Comparative efficacy and acceptability of mood stabilizer and second generation
antipsychotic monotherapy for acute mania--a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Author(s): Tarr GP, Glue P, Herbison P.
Affiliation(s): Departments of Psychological Medicine and Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin
School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Publication date & source: 2011, J Affect Disord. , 134(1-3):14-9
BACKGROUND: All treatment guidelines for acute mania recommend monotherapy with
either mood stabilizers (MS) or antipsychotics. The objective of this analysis
was to compare the efficacy and acceptability of both drug classes in an expanded
set of clinical trials in acute mania.
METHOD: Randomized double-blind trials comparing MS vs second generation
antipsychotics (SGA) in acute mania were identified in a systematic literature
search. Change in mania rating scale, responder rates and dropout rates were
compared by treatment assignment using Review Manager version 5.0.
RESULTS: Nine studies totaling 1631 patients that compared the MS lithium or
valproate against a number of SGAs, and which reported one or more analysis
endpoints were identified. Statistically significant advantages were noted in
favour of SGA over MS for standardized mean difference (SMD) for change in mania
scores (-0.22 [95% CI -0.33 to -0.11]; p < 0.0001), responder rate risk
difference (7% [95% CI 1% to 13%]; p = 0.02), and dropout risk difference (-5%
[95% CI -10% to -1%]; p = 0.02). This change in SMD for mania scores is
equivalent to a 2.5-3 point difference in Young Mania Rating Scale score. Similar
trends for SMD were noted when comparing subgroups of lithium and valproate
studies against SGAs.
LIMITATIONS: Over half the included studies included olanzapine, and the
applicability of these findings, especially to first generation antipsychotic
drugs, requires confirmation. This analysis could not assess the relative
efficacy of combined MS/SGA vs individual monotherapies.
CONCLUSION: In acute mania, monotherapy with SGAs demonstrates statistically
significant advantages over MS in terms of both efficacy and acceptability, and
may be preferable for initial choice of treatment.
|