Cumulative dose-response study of non-CFC propellant HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate metered-dose inhaler in patients with asthma.

Author(s): Kleerup EC, Tashkin DP, Cline AC, Ekholm BP

Affiliation(s): Department of Medicine, University of California School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.

Publication date & source: 1996-03, Chest., 109(3):702-7.

Publication type: Clinical Trial; Randomized Controlled Trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study compares the safety and efficacy of HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate (Airomir in the 3M CFC-free system [3M Pharmaceuticals]) and CFC 11/12 salbutamol (Ventolin [Allen & Hanburys]) in a cumulative dose-response (1, 1, 2, 4, 8 inhalations at 30-min intervals) study in asthmatic patients. DESIGN: Randomized, single-blind, two-period cross-over study. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four stable mild to moderate asthmatics. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: At all cumulative inhalations, the changes in FEV1 (absolute, percent, and percent predicted) and FVC were equivalent. There was also no significant difference in heart rate, serum potassium level, BP, 12-lead ECG, Holter monitor recordings, or adverse events. Both HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate and CFC 11/12 salbutamol displayed a significant dose-response for FEV1, FEF25-75%, FVC, serum potassium, heart rate, and systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate and CFC 11/12 salbutamol produced clinically and statistically similar airway responses and side effects. These results indicate that HFA 134a salbutamol sulfate would be a safe and effective substitute for CFC 11/12 salbutamol.