin
oral antibiotic suspension medications in pediatric subjects. It is designed to determine if
Omnicef or amoxicillin is preferred to the other with regard to taste or smell.
Efficacy of Single Versus Double Dose of Oral Amoxicillin for Non-Severe Pneumonia in Children [Completed]
The World Health Organization’s (WHO) standard case management strategy for reducing acute
respiratory infection (ARI) related mortality recommends oral cotrimoxazole and oral
amoxicillin as first line drugs for the treatment of pneumonia. In 1989, the Pakistan
Ministry of Health (MOH) adopted this strategy to control ARI mortality and recommended
cotrimoxazole for treatment of outpatients pneumonia due to lower costs. A number of studies
subsequently performed have shown significant in vivo and in vitro resistance of H.
influenzae and S. pneumoniae, the commonest bacteria causing childhood pneumonia, to
cotrimoxazole.
Although on a case by case basis for pneumonia, in vitro resistance does not correlate very
well with in vivo failures, nevertheless, clinical failure rate for pneumonia therapy has
increased in Pakistan over the years. One can hypothesize that if bacterial pneumonia is a
certain proportion of all pneumonia cases, the rise in clinical failures may be related to
increasing antimicrobial resistance. Therefore, it is probable that this rising clinical
failure rate could be a reflection of increasing resistance. There may be an increase in
antimicrobial resistance of S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae to amoxicillin over the period of
years and the rising treatment failure could be a reflection of the rising minimum inhibitory
concentrations (MIC’s) (> 2 mcg/ml for H. influenzae, 1993-94), thereby, resulting in this
increasing failure rate.
For the current study the researchers propose a multicentre, randomized, controlled double
blind trial in which standard versus double dose oral amoxicillin for three days for the
treatment of non-severe pneumonia in children less than five years of age will be compared.
Primary Objective:
To compare the proportion of children 2 – 59 months of age presenting with non-severe
pneumonia, who achieve clinical resolution on day 5 with standard (15 mg/kg/8hrly) versus
double dose (30 mg/kg/8hrly) of oral amoxicillin therapy given for 3 days.
Secondary Objective:
To follow the clinical course of non-severe pneumonia with the alternative criteria of
treatment failure (signs of deterioration i. e. lower chest indrawing and appearance of danger
signs) on or before day 3 and compare them with other children who have persistent fast
breathing (respiratory rate above the cut off for age) on day 3.
Hypothesis:
Therapy outcome with double dose of oral amoxicillin is not different than the standard dose
of amoxicillin, when used for three days for the treatment of non-severe pneumonia in 2–59
months old children.
Pharmacokinetic Profiles Of Amoxicillin 2000 mg And Clavulanate 125 mg In Adolescent Patients [Completed]
Clinical research study to test amoxicillin and clavulanate tablet formulation for use in
Acute Bacterial Sinusitis (ABS) in adolescent patients weighing at least 40 kilogram (kg) and
no more than 16 years old. ABS is an acute bacterial infection of the sinus. The purpose of
this study is to find out how children tolerate Augmentin XR and what happens to Augmentin
XR in the body after it has been swallowed by children.
Comparative Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Clarithromycin Extended-Release Tablets Versus Amoxicillin-Clavulanate for the Treatment of Acute Bacterial Sinusitis [Completed]
To compare the safety/tolerability and efficacy of a 14-day course of clarithromycin
extended-release tablets (2 x 500 mg QD) with that of a 14-day course of
amoxicillin-clavulanate tablets (875/125 mg BID) for the treatment of ambulatory subjects
with Acute Bacterial Sinusitis (ABS).
|
PATIENT REVIEWS / RATINGS / COMMENTSBased on a total of 12 ratings/reviews, Amoxil has an overall score of 7. The effectiveness score is 7.50 and the side effect score is 8. The scores are on ten point scale: 10 - best, 1 - worst. Below are selected reviews: the highest, the median and the lowest rated.
| | Amoxil review by care giver of 46 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Highly Effective |
| Side effects: | | No Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | strep throat |
| Dosage & duration: | | 500 mg 3 times/daily taken by mouth for the period of 10 days |
| Other conditions: | | fever |
| Other drugs taken: | | none | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | the drug worked usually by the second dose. My daughter was up and around and feeling better immediatley it seemed. It had no side effects that she ever had. She could either take it on a full tomach or empty one. |
| Side effects: | | There were no side effects that she ever had. |
| Comments: | | I woudl give her a pill 3 times daily. She would take it right before school, right afterschool and then right before bedtime. It was easy to swallow and didn't amke her tired or sleepy, so she was able to function at school. It seemed to work tight away usually within the first day of treatment. It was great!! |
|
| | Amoxil review by 19 year old male patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Highly Effective |
| Side effects: | | Severe Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | a boil |
| Dosage & duration: | | 500mg 1 tablet after 8 hours taken as prescribed for the period of 5 days |
| Other conditions: | | none other |
| Other drugs taken: | | later given an anti acid | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | the instructed me that by taking the antibiotic, it would surround the bacterias thus preventing further spread if the infections to other body parts.it really worked except that a nodule was left at the site of the boil. however, the drug gave me severe stomach aches due to gastritis before i went back to the physician to get some antiacids. |
| Side effects: | | anti acids |
| Comments: | | i was required to take drug for seven days. i only took it for 5 days and it still worked |
|
| | Amoxil review by 17 year old female patient | | | Rating |
| Overall rating: | |           |
| Effectiveness: | | Ineffective |
| Side effects: | | Severe Side Effects | | | Treatment Info |
| Condition / reason: | | Glandular Fever |
| Dosage & duration: | | 250mg taken 3 times daily for the period of 7 days |
| Other conditions: | | Swollen Glands, Mild Fever, Sore Throat, Headaches and Fatigue |
| Other drugs taken: | | Nurofen | | | Reported Results |
| Benefits: | | Very little affects were felt on my throat |
| Side effects: | | 9 days after first taking Amoxil, full body hives appeared. Never before been allergic to Amoxil, or anything else. Itching was severe and uncontrollable. |
| Comments: | | Was given the Amoxil without a blood test by not my usual doctor. After seeing my usual doctor he ordered a blood test, which found Glandular Fever was positive, and ordered me off the drugs. I had already, however taken the lot under the direction of first doctor. |
|
|
|
Page last updated: 2009-10-20
|