Escitalopram treatment for depressive disorder following acute coronary syndrome:
a 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Author(s): Kim JM(1), Bae KY, Stewart R, Jung BO, Kang HJ, Kim SW, Shin IS, Hong YJ, Kim JH,
Shin HY, Kang G, Ahn Y, Kim JK, Jeong MH, Yoon JS.
Affiliation(s): Author information:
(1)Departments of Psychiatry, Cardiology, Biomedical Science, and Pharmacology,
Chonnam National University Medical School.
Publication date & source: 2015, J Clin Psychiatry. , 76(1):62-8
OBJECTIVE: Depression is common after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and has
adverse effects on prognosis. There are few evidence-based interventions for
treating depression in ACS. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of
escitalopram in treating depressive disorders identified 2-14 weeks after a
confirmed ACS episode.
METHOD: A total of 217 patients with DSM-IV depressive disorders (121 major and
96 minor) and ACS were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram in flexible
doses of 5-20 mg/d (n = 108) or placebo (n = 109) for 24 weeks. The study was
conducted from 2007 to 2013. The primary outcome measure was the Hamilton
Depression Rating Scale (HDRS). Secondary outcome measures included the
Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory
(BDI), Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S), Social and
Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), and World Health Organization
Disability Assessment Schedule-12. Cardiovascular safety outcomes included
echocardiography, electrocardiography, laboratory test, body weight, and blood
pressure results.
RESULTS: Escitalopram was superior to placebo in reducing HDRS scores (mean
difference = 2.3, P = .016, effect size = 0.38). Escitalopram was also superior
to placebo in decreasing depressive symptoms evaluated by the MADRS, BDI, and
CGI-S and in improving SOFAS functioning level. Escitalopram was not associated
with any harmful changes in cardiovascular safety measures. Dizziness was
significantly more frequently reported in the escitalopram group (P = .018), but
there were no significant differences in any other adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that escitalopram has clinically meaningful
antidepressant effects with no evidence of reduced cardiovascular safety in
depressive disorder following ACS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00419471.
|