Double-blind randomized trial of alteplase versus placebo in patients with chest pain at rest.

Author(s): Roberts MJ, McNeill AJ, Dalzell GW, Wilson CM, Webb SW, Khan MM, Patterson GC, Adgey AA

Affiliation(s): Regional Medical Cardiology Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast, N. Ireland.

Publication date & source: 1993-11, Eur Heart J., 14(11):1536-42.

Publication type: Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled Trial

Patients who have chest pain occurring at rest are at a significant risk of myocardial infarction and or sudden death. Most trials enter patients with anginal rest pain after an initial screening period. Thus, the clinical efficacy of early thrombolytic treatment for patients with rest pain remains unproven. Eighty patients with chest pain at rest and with ECG changes of ST depression of at least 1 mm in any ECG lead, were randomized to alteplase 100 mg infused over 3 h, or placebo. Concomitantly, all patients received intravenous heparin and 300 mg of aspirin daily (unless contra-indicated). Seventy-four patients had coronary angiography (the majority within 72 h of admission) of which 73 were assessable. The patency of the ischaemia-related vessel was not significantly greater in the alteplase treated group (81% vs 78%, P = 0.82). The culprit lesion morphology tended to be more concentric in the alteplase treated group (84% vs 56%, P = 0.06) although alteplase treatment was not associated with a significant reduction in the severity of the culprit lesion stenosis. Intra-coronary thrombi were detected in 7% of patients (3% placebo, 11% alteplase, P = 0.35). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction or the alteplase-treated group was 49 +/- 3% and for the placebo-treated patients 56 +/- 3% (P = 0.05). There was no difference in the total in-hospital cardiac event rate i.e. cardiac death, myocardial infarction and coronary revascularization between patients receiving alteplase (10%, 63%, and 38%) and those receiving placebo (8%, 65%, and 30%) respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)