Spinal high-velocity low amplitude manipulation in acute nonspecific low back
pain: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial in comparison with diclofenac
and placebo.
Author(s): von Heymann WJ(1), Schloemer P, Timm J, Muehlbauer B.
Affiliation(s): Author information:
(1)Competence Center for Clinical Studies, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
vonheymann@aerzteseminar-mwe.de
Publication date & source: 2013, Spine (Phila Pa 1976). , 38(7):540-8
STUDY DESIGN: A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel trial
with 3 arms.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate in acute nonspecific low back pain (LBP) the
effectiveness of spinal high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation compared
with the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac and with placebo.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: LBP is an important economical factor in all
industrialized countries. Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of spinal
manipulation in comparison to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or placebo
regarding satisfaction and function of the patient, off-work time, and rescue
medication.
METHODS: A total of 101 patients with acute LBP (for <48 hr) were recruited from
5 outpatient practices, exclusion criteria were numerous and strict. The subjects
were randomized to 3 groups: (1) spinal manipulation and placebo-diclofenac; (2)
sham manipulation and diclofenac; (3) sham manipulation and placebo-diclofenac.
Outcomes registered by a second and blinded investigator included self-rated
physical disability, function (SF-12), off-work time, and rescue medication
between baseline and 12 weeks after randomization.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects received spinal manipulation, 38 diclofenac, and
25 no active treatment. The placebo group with a high number of dropouts for
unsustainable pain was closed praecox. Comparing the 2 active arms with the
placebo group the intervention groups were significantly superior to the control
group. Ninety subjects were analyzed in the collective intention to treat.
Comparing the 2 intervention groups, the manipulation group was significantly
better than the diclofenac group (Mann-Whitney test: P = 0.0134). No adverse
effects or harm was registered.
CONCLUSION: In a subgroup of patients with acute nonspecific LBP, spinal
manipulation was significantly better than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug
diclofenac and clinically superior to placebo.
|