Clevidipine for the treatment of severe hypertension in adults.
Author(s): Nguyen HM, Ma K, Pham DQ.
Affiliation(s): College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, Pomona, California
91766, USA.
Publication date & source: 2010, Clin Ther. , 32(1):11-23
BACKGROUND: Intravenous antihypertensive agents are used when immediate control
of blood pressure (BP) is required, including during the perioperative cardiac
surgery period. Controlling postoperative BP is challenging because of the need
to adequately reduce BP while maintaining appropriate end-organ perfusion.
Clevidipine is an intravenous, ultra-short-acting, third-generation
dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist with selectivity for arteriolar
vasodilatation. It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the
treatment of severe hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: This paper reviews the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic and
pharmacodynamic properties, tolerability, and clinical efficacy of clevidipine.
METHODS: To minimize selection bias, each author conducted an independent search
for English-language publications indexed on MEDLINE and International
Pharmaceutical Abstracts through January 2010 using the term clevidipine. All
identified prospective, randomized and nonrandomized Phase III trials were
included in the review.
RESULTS: Seven Phase III trials were identified in which clevidipine was compared
with baseline, placebo, or other intravenous antihypertensive agents in the
settings of severe hypertension (1 study), preoperative cardiac surgery (1),
perioperative cardiac surgery (1), and postoperative cardiac surgery (4). In a
multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy
of clevidipine in treating preoperative hypertension, the mean reduction from
baseline in mean arterial pressure was 31.2% with clevidipine and 11.2% with
placebo (P < 0.001). In a randomized, open-label, prospective study involving
separate comparisons of clevidipine with nitroglycerin, sodium nitroprusside, and
nicardipine, the median total AUC for digression in systolic BP from the
predetermined target range differed significantly between clevidipine and
nitroglycerin (4.14 vs 8.87 mm Hg . min/h; respectively, P < 0.001) and between
clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (4.37 vs 10.5 mm Hg . min/h; P = 0.003), but
not between clevidipine and nicardipine (1.76 and 1.69 mm Hg . min/h). Another
study found no significant difference in efficacy in controlling BP during the
3-hour study period between clevidipine and sodium nitroprusside (AUC for mean
[SD] arterial pressure, 106 [25] and 101 [28] mm Hg . min/h, respectively).
Adverse events in these studies included atrial fibrillation (13.0%-36.1%
clevidipine vs 12.0% placebo), nausea (5.0%-21.0% vs 12.0%, respectively), fever
(19.0% vs 13.7%), insomnia (12.0% vs 6.1%), and acute renal failure (9.0% vs
2.0%). In the studies reviewed, only 1 case of chest discomfort in the setting of
severe hypertension was considered a serious adverse event related to clevidipine
therapy.
CONCLUSION: In the Phase III trials reviewed, clevidipine was effective in
controlling BP in the settings of perioperative cardiac surgery and severe
hypertension and was associated with minimal adverse effects.
|